Ultrasound vessel sizing before cannulation: a measurement-first approach for anesthesiologists.

IF 4.1
Luis Alberto Rodriguez Linares, Sarah Cerillo Lopes
{"title":"Ultrasound vessel sizing before cannulation: a measurement-first approach for anesthesiologists.","authors":"Luis Alberto Rodriguez Linares, Sarah Cerillo Lopes","doi":"10.1186/s44158-026-00399-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The catheter gauge and length are often chosen based on visual estimation. Ultrasound allows for the direct measurement of vessel diameter and depth, which may reduce failed attempts, particularly in patients with difficult access and pediatric patients. This narrative review evaluated trials, meta-analyses, and guidelines on ultrasound-guided vascular access in adults and children to derive practical sizing rules for venous and arterial cannulation in anesthesiology. Key recommendations include targeting a catheter-to-vein ratio (CVR) ≤ 0.45 for peripheral IVs and using long catheters for deeper veins (≥ 8-10 mm); limiting catheter size to ≤ 1/3 of the vessel's luminal area (outer diameter/inner diameter ratio ≤ 0.577) for arterial lines to prevent spasm. A pediatric reference table links typical radial artery diameters to appropriate 22-24G catheter choices. Selecting central venous catheters that occupy approximately ≤ 33% of the vein's diameter may be a reasonable strategy to minimize complications. Evidence from clinical trials supports US-guided peripheral IV and radial artery cannulation over landmark-based techniques. We propose a five-step workflow (scan, measure, select gauge/length, US-guided cannulation, and confirmation) to implement this measurement-first approach. In conclusion, an ultrasound measurement-first strategy aligns catheter selection with vessel dimensions, improving first-pass success and reducing complications in both adult and pediatric practices. The proposed sizing tables and algorithm are intended to serve as practical decision-support tools for bedside applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13366828/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-026-00399-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The catheter gauge and length are often chosen based on visual estimation. Ultrasound allows for the direct measurement of vessel diameter and depth, which may reduce failed attempts, particularly in patients with difficult access and pediatric patients. This narrative review evaluated trials, meta-analyses, and guidelines on ultrasound-guided vascular access in adults and children to derive practical sizing rules for venous and arterial cannulation in anesthesiology. Key recommendations include targeting a catheter-to-vein ratio (CVR) ≤ 0.45 for peripheral IVs and using long catheters for deeper veins (≥ 8-10 mm); limiting catheter size to ≤ 1/3 of the vessel's luminal area (outer diameter/inner diameter ratio ≤ 0.577) for arterial lines to prevent spasm. A pediatric reference table links typical radial artery diameters to appropriate 22-24G catheter choices. Selecting central venous catheters that occupy approximately ≤ 33% of the vein's diameter may be a reasonable strategy to minimize complications. Evidence from clinical trials supports US-guided peripheral IV and radial artery cannulation over landmark-based techniques. We propose a five-step workflow (scan, measure, select gauge/length, US-guided cannulation, and confirmation) to implement this measurement-first approach. In conclusion, an ultrasound measurement-first strategy aligns catheter selection with vessel dimensions, improving first-pass success and reducing complications in both adult and pediatric practices. The proposed sizing tables and algorithm are intended to serve as practical decision-support tools for bedside applications.

插管前超声血管大小:麻醉医师测量第一的方法。
导尿管的直径和长度通常是根据目测来选择的。超声允许直接测量血管直径和深度,这可以减少失败的尝试,特别是在难以进入的患者和儿科患者中。本文综述了超声引导成人和儿童血管通路的试验、荟萃分析和指南,以得出麻醉学中静脉和动脉插管的实用尺寸规则。主要建议包括:外周静脉的管静脉比(CVR)≤0.45,深部静脉(≥8-10 mm)使用长导管;将导管尺寸限制在血管管腔面积的1/3以内(外径/内径比≤0.577),以防止动脉线痉挛。儿科参考表将典型桡动脉直径与适当的22-24G导管选择联系起来。选择约占静脉直径≤33%的中心静脉导管可能是减少并发症的合理策略。来自临床试验的证据支持us引导的外周静脉和桡动脉插管优于基于地标的技术。我们提出了一个五步工作流程(扫描,测量,选择量规/长度,美国引导插管和确认)来实现这种测量优先的方法。总之,超声测量优先策略使导管选择与血管尺寸一致,提高了首次通过的成功率,减少了成人和儿童手术的并发症。提出的尺寸表和算法旨在作为床边应用的实际决策支持工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书