Famke S Cosijn, Jordi W J van Unnik, Lieza G Exalto, Larah N de Groot, Daphne N Weemering, Rene C van Rijssen, Roel G Vink, Leonard H van den Berg, Ruben P A van Eijk
{"title":"Clinical drug development in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: industry-reported challenges and opportunities.","authors":"Famke S Cosijn, Jordi W J van Unnik, Lieza G Exalto, Larah N de Groot, Daphne N Weemering, Rene C van Rijssen, Roel G Vink, Leonard H van den Berg, Ruben P A van Eijk","doi":"10.1080/21678421.2026.2671167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The pharmaceutical industry plays a pivotal role in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) drug development, yet the challenges and priorities remain largely unexplored. This study aims to identify industry-perceived opportunities for ALS and examine industry perspectives on trial design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey study was conducted among pharmaceutical companies involved in ALS drug development. The survey was based on literature review and interviews with industry experts. Final survey topics included scientific and operational challenges as well as preferred design settings for phase 2 and 3 clinical trials. Respondents were asked to rank trial-related topics using Likert scales.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 53 industry professionals responded, representing 42 international companies. Respondents identified three major scientific challenges: heterogeneity in disease progression, lack of reliable biomarkers, and insensitive efficacy measures. Insufficient funding, high dropout rates, and staffing shortages emerged as main operational barriers. For phase 2 trials, neurofilament light chain was most often prioritized as primary outcome, whereas the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised was prioritized for phase 3, although priority rankings varied considerably among respondents. Expected median sample sizes were 100 patients (range 20-300) for phase 2 and 300 patients (range 60-800) for phase 3. Overall, 58% of the respondents indicated that standardizing aspects of trial design could enhance trial quality and success rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides an overview of the industry-perceived challenges, exposing strategic knowledge gaps related to disease and clinical heterogeneity. Standardization of key trial design elements may help mitigate these challenges and better align ALS drug development efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":72184,"journal":{"name":"Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21678421.2026.2671167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The pharmaceutical industry plays a pivotal role in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) drug development, yet the challenges and priorities remain largely unexplored. This study aims to identify industry-perceived opportunities for ALS and examine industry perspectives on trial design.
Methods: A survey study was conducted among pharmaceutical companies involved in ALS drug development. The survey was based on literature review and interviews with industry experts. Final survey topics included scientific and operational challenges as well as preferred design settings for phase 2 and 3 clinical trials. Respondents were asked to rank trial-related topics using Likert scales.
Results: In total, 53 industry professionals responded, representing 42 international companies. Respondents identified three major scientific challenges: heterogeneity in disease progression, lack of reliable biomarkers, and insensitive efficacy measures. Insufficient funding, high dropout rates, and staffing shortages emerged as main operational barriers. For phase 2 trials, neurofilament light chain was most often prioritized as primary outcome, whereas the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised was prioritized for phase 3, although priority rankings varied considerably among respondents. Expected median sample sizes were 100 patients (range 20-300) for phase 2 and 300 patients (range 60-800) for phase 3. Overall, 58% of the respondents indicated that standardizing aspects of trial design could enhance trial quality and success rates.
Conclusions: This study provides an overview of the industry-perceived challenges, exposing strategic knowledge gaps related to disease and clinical heterogeneity. Standardization of key trial design elements may help mitigate these challenges and better align ALS drug development efforts.