Clinical drug development in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: industry-reported challenges and opportunities.

IF 2.8
Famke S Cosijn, Jordi W J van Unnik, Lieza G Exalto, Larah N de Groot, Daphne N Weemering, Rene C van Rijssen, Roel G Vink, Leonard H van den Berg, Ruben P A van Eijk
{"title":"Clinical drug development in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: industry-reported challenges and opportunities.","authors":"Famke S Cosijn, Jordi W J van Unnik, Lieza G Exalto, Larah N de Groot, Daphne N Weemering, Rene C van Rijssen, Roel G Vink, Leonard H van den Berg, Ruben P A van Eijk","doi":"10.1080/21678421.2026.2671167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The pharmaceutical industry plays a pivotal role in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) drug development, yet the challenges and priorities remain largely unexplored. This study aims to identify industry-perceived opportunities for ALS and examine industry perspectives on trial design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey study was conducted among pharmaceutical companies involved in ALS drug development. The survey was based on literature review and interviews with industry experts. Final survey topics included scientific and operational challenges as well as preferred design settings for phase 2 and 3 clinical trials. Respondents were asked to rank trial-related topics using Likert scales.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 53 industry professionals responded, representing 42 international companies. Respondents identified three major scientific challenges: heterogeneity in disease progression, lack of reliable biomarkers, and insensitive efficacy measures. Insufficient funding, high dropout rates, and staffing shortages emerged as main operational barriers. For phase 2 trials, neurofilament light chain was most often prioritized as primary outcome, whereas the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised was prioritized for phase 3, although priority rankings varied considerably among respondents. Expected median sample sizes were 100 patients (range 20-300) for phase 2 and 300 patients (range 60-800) for phase 3. Overall, 58% of the respondents indicated that standardizing aspects of trial design could enhance trial quality and success rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides an overview of the industry-perceived challenges, exposing strategic knowledge gaps related to disease and clinical heterogeneity. Standardization of key trial design elements may help mitigate these challenges and better align ALS drug development efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":72184,"journal":{"name":"Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21678421.2026.2671167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The pharmaceutical industry plays a pivotal role in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) drug development, yet the challenges and priorities remain largely unexplored. This study aims to identify industry-perceived opportunities for ALS and examine industry perspectives on trial design.

Methods: A survey study was conducted among pharmaceutical companies involved in ALS drug development. The survey was based on literature review and interviews with industry experts. Final survey topics included scientific and operational challenges as well as preferred design settings for phase 2 and 3 clinical trials. Respondents were asked to rank trial-related topics using Likert scales.

Results: In total, 53 industry professionals responded, representing 42 international companies. Respondents identified three major scientific challenges: heterogeneity in disease progression, lack of reliable biomarkers, and insensitive efficacy measures. Insufficient funding, high dropout rates, and staffing shortages emerged as main operational barriers. For phase 2 trials, neurofilament light chain was most often prioritized as primary outcome, whereas the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised was prioritized for phase 3, although priority rankings varied considerably among respondents. Expected median sample sizes were 100 patients (range 20-300) for phase 2 and 300 patients (range 60-800) for phase 3. Overall, 58% of the respondents indicated that standardizing aspects of trial design could enhance trial quality and success rates.

Conclusions: This study provides an overview of the industry-perceived challenges, exposing strategic knowledge gaps related to disease and clinical heterogeneity. Standardization of key trial design elements may help mitigate these challenges and better align ALS drug development efforts.

肌萎缩性侧索硬化症的临床药物开发:行业报告的挑战和机遇。
目的:制药行业在肌萎缩性侧索硬化症(ALS)药物开发中发挥着关键作用,但挑战和优先事项在很大程度上仍未被探索。本研究旨在找出业界对渐冻症的认知机会,并检视业界对试验设计的看法。方法:对参与ALS药物开发的制药公司进行调查研究。这项调查是基于文献综述和对行业专家的采访。最后的调查主题包括科学和操作方面的挑战,以及2期和3期临床试验的首选设计设置。受访者被要求使用李克特量表对试验相关主题进行排名。结果:共有53位行业专业人士回应,代表42家国际公司。受访者确定了三个主要的科学挑战:疾病进展的异质性,缺乏可靠的生物标志物,以及不敏感的疗效测量。资金不足、辍学率高和人员短缺成为主要的业务障碍。对于2期试验,神经丝轻链通常被优先考虑为主要结果,而ALS功能评定量表-修订版被优先考虑为3期试验,尽管在应答者之间的优先级排名差异很大。预期中位样本量2期为100例(范围20-300),3期为300例(范围60-800)。总体而言,58%的受访者表示,标准化试验设计方面可以提高试验质量和成功率。结论:本研究概述了行业感知的挑战,揭示了与疾病和临床异质性相关的战略知识差距。关键试验设计要素的标准化可能有助于缓解这些挑战,并更好地协调ALS药物开发工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书