Intestinal ultrasound to detect postoperative recurrence in patients with Crohn's disease: an international, multidisciplinary, RAND/UCLA appropriateness method study.

IF 39.1 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-20 DOI:10.1016/S2468-1253(26)00082-8
Christopher Ma, Siwar Albashir, Mariangela Allocca, Anthony de Buck van Overstraeten, Paulo G Kotze, Cathy Lu, Christian Maaser, Giovanni Maconi, Remo Panaccione, Miguel Regueiro, Jordi Rimola, Antonino Spinelli, Stuart A Taylor, Rune Wilkens, Willem Bemelman, Noa Krugliak Cleveland, Krisztina B Gecse, Susan Archer, Soushyant Kiarasi, Linda J Cornfield, Kerri L Novak
{"title":"Intestinal ultrasound to detect postoperative recurrence in patients with Crohn's disease: an international, multidisciplinary, RAND/UCLA appropriateness method study.","authors":"Christopher Ma, Siwar Albashir, Mariangela Allocca, Anthony de Buck van Overstraeten, Paulo G Kotze, Cathy Lu, Christian Maaser, Giovanni Maconi, Remo Panaccione, Miguel Regueiro, Jordi Rimola, Antonino Spinelli, Stuart A Taylor, Rune Wilkens, Willem Bemelman, Noa Krugliak Cleveland, Krisztina B Gecse, Susan Archer, Soushyant Kiarasi, Linda J Cornfield, Kerri L Novak","doi":"10.1016/S2468-1253(26)00082-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intestinal ultrasound is a non-invasive method increasingly used to diagnose and monitor disease activity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease; however, there is no consensus on the appropriate implementation of intestinal ultrasound to assess postoperative recurrence in Crohn's disease. We aimed to develop expert-based recommendations for standardising intestinal ultrasound use for the detection and evaluation of postoperative Crohn's disease recurrence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An international, multidisciplinary, modified RAND/University of California Los Angeles appropriateness method was used. Based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature, expert opinion, and panellist feedback, a list of statements related to the use of intestinal ultrasound in this setting was generated. Panellists with expertise in Crohn's disease intestinal ultrasound, surgery, postoperative management, clinical trials, and outcome measures were invited. Panellists rated the appropriateness of each statement on a 9-point Likert scale in two rounds of voting, with statements classified as appropriate, inappropriate, or uncertain based on median panel rating and the presence of disagreement, then met in person to discuss the results and vote on the appropriate and inappropriate statements in a final round of ratification voting. Statements ratified by 75% or more of the panellists were incorporated into the final recommendations.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The first online survey was open to the panellists from June 21, 2024, to Aug 6, 2024, and the second survey round was available between Nov 1 and Nov 25, 2024. The in-person ratification meeting was held on Feb 21, 2025. The panel comprised 16 experts (12 [75%] men and four [25%] women) from nine countries (Brazil, Canada, Denmark, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, the UK, and the USA) with specialties in gastroenterology (n=10), colorectal surgery (n=4), and radiology (n=2). The overall response rate was 100% (all 16 panellists) for the first round of voting and 94% (15 of 16) for the second round of voting, with 12 (75%) of 16 panellists participating in ratification voting. The first survey contained 116 statements, with 88 (76%) rated as appropriate, two (2%) as inappropriate, and 26 (22%) as uncertain. Of the 122 statements in the second survey, 97 (80%) were rated appropriate, two (2%) were inappropriate, and 23 (19%) were uncertain. 79 statements were voted on during the ratification meeting and 67 (85%) were ratified. Recommended anatomical components for sonographic evaluation were the colonic segment immediately distal to the anastomosis, the neoterminal ileum, neoterminal ileal inlet, colonic and ileal blind side of the anastomosis, sonographically visible colonic segments, and the surrounding mesentery. Recommended parameters for assessment were bowel wall thickness, bowel wall stratification, bowel wall vascularity; mesenteric inflammatory fat and lymphadenopathy; luminal narrowing; and the presence of complications (abscess, inflammatory mass, fistula or sinus tract, stricture and stricture length, and prestenotic dilation). Intestinal ultrasound findings in the neoterminal ileum and the inlet of the neoterminal ileum were considered most likely to reflect clinically meaningful disease activity. Waiting at least 4 weeks after surgery to perform intestinal ultrasound was recommended to avoid confounding the interpretation of sonographic findings with immediate postoperative complications or changes associated with surgical healing. The first assessment is recommended to be performed 3-12 months after surgery.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>These multidisciplinary recommendations aim to standardise the application of intestinal ultrasound for assessing postoperative recurrence of Crohn's disease after surgical bowel ileocolic resection. Future development of a reliable, validated index for Crohn's disease postoperative recurrence is an important next step.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":56028,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"602-615"},"PeriodicalIF":39.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(26)00082-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intestinal ultrasound is a non-invasive method increasingly used to diagnose and monitor disease activity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease; however, there is no consensus on the appropriate implementation of intestinal ultrasound to assess postoperative recurrence in Crohn's disease. We aimed to develop expert-based recommendations for standardising intestinal ultrasound use for the detection and evaluation of postoperative Crohn's disease recurrence.

Methods: An international, multidisciplinary, modified RAND/University of California Los Angeles appropriateness method was used. Based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature, expert opinion, and panellist feedback, a list of statements related to the use of intestinal ultrasound in this setting was generated. Panellists with expertise in Crohn's disease intestinal ultrasound, surgery, postoperative management, clinical trials, and outcome measures were invited. Panellists rated the appropriateness of each statement on a 9-point Likert scale in two rounds of voting, with statements classified as appropriate, inappropriate, or uncertain based on median panel rating and the presence of disagreement, then met in person to discuss the results and vote on the appropriate and inappropriate statements in a final round of ratification voting. Statements ratified by 75% or more of the panellists were incorporated into the final recommendations.

Findings: The first online survey was open to the panellists from June 21, 2024, to Aug 6, 2024, and the second survey round was available between Nov 1 and Nov 25, 2024. The in-person ratification meeting was held on Feb 21, 2025. The panel comprised 16 experts (12 [75%] men and four [25%] women) from nine countries (Brazil, Canada, Denmark, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, the UK, and the USA) with specialties in gastroenterology (n=10), colorectal surgery (n=4), and radiology (n=2). The overall response rate was 100% (all 16 panellists) for the first round of voting and 94% (15 of 16) for the second round of voting, with 12 (75%) of 16 panellists participating in ratification voting. The first survey contained 116 statements, with 88 (76%) rated as appropriate, two (2%) as inappropriate, and 26 (22%) as uncertain. Of the 122 statements in the second survey, 97 (80%) were rated appropriate, two (2%) were inappropriate, and 23 (19%) were uncertain. 79 statements were voted on during the ratification meeting and 67 (85%) were ratified. Recommended anatomical components for sonographic evaluation were the colonic segment immediately distal to the anastomosis, the neoterminal ileum, neoterminal ileal inlet, colonic and ileal blind side of the anastomosis, sonographically visible colonic segments, and the surrounding mesentery. Recommended parameters for assessment were bowel wall thickness, bowel wall stratification, bowel wall vascularity; mesenteric inflammatory fat and lymphadenopathy; luminal narrowing; and the presence of complications (abscess, inflammatory mass, fistula or sinus tract, stricture and stricture length, and prestenotic dilation). Intestinal ultrasound findings in the neoterminal ileum and the inlet of the neoterminal ileum were considered most likely to reflect clinically meaningful disease activity. Waiting at least 4 weeks after surgery to perform intestinal ultrasound was recommended to avoid confounding the interpretation of sonographic findings with immediate postoperative complications or changes associated with surgical healing. The first assessment is recommended to be performed 3-12 months after surgery.

Interpretation: These multidisciplinary recommendations aim to standardise the application of intestinal ultrasound for assessing postoperative recurrence of Crohn's disease after surgical bowel ileocolic resection. Future development of a reliable, validated index for Crohn's disease postoperative recurrence is an important next step.

Funding: Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine.

肠超声检测克罗恩病患者术后复发:一项国际、多学科、兰德/加州大学洛杉矶分校适宜性方法研究
背景:肠道超声是一种非侵入性方法,越来越多地用于诊断和监测炎症性肠病患者的疾病活动;然而,肠超声评估克罗恩病术后复发的合适方法尚无共识。我们的目的是制定基于专家的建议,以标准化肠超声用于克罗恩病术后复发的检测和评估。方法:采用国际、多学科、改良的兰德/加州大学洛杉矶分校适宜性方法。基于对文献、专家意见和小组成员反馈的系统回顾和荟萃分析,生成了一份关于在这种情况下使用肠道超声的声明清单。邀请了在克罗恩病肠道超声、手术、术后管理、临床试验和结果测量方面具有专业知识的小组成员。小组成员在两轮投票中以9分的李克特量表对每个陈述的适当性进行评级,根据小组评级的中位数和存在分歧将陈述分类为适当,不适当或不确定,然后亲自开会讨论结果,并在最后一轮批准投票中对适当和不适当的陈述进行投票。经75%或以上小组成员批准的声明被纳入最终建议。调查结果:第一轮在线调查于2024年6月21日至2024年8月6日对小组成员开放,第二轮调查于2024年11月1日至11月25日进行。2025年2月21日召开了批准会议。该小组由来自9个国家(巴西、加拿大、丹麦、德国、意大利、荷兰、西班牙、英国和美国)的16名专家(12名[75%]男性和4名[25%]女性)组成,专长为胃肠病学(n=10)、结直肠外科(n=4)和放射学(n=2)。第一轮投票的总体反应率为100%(全部16名小组成员),第二轮投票的总体反应率为94%(16名小组成员中的15名),其中16名小组成员中有12名(75%)参加了批准投票。第一次调查包含116个陈述,其中88个(76%)被评为合适,2个(2%)被评为不合适,26个(22%)被评为不确定。在第二次调查的122个陈述中,97个(80%)被评为合适,2个(2%)被评为不合适,23个(19%)不确定。批准会议共表决了79项声明,其中67项(85%)获得批准。推荐用于超声评价的解剖部位为吻合口远端的结肠段、新末端回肠、新末端回肠入口、吻合口的结肠和回肠盲侧、超声可见的结肠段和周围的肠系膜。推荐的评估参数为肠壁厚度、肠壁分层、肠壁血管状况;肠系膜炎性脂肪及淋巴结病;腔的狭窄;并发症的存在(脓肿、炎性肿块、瘘管或窦道、狭窄和狭窄长度、狭窄扩张)。小肠超声结果在新末端回肠和新末端回肠入口被认为最有可能反映临床有意义的疾病活动。建议术后至少等待4周进行肠道超声检查,以避免将超声检查结果与术后立即并发症或手术愈合相关的变化混淆。第一次评估建议在手术后3-12个月进行。解释:这些多学科建议旨在规范肠超声评估肠回结肠切除术后克罗恩病复发的应用。未来开发可靠、有效的克罗恩病术后复发指标是重要的下一步。资助:强生创新医药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
50.30
自引率
1.10%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology is an authoritative forum for key opinion leaders across medicine, government, and health systems to influence clinical practice, explore global policy, and inform constructive, positive change worldwide. The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology publishes papers that reflect the rich variety of ongoing clinical research in these fields, especially in the areas of inflammatory bowel diseases, NAFLD and NASH, functional gastrointestinal disorders, digestive cancers, and viral hepatitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书