Metaphors of Health System Resilience as Tools for Preparedness Imagination.

IF 1.4 3区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS
Kristiina Janhonen, Aino Rantamäki
{"title":"Metaphors of Health System Resilience as Tools for Preparedness Imagination.","authors":"Kristiina Janhonen, Aino Rantamäki","doi":"10.1007/s10728-026-00569-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article explores how metaphor-based frameworks can enrich understanding of health system resilience and stimulate preparedness imagination, a reflexive practice aimed at generating innovative approaches for facing unknown threats. Observing that uncertainty is narrowly defined in resilience discussions, this study uses an abductive research approach to navigate surprises and creatively adapt knowledge. We propose four metaphors-sailing turbulent seas, zen-like fencing, evolving species, and jazz orchestras-as lenses to view resilience, each bringing unique insights into managing unforeseen crises. In a two-stage process, we began with associative writing, drawing on diverse experiences to question how resilience might manifest in contexts outside healthcare. This was followed by theoretical interpretations, inspired by Dewey's pragmatist learning theory, complexity thinking, and resilience literature. To conclude, we argue that metaphors challenge conventional thinking, detaching from established concepts and definitions to reveal fresh perspectives. The article offers theoretical and practical suggestions for advancing health system resilience, with relevance for training professionals in crisis preparedness and leadership. By treating metaphor development as a form of abductive theorizing, the study positions creative reframing not as an artistic supplement but as a systematic mode of conceptual inquiry essential for advancing resilience scholarship. This conceptual contribution expands the theoretical foundations on which future empirical research, operational models, and preparedness assessments can be built, thereby strengthening the scientific understanding of how health systems can navigate profound uncertainty.</p>","PeriodicalId":46740,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-026-00569-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores how metaphor-based frameworks can enrich understanding of health system resilience and stimulate preparedness imagination, a reflexive practice aimed at generating innovative approaches for facing unknown threats. Observing that uncertainty is narrowly defined in resilience discussions, this study uses an abductive research approach to navigate surprises and creatively adapt knowledge. We propose four metaphors-sailing turbulent seas, zen-like fencing, evolving species, and jazz orchestras-as lenses to view resilience, each bringing unique insights into managing unforeseen crises. In a two-stage process, we began with associative writing, drawing on diverse experiences to question how resilience might manifest in contexts outside healthcare. This was followed by theoretical interpretations, inspired by Dewey's pragmatist learning theory, complexity thinking, and resilience literature. To conclude, we argue that metaphors challenge conventional thinking, detaching from established concepts and definitions to reveal fresh perspectives. The article offers theoretical and practical suggestions for advancing health system resilience, with relevance for training professionals in crisis preparedness and leadership. By treating metaphor development as a form of abductive theorizing, the study positions creative reframing not as an artistic supplement but as a systematic mode of conceptual inquiry essential for advancing resilience scholarship. This conceptual contribution expands the theoretical foundations on which future empirical research, operational models, and preparedness assessments can be built, thereby strengthening the scientific understanding of how health systems can navigate profound uncertainty.

卫生系统弹性作为防范工具的隐喻想象。
本文探讨了基于隐喻的框架如何能够丰富对卫生系统复原力的理解并激发防范想象力,这是一种旨在产生面对未知威胁的创新方法的反思性实践。观察到不确定性在弹性讨论中被狭义地定义,本研究使用溯因研究方法来导航惊喜并创造性地适应知识。我们提出了四个比喻——在汹涌的海洋中航行、禅宗般的击剑、进化的物种和爵士乐团——作为观察韧性的镜头,每个比喻都为管理不可预见的危机带来了独特的见解。在两个阶段的过程中,我们从联想写作开始,利用不同的经验来质疑弹性如何在医疗保健以外的环境中表现出来。其次是理论解释,受到杜威实用主义学习理论、复杂性思维和弹性文学的启发。总之,我们认为隐喻挑战了传统思维,脱离了既定的概念和定义,揭示了新的视角。这篇文章为提高卫生系统的复原力提供了理论和实践建议,与培训危机准备和领导方面的专业人员有关。通过将隐喻发展视为一种溯因理论的形式,该研究将创造性重构定位为推进弹性学术必不可少的概念探究的系统模式,而不是艺术补充。这一概念贡献扩展了未来实证研究、操作模型和防备评估可在其上建立的理论基础,从而加强了对卫生系统如何应对严重不确定性的科学理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊介绍: Health Care Analysis is a journal that promotes dialogue and debate about conceptual and normative issues related to health and health care, including health systems, healthcare provision, health law, public policy and health, professional health practice, health services organization and decision-making, and health-related education at all levels of clinical medicine, public health and global health. Health Care Analysis seeks to support the conversation between philosophy and policy, in particular illustrating the importance of conceptual and normative analysis to health policy, practice and research. As such, papers accepted for publication are likely to analyse philosophical questions related to health, health care or health policy that focus on one or more of the following: aims or ends, theories, frameworks, concepts, principles, values or ideology. All styles of theoretical analysis are welcome providing that they illuminate conceptual or normative issues and encourage debate between those interested in health, philosophy and policy. Papers must be rigorous, but should strive for accessibility – with care being taken to ensure that their arguments and implications are plain to a broad academic and international audience. In addition to purely theoretical papers, papers grounded in empirical research or case-studies are very welcome so long as they explore the conceptual or normative implications of such work. Authors are encouraged, where possible, to have regard to the social contexts of the issues they are discussing, and all authors should ensure that they indicate the ‘real world’ implications of their work. Health Care Analysis publishes contributions from philosophers, lawyers, social scientists, healthcare educators, healthcare professionals and administrators, and other health-related academics and policy analysts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书