{"title":"Metaphors of Health System Resilience as Tools for Preparedness Imagination.","authors":"Kristiina Janhonen, Aino Rantamäki","doi":"10.1007/s10728-026-00569-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article explores how metaphor-based frameworks can enrich understanding of health system resilience and stimulate preparedness imagination, a reflexive practice aimed at generating innovative approaches for facing unknown threats. Observing that uncertainty is narrowly defined in resilience discussions, this study uses an abductive research approach to navigate surprises and creatively adapt knowledge. We propose four metaphors-sailing turbulent seas, zen-like fencing, evolving species, and jazz orchestras-as lenses to view resilience, each bringing unique insights into managing unforeseen crises. In a two-stage process, we began with associative writing, drawing on diverse experiences to question how resilience might manifest in contexts outside healthcare. This was followed by theoretical interpretations, inspired by Dewey's pragmatist learning theory, complexity thinking, and resilience literature. To conclude, we argue that metaphors challenge conventional thinking, detaching from established concepts and definitions to reveal fresh perspectives. The article offers theoretical and practical suggestions for advancing health system resilience, with relevance for training professionals in crisis preparedness and leadership. By treating metaphor development as a form of abductive theorizing, the study positions creative reframing not as an artistic supplement but as a systematic mode of conceptual inquiry essential for advancing resilience scholarship. This conceptual contribution expands the theoretical foundations on which future empirical research, operational models, and preparedness assessments can be built, thereby strengthening the scientific understanding of how health systems can navigate profound uncertainty.</p>","PeriodicalId":46740,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-026-00569-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article explores how metaphor-based frameworks can enrich understanding of health system resilience and stimulate preparedness imagination, a reflexive practice aimed at generating innovative approaches for facing unknown threats. Observing that uncertainty is narrowly defined in resilience discussions, this study uses an abductive research approach to navigate surprises and creatively adapt knowledge. We propose four metaphors-sailing turbulent seas, zen-like fencing, evolving species, and jazz orchestras-as lenses to view resilience, each bringing unique insights into managing unforeseen crises. In a two-stage process, we began with associative writing, drawing on diverse experiences to question how resilience might manifest in contexts outside healthcare. This was followed by theoretical interpretations, inspired by Dewey's pragmatist learning theory, complexity thinking, and resilience literature. To conclude, we argue that metaphors challenge conventional thinking, detaching from established concepts and definitions to reveal fresh perspectives. The article offers theoretical and practical suggestions for advancing health system resilience, with relevance for training professionals in crisis preparedness and leadership. By treating metaphor development as a form of abductive theorizing, the study positions creative reframing not as an artistic supplement but as a systematic mode of conceptual inquiry essential for advancing resilience scholarship. This conceptual contribution expands the theoretical foundations on which future empirical research, operational models, and preparedness assessments can be built, thereby strengthening the scientific understanding of how health systems can navigate profound uncertainty.
期刊介绍:
Health Care Analysis is a journal that promotes dialogue and debate about conceptual and normative issues related to health and health care, including health systems, healthcare provision, health law, public policy and health, professional health practice, health services organization and decision-making, and health-related education at all levels of clinical medicine, public health and global health. Health Care Analysis seeks to support the conversation between philosophy and policy, in particular illustrating the importance of conceptual and normative analysis to health policy, practice and research. As such, papers accepted for publication are likely to analyse philosophical questions related to health, health care or health policy that focus on one or more of the following: aims or ends, theories, frameworks, concepts, principles, values or ideology. All styles of theoretical analysis are welcome providing that they illuminate conceptual or normative issues and encourage debate between those interested in health, philosophy and policy. Papers must be rigorous, but should strive for accessibility – with care being taken to ensure that their arguments and implications are plain to a broad academic and international audience. In addition to purely theoretical papers, papers grounded in empirical research or case-studies are very welcome so long as they explore the conceptual or normative implications of such work. Authors are encouraged, where possible, to have regard to the social contexts of the issues they are discussing, and all authors should ensure that they indicate the ‘real world’ implications of their work. Health Care Analysis publishes contributions from philosophers, lawyers, social scientists, healthcare educators, healthcare professionals and administrators, and other health-related academics and policy analysts.