Menu Assessment in Early Childhood Education and Care: A Conversation With Australian Early Childhood Nutrition Professionals

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Penelope Clark, Natasha Meerding, Kate DePaoli, Claire Galloway
{"title":"Menu Assessment in Early Childhood Education and Care: A Conversation With Australian Early Childhood Nutrition Professionals","authors":"Penelope Clark,&nbsp;Natasha Meerding,&nbsp;Kate DePaoli,&nbsp;Claire Galloway","doi":"10.1002/hpja.70199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Issue Addressed</h3>\n \n <p>Early childhood education and care (ECEC) services that provide food play a crucial role in the nutritional health of the children they care for. However, the wording of the standards, regulations and guidelines to support nutritious food provision in Australian ECECs are open to interpretation. The menu assessment process is also resource intensive and inconsistently managed across jurisdictions (e.g., free government service in some jurisdictions and fee-for-service through not-for-profit or private business elsewhere). This study explores how Australian nutrition professionals manage the menu assessment process in different jurisdictions and their level of support for developing a nationally consistent, simplified menu assessment process.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Australian early childhood nutrition professionals with experience in conducting ECEC menu assessments or developing nutrition guidelines for this setting were eligible for this study. Participants were identified through convenience and snowball sampling. Semi-structured online interviews, each lasting 45 min, were conducted. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and thematic analysis performed using inductive and deductive coding.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Thirteen early childhood nutrition professionals working in Australia participated, with at least one representative from each jurisdiction. The study found significant variation in menu assessment processes despite nutrition professionals following similar guidelines. Respondents highlighted the perceived aspirational nature of the nutrition guidelines, barriers to achieving them, such as cost, literacy and computer literacy, and possible benefits of simplified assessment tools and methods. The study also identified other themes such as the importance of responsive feeding and consideration of the broader food environment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Current processes for conducting ECEC menu assessments vary across Australia. There was consensus among the ECEC nutrition professionals interviewed for developing a nationally consistent, simplified menu assessment process.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> So What?</h3>\n \n <p>A nationally consistent, simplified menu assessment process could improve the quality of food provision in ECEC services, reduce the current resource-intensive and inconsistent approaches across jurisdictions and strengthen nutrition outcomes for the children in their care. This research will inform future menu assessment processes in Tasmania.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47379,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","volume":"37 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hpja.70199","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Issue Addressed

Early childhood education and care (ECEC) services that provide food play a crucial role in the nutritional health of the children they care for. However, the wording of the standards, regulations and guidelines to support nutritious food provision in Australian ECECs are open to interpretation. The menu assessment process is also resource intensive and inconsistently managed across jurisdictions (e.g., free government service in some jurisdictions and fee-for-service through not-for-profit or private business elsewhere). This study explores how Australian nutrition professionals manage the menu assessment process in different jurisdictions and their level of support for developing a nationally consistent, simplified menu assessment process.

Methods

Australian early childhood nutrition professionals with experience in conducting ECEC menu assessments or developing nutrition guidelines for this setting were eligible for this study. Participants were identified through convenience and snowball sampling. Semi-structured online interviews, each lasting 45 min, were conducted. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and thematic analysis performed using inductive and deductive coding.

Results

Thirteen early childhood nutrition professionals working in Australia participated, with at least one representative from each jurisdiction. The study found significant variation in menu assessment processes despite nutrition professionals following similar guidelines. Respondents highlighted the perceived aspirational nature of the nutrition guidelines, barriers to achieving them, such as cost, literacy and computer literacy, and possible benefits of simplified assessment tools and methods. The study also identified other themes such as the importance of responsive feeding and consideration of the broader food environment.

Conclusions

Current processes for conducting ECEC menu assessments vary across Australia. There was consensus among the ECEC nutrition professionals interviewed for developing a nationally consistent, simplified menu assessment process.

So What?

A nationally consistent, simplified menu assessment process could improve the quality of food provision in ECEC services, reduce the current resource-intensive and inconsistent approaches across jurisdictions and strengthen nutrition outcomes for the children in their care. This research will inform future menu assessment processes in Tasmania.

早期儿童教育和护理的菜单评估:与澳大利亚早期儿童营养专业人士的对话。
所处理的问题:提供食物的幼儿教育和照料服务在其所照料的儿童的营养健康方面发挥着至关重要的作用。然而,支持澳大利亚ecec提供营养食品的标准、法规和指南的措辞是开放的解释。菜单评估过程也是资源密集型的,而且在各个司法管辖区的管理也不一致(例如,在一些司法管辖区提供免费的政府服务,而在其他地方通过非营利或私营企业收取服务费用)。本研究探讨了澳大利亚营养专业人员如何在不同的司法管辖区管理菜单评估过程,以及他们对制定全国一致的简化菜单评估过程的支持程度。方法:具有开展ECEC菜单评估或为该环境制定营养指南经验的澳大利亚幼儿营养专业人员符合本研究的资格。通过方便和滚雪球抽样来确定参与者。进行了半结构化的在线访谈,每次持续45分钟。访谈被记录、转录,并使用归纳和演绎编码进行主题分析。结果:13名在澳大利亚工作的儿童早期营养专家参与了研究,每个辖区至少有一名代表。研究发现,尽管营养专家遵循类似的指导方针,但菜单评估过程存在显著差异。答复者强调了营养指南的理想性质,实现这些指南的障碍,如成本、识字和计算机识字,以及简化评估工具和方法的可能好处。该研究还确定了其他主题,如反应性喂养的重要性和对更广泛的食物环境的考虑。结论:目前在澳大利亚进行ECEC菜单评估的过程各不相同。ECEC接受采访的营养专业人士一致认为,应该制定一个全国统一的、简化的菜单评估过程。那又怎样?全国统一的简化菜单评估程序可以提高ECEC服务中食品供应的质量,减少目前各司法管辖区之间资源密集型和不一致的方法,并加强其所照顾儿童的营养结果。这项研究将为塔斯马尼亚州未来的菜单评估过程提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Promotion Journal of Australia
Health Promotion Journal of Australia PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.50%
发文量
115
期刊介绍: The purpose of the Health Promotion Journal of Australia is to facilitate communication between researchers, practitioners, and policymakers involved in health promotion activities. Preference for publication is given to practical examples of policies, theories, strategies and programs which utilise educational, organisational, economic and/or environmental approaches to health promotion. The journal also publishes brief reports discussing programs, professional viewpoints, and guidelines for practice or evaluation methodology. The journal features articles, brief reports, editorials, perspectives, "of interest", viewpoints, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书