Meg C Lovejoy, Ekaterina L Koelliker, Emma A Askew, Jana Zeineddine, Maria Yialamas, Jonathan B Greer, Stephanie L Nitzschke, Keith D Lillemoe, Erika L Rangel
{"title":"Flexibility Stigma and the Double Bind of Family Formation in Medical and Surgical Residency.","authors":"Meg C Lovejoy, Ekaterina L Koelliker, Emma A Askew, Jana Zeineddine, Maria Yialamas, Jonathan B Greer, Stephanie L Nitzschke, Keith D Lillemoe, Erika L Rangel","doi":"10.1097/XCS.0000000000002046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Persistent burnout, attrition, and mistreatment among pregnant and parenting medical trainees suggest structural deficiencies in training environments. Flexibility stigma-bias against individuals using work-life accommodations within cultures defined by constant availability-may limit the effectiveness of existing policies.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Six-month ethnographic study across 2 internal medicine and 2 general surgery residency programs at 2 academic teaching hospitals. Data were collected through site observations, focus groups, and semi-structured interviews examining program culture, work-life challenges, and accommodation use. Participants included 28 residents who were pregnant or parents of an infant aged 1 year or younger, 23 residents without infants, and 13 program leaders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Flexibility stigma was pervasive across sites, where use of accommodations-particularly for parenting-was perceived as signaling reduced commitment to ideal resident norms of self-sacrifice and constant availability. Anticipated reputational harm led many trainees to forgo accommodations despite consequences for pregnancy health, parenting, relationships, and self-care. Trainees described \"double binds\" between professional expectations and essential personal goals, including becoming a parent, meeting perceived parenting standards, maintaining healthy pregnancies, sustaining relationships, and preserving basic well-being. Program-level factors, including staffing models, scheduling practices, policy communication, community culture, and leadership behavior, variably intensified or mitigated these pressures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Flexibility stigma functions as a structural barrier that limits accommodation uptake and exacerbates competing demands on pregnant and parenting residents. Addressing both cultural norms and program design is necessary to improve trainee well-being, support family formation, and advance equity in surgical and medical training.</p>","PeriodicalId":17140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":"1095-1107"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XCS.0000000000002046","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Persistent burnout, attrition, and mistreatment among pregnant and parenting medical trainees suggest structural deficiencies in training environments. Flexibility stigma-bias against individuals using work-life accommodations within cultures defined by constant availability-may limit the effectiveness of existing policies.
Study design: Six-month ethnographic study across 2 internal medicine and 2 general surgery residency programs at 2 academic teaching hospitals. Data were collected through site observations, focus groups, and semi-structured interviews examining program culture, work-life challenges, and accommodation use. Participants included 28 residents who were pregnant or parents of an infant aged 1 year or younger, 23 residents without infants, and 13 program leaders.
Results: Flexibility stigma was pervasive across sites, where use of accommodations-particularly for parenting-was perceived as signaling reduced commitment to ideal resident norms of self-sacrifice and constant availability. Anticipated reputational harm led many trainees to forgo accommodations despite consequences for pregnancy health, parenting, relationships, and self-care. Trainees described "double binds" between professional expectations and essential personal goals, including becoming a parent, meeting perceived parenting standards, maintaining healthy pregnancies, sustaining relationships, and preserving basic well-being. Program-level factors, including staffing models, scheduling practices, policy communication, community culture, and leadership behavior, variably intensified or mitigated these pressures.
Conclusions: Flexibility stigma functions as a structural barrier that limits accommodation uptake and exacerbates competing demands on pregnant and parenting residents. Addressing both cultural norms and program design is necessary to improve trainee well-being, support family formation, and advance equity in surgical and medical training.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the American College of Surgeons (JACS) is a monthly journal publishing peer-reviewed original contributions on all aspects of surgery. These contributions include, but are not limited to, original clinical studies, review articles, and experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance. In general, case reports are not considered for publication. As the official scientific journal of the American College of Surgeons, JACS has the goal of providing its readership the highest quality rapid retrieval of information relevant to surgeons.