Flexibility Stigma and the Double Bind of Family Formation in Medical and Surgical Residency.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Meg C Lovejoy, Ekaterina L Koelliker, Emma A Askew, Jana Zeineddine, Maria Yialamas, Jonathan B Greer, Stephanie L Nitzschke, Keith D Lillemoe, Erika L Rangel
{"title":"Flexibility Stigma and the Double Bind of Family Formation in Medical and Surgical Residency.","authors":"Meg C Lovejoy, Ekaterina L Koelliker, Emma A Askew, Jana Zeineddine, Maria Yialamas, Jonathan B Greer, Stephanie L Nitzschke, Keith D Lillemoe, Erika L Rangel","doi":"10.1097/XCS.0000000000002046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Persistent burnout, attrition, and mistreatment among pregnant and parenting medical trainees suggest structural deficiencies in training environments. Flexibility stigma-bias against individuals using work-life accommodations within cultures defined by constant availability-may limit the effectiveness of existing policies.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Six-month ethnographic study across 2 internal medicine and 2 general surgery residency programs at 2 academic teaching hospitals. Data were collected through site observations, focus groups, and semi-structured interviews examining program culture, work-life challenges, and accommodation use. Participants included 28 residents who were pregnant or parents of an infant aged 1 year or younger, 23 residents without infants, and 13 program leaders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Flexibility stigma was pervasive across sites, where use of accommodations-particularly for parenting-was perceived as signaling reduced commitment to ideal resident norms of self-sacrifice and constant availability. Anticipated reputational harm led many trainees to forgo accommodations despite consequences for pregnancy health, parenting, relationships, and self-care. Trainees described \"double binds\" between professional expectations and essential personal goals, including becoming a parent, meeting perceived parenting standards, maintaining healthy pregnancies, sustaining relationships, and preserving basic well-being. Program-level factors, including staffing models, scheduling practices, policy communication, community culture, and leadership behavior, variably intensified or mitigated these pressures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Flexibility stigma functions as a structural barrier that limits accommodation uptake and exacerbates competing demands on pregnant and parenting residents. Addressing both cultural norms and program design is necessary to improve trainee well-being, support family formation, and advance equity in surgical and medical training.</p>","PeriodicalId":17140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":"1095-1107"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XCS.0000000000002046","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Persistent burnout, attrition, and mistreatment among pregnant and parenting medical trainees suggest structural deficiencies in training environments. Flexibility stigma-bias against individuals using work-life accommodations within cultures defined by constant availability-may limit the effectiveness of existing policies.

Study design: Six-month ethnographic study across 2 internal medicine and 2 general surgery residency programs at 2 academic teaching hospitals. Data were collected through site observations, focus groups, and semi-structured interviews examining program culture, work-life challenges, and accommodation use. Participants included 28 residents who were pregnant or parents of an infant aged 1 year or younger, 23 residents without infants, and 13 program leaders.

Results: Flexibility stigma was pervasive across sites, where use of accommodations-particularly for parenting-was perceived as signaling reduced commitment to ideal resident norms of self-sacrifice and constant availability. Anticipated reputational harm led many trainees to forgo accommodations despite consequences for pregnancy health, parenting, relationships, and self-care. Trainees described "double binds" between professional expectations and essential personal goals, including becoming a parent, meeting perceived parenting standards, maintaining healthy pregnancies, sustaining relationships, and preserving basic well-being. Program-level factors, including staffing models, scheduling practices, policy communication, community culture, and leadership behavior, variably intensified or mitigated these pressures.

Conclusions: Flexibility stigma functions as a structural barrier that limits accommodation uptake and exacerbates competing demands on pregnant and parenting residents. Addressing both cultural norms and program design is necessary to improve trainee well-being, support family formation, and advance equity in surgical and medical training.

灵活性、污名与医外科住院医师家庭形成的双重束缚。
背景:在怀孕和养育子女的医疗培训生中,持续的倦怠、减员和虐待表明培训环境存在结构性缺陷。灵活性的污名——在由持续可用性定义的文化中,对个人使用工作与生活相适应的偏见——可能会限制现有政策的有效性。研究设计:为期六个月的人种学研究,涉及两家学术教学医院的两个内科和两个普通外科住院医师项目。通过现场观察、焦点小组和半结构化访谈收集数据,考察项目文化、工作生活挑战和住宿使用情况。参与者包括28名怀孕或有1岁以下婴儿的住院医师,23名没有婴儿的住院医师和13名项目负责人。结果:灵活性的污名在各个地点普遍存在,在这些地方,住宿的使用——特别是对父母来说——被认为是对自我牺牲和持续可用性的理想居住规范的承诺减少的信号。由于预期声誉受损,许多受训者不顾怀孕健康、养育子女、人际关系和自我照顾的后果,放弃了住宿。受训人员描述了职业期望和基本个人目标之间的“双重约束”,包括成为父母、达到公认的育儿标准、保持健康怀孕、维持关系和维护基本福祉。项目层面的因素,包括人员配置模式、调度实践、政策沟通、社区文化和领导行为,都不同程度地加剧或减轻了这些压力。结论:灵活性耻辱感作为一种结构性障碍,限制了住宿的吸收,加剧了孕妇和育儿居民的竞争需求。解决文化规范和方案设计是必要的,以提高受训者的福祉,支持家庭的形成,并促进公平的外科和医疗培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.80%
发文量
1515
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American College of Surgeons (JACS) is a monthly journal publishing peer-reviewed original contributions on all aspects of surgery. These contributions include, but are not limited to, original clinical studies, review articles, and experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance. In general, case reports are not considered for publication. As the official scientific journal of the American College of Surgeons, JACS has the goal of providing its readership the highest quality rapid retrieval of information relevant to surgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书