Residual-Based Sieve Maximum Full Likelihood Estimation for the Proportional Hazards Model.

IF 0.9 4区 数学 Q4 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY
Taehwa Choi, Susan Halabi, Hyotae Kim, Yuan Wu
{"title":"Residual-Based Sieve Maximum Full Likelihood Estimation for the Proportional Hazards Model.","authors":"Taehwa Choi, Susan Halabi, Hyotae Kim, Yuan Wu","doi":"10.1080/03610926.2026.2618622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The partial likelihood approach is the gold standard approach for estimating regression parameters in proportional hazards model, largely because it avoids specifying the baseline hazard function. However, this approach can lack robustness in the presence of model mis-specification, outliers, or high censoring rates. To address these limitations, we propose a sieve maximum full likelihood estimation method for the proportional hazards model. Our two-step procedure approximates the cumulative hazard function using piecewise polynomials, enabling simultaneous estimation of all model parameters within a single likelihood framework. Unlike the partial likelihood, our method employs the full likelihood to enhance robustness and efficiency, particularly when assumptions are violated or data are heavily censored. We use the profile likelihood to estimate variance and introduce an efficient information criterion for selecting the optimal degree of freedom for the sieve space. Extensive simulations demonstrate that our approach outperforms both partial and existing full likelihood methods under the proportional and non-proportional hazards settings. We illustrate the usefulness of the method using data from real applications in bladder and breast cancer. This approach provides a flexible alternative for survival analysis, particularly when standard methods may be insufficient due to data outliers or violation of model assumptions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10531,"journal":{"name":"Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13186201/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2026.2618622","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The partial likelihood approach is the gold standard approach for estimating regression parameters in proportional hazards model, largely because it avoids specifying the baseline hazard function. However, this approach can lack robustness in the presence of model mis-specification, outliers, or high censoring rates. To address these limitations, we propose a sieve maximum full likelihood estimation method for the proportional hazards model. Our two-step procedure approximates the cumulative hazard function using piecewise polynomials, enabling simultaneous estimation of all model parameters within a single likelihood framework. Unlike the partial likelihood, our method employs the full likelihood to enhance robustness and efficiency, particularly when assumptions are violated or data are heavily censored. We use the profile likelihood to estimate variance and introduce an efficient information criterion for selecting the optimal degree of freedom for the sieve space. Extensive simulations demonstrate that our approach outperforms both partial and existing full likelihood methods under the proportional and non-proportional hazards settings. We illustrate the usefulness of the method using data from real applications in bladder and breast cancer. This approach provides a flexible alternative for survival analysis, particularly when standard methods may be insufficient due to data outliers or violation of model assumptions.

基于残差的比例风险模型筛最大全似然估计。
部分似然法是估计比例风险模型回归参数的金标准方法,很大程度上是因为它避免了指定基线风险函数。然而,这种方法在存在模型错误规范、异常值或高审查率时可能缺乏鲁棒性。为了解决这些局限性,我们提出了比例风险模型的筛最大全似然估计方法。我们的两步程序使用分段多项式近似累积风险函数,从而能够在单个似然框架内同时估计所有模型参数。与部分似然不同,我们的方法采用全似然来提高鲁棒性和效率,特别是当假设被违反或数据被严格审查时。我们使用轮廓似然来估计方差,并引入一个有效的信息准则来选择筛空间的最优自由度。大量的模拟表明,在比例和非比例风险设置下,我们的方法优于部分和现有的全似然方法。我们用膀胱癌和乳腺癌的实际应用数据来说明该方法的实用性。这种方法为生存分析提供了一种灵活的选择,特别是当标准方法可能由于数据异常值或违反模型假设而不足时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
320
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Theory and Methods series intends to publish papers that make theoretical and methodological advances in Probability and Statistics. New applications of statistical and probabilistic methods will also be considered for publication. In addition, special issues dedicated to a specific topic of current interest will also be published in this series periodically, providing an exhaustive and up-to-date review of that topic to the readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书