Postoperative multimodal pain management: a narrative review of current practices, clinical and educational gaps, and future directions.

Frontiers in anesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-18 DOI:10.3389/fanes.2025.1709252
Braden M Lopez, Brent M Lee, Michael D Miller, Mohab M Ibrahim, Todd W Vanderah, Arthur C Riegel
{"title":"Postoperative multimodal pain management: a narrative review of current practices, clinical and educational gaps, and future directions.","authors":"Braden M Lopez, Brent M Lee, Michael D Miller, Mohab M Ibrahim, Todd W Vanderah, Arthur C Riegel","doi":"10.3389/fanes.2025.1709252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pain is among the most commonly reported side effects following surgical interventions; however, its management remains a significant challenge due to its multifaceted nature, with studies indicating that up to 80% of surgical patients experience inadequate pain control. Although multimodal pain management (MMPM) is widely recommended as a tool to help mitigate the ongoing opioid epidemic, a universally standardized approach for pain management is lacking and highly dependent on individual clinician practices. Pain perception is inherently subjective, and while objective measurement tools are emerging, self-reported pain scales continue to dominate clinical practice. Differences in pain perception, further complicate efforts to standardize care, demonstrating the need for personalized approaches. Notably, there is a deficiency in surgical education regarding formalized training in postoperative pain management, which leaves medical students and residents without a concrete foundation in evidence-based pain management strategies. This narrative review explores the pathophysiology of pain, evaluates current recommendations in surgery, and emphasizes preoperative optimization. It also argues for, and underscores the necessity for, comprehensive and structured pain management education across all surgical specialties. Furthermore, the review identifies future directions, particularly in pain prediction and the development of surgical guidelines that can facilitate a comprehensive pain management framework while accommodating patient-specific modifications.</p>","PeriodicalId":521030,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in anesthesiology","volume":"4 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13183406/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fanes.2025.1709252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pain is among the most commonly reported side effects following surgical interventions; however, its management remains a significant challenge due to its multifaceted nature, with studies indicating that up to 80% of surgical patients experience inadequate pain control. Although multimodal pain management (MMPM) is widely recommended as a tool to help mitigate the ongoing opioid epidemic, a universally standardized approach for pain management is lacking and highly dependent on individual clinician practices. Pain perception is inherently subjective, and while objective measurement tools are emerging, self-reported pain scales continue to dominate clinical practice. Differences in pain perception, further complicate efforts to standardize care, demonstrating the need for personalized approaches. Notably, there is a deficiency in surgical education regarding formalized training in postoperative pain management, which leaves medical students and residents without a concrete foundation in evidence-based pain management strategies. This narrative review explores the pathophysiology of pain, evaluates current recommendations in surgery, and emphasizes preoperative optimization. It also argues for, and underscores the necessity for, comprehensive and structured pain management education across all surgical specialties. Furthermore, the review identifies future directions, particularly in pain prediction and the development of surgical guidelines that can facilitate a comprehensive pain management framework while accommodating patient-specific modifications.

术后多模态疼痛管理:当前实践,临床和教育差距和未来方向的叙述回顾。
疼痛是手术干预后最常见的副作用之一;然而,由于其多面性,其管理仍然是一个重大挑战,研究表明,高达80%的手术患者疼痛控制不足。尽管多模式疼痛管理(MMPM)被广泛推荐作为一种工具来帮助减轻持续的阿片类药物流行,但缺乏一种普遍标准化的疼痛管理方法,并且高度依赖于个体临床医生的实践。疼痛感知本质上是主观的,而客观的测量工具正在出现,自我报告的疼痛量表继续主导临床实践。疼痛感知的差异,进一步复杂化了标准化护理的努力,表明需要个性化的方法。值得注意的是,关于术后疼痛管理的正式培训的外科教育缺乏,这使得医科学生和住院医生在循证疼痛管理策略方面缺乏具体的基础。这篇叙述性综述探讨了疼痛的病理生理学,评估了目前的手术建议,并强调了术前优化。它还主张并强调在所有外科专科进行全面和结构化的疼痛管理教育的必要性。此外,回顾确定了未来的方向,特别是在疼痛预测和手术指南的发展,可以促进全面的疼痛管理框架,同时适应患者特定的修改。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书