Implementation of a robotic single-staple technique for colorectal anastomosis: Technical description and initial institutional experience

Cirugia espanola Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-20 DOI:10.1016/j.cireng.2026.800349
Alba García Chiloeches, Marcos Gómez Ruiz, Isabel Cifrián Canales, Carmen Cagigas Fernández
{"title":"Implementation of a robotic single-staple technique for colorectal anastomosis: Technical description and initial institutional experience","authors":"Alba García Chiloeches,&nbsp;Marcos Gómez Ruiz,&nbsp;Isabel Cifrián Canales,&nbsp;Carmen Cagigas Fernández","doi":"10.1016/j.cireng.2026.800349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Anastomotic leakage remains one of the most relevant complications after low rectal surgery, with a considerable negative impact on morbidity, mortality, quality of life, and healthcare resources. The widely adopted double-stapling technique is limited by technical drawbacks, particularly the intersection of staple lines, which creates areas of structural weakness and has been associated with an increased risk of leakage. To address these limitations, single-stapling techniques have been developed, including transanal transection with single-stapled anastomosis (TTSS) and other variants. We report our initial institutional experience with the robotic variant of the single-stapled anastomosis. A retrospective analysis was performed including 49 patients who underwent low anterior resection, comparing the double-stapled anastomosis (n = 40) with the robotic single-stapled anastomosis (n = 9), assessing 30-day postoperative complications, anastomotic leakage, and length of hospital stay.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93935,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia espanola","volume":"104 8","pages":"Article 800349"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia espanola","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173507726001559","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anastomotic leakage remains one of the most relevant complications after low rectal surgery, with a considerable negative impact on morbidity, mortality, quality of life, and healthcare resources. The widely adopted double-stapling technique is limited by technical drawbacks, particularly the intersection of staple lines, which creates areas of structural weakness and has been associated with an increased risk of leakage. To address these limitations, single-stapling techniques have been developed, including transanal transection with single-stapled anastomosis (TTSS) and other variants. We report our initial institutional experience with the robotic variant of the single-stapled anastomosis. A retrospective analysis was performed including 49 patients who underwent low anterior resection, comparing the double-stapled anastomosis (n = 40) with the robotic single-stapled anastomosis (n = 9), assessing 30-day postoperative complications, anastomotic leakage, and length of hospital stay.
机器人单钉结直肠吻合术的实现:技术描述和初步机构经验。
吻合口瘘是低位直肠手术后最常见的并发症之一,对患者的发病率、死亡率、生活质量和医疗资源都有相当大的负面影响。广泛采用的双钉接技术受到技术缺陷的限制,特别是钉线相交,会产生结构薄弱的区域,并增加泄漏的风险。为了解决这些局限性,已经开发了单吻合器技术,包括经肛门横断单吻合器吻合术(TTSS)和其他变体。我们报告我们的初步机构经验与机器人变种的单钉吻合术。回顾性分析49例低位前切除术患者,比较双吻合器吻合术(n = 40)和机器人单吻合术(n = 9),评估术后30天并发症、吻合口漏和住院时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书