Enhancing Resident Preparedness for the American Board of Surgery Certifying Exam Through Low-Stakes Mock Oral Sessions.

HCA healthcare journal of medicine Pub Date : 2026-04-01 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.36518/2689-0216.2326
Camila R Guetter, Taylor Locklear, Omar Haque, P Nina Scalise, Saptarshi Biswas, R Wesley Vosburg
{"title":"Enhancing Resident Preparedness for the American Board of Surgery Certifying Exam Through Low-Stakes Mock Oral Sessions.","authors":"Camila R Guetter, Taylor Locklear, Omar Haque, P Nina Scalise, Saptarshi Biswas, R Wesley Vosburg","doi":"10.36518/2689-0216.2326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The American Board of Surgery (ABS) requires trainees to pass both a written qualifying examination (ABSQE) and oral certifying examination (ABSCE) to achieve board certification. The high-stakes nature of the ABSCE, which assesses knowledge, clinical judgment, and decision-making, necessitates extensive preparation. To address the challenges of the ABSCE format and associated trainee stress, structured mock oral programs have been developed. Here we evaluate the impact of structured mock oral sessions on residents' comfort levels and familiarity with the ABSCE at a single institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods survey was given to 50 general surgery residents in different training years who participated in 1-hour individual mock oral sessions with an attending surgeon between August 2021 and February 2024. The survey assessed demographic information, previous oral board practice experience, confidence describing the test format, and identified common pitfalls before and after the session. Statistical analyses using McNemar's chi-square test and a thematic analysis of open-ended responses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed a significant increase (70% of participants) in residents' reported confidence while describing the ABSCE format and identifying common pitfalls (68% of participants) after the sessions, compared to pre-implementation of the mock oral practice sessions. Many residents (97.9%) found value in frequent mock oral sessions. Residents identified insufficient practice, clinical experience, and time for preparation as barriers to their success.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Repeated, low-stakes mock oral practice sessions and protected educational time are valued by residents and could enhance examination readiness, thereby improving ABSCE pass rates (68%, prior to the 1:1 mock oral sessions, to 83% after the sessions were implemented). Future studies should explore the nationwide impact of integrating regular formal mock oral sessions into surgical residency programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":73198,"journal":{"name":"HCA healthcare journal of medicine","volume":"7 2","pages":"119-124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13182946/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HCA healthcare journal of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36518/2689-0216.2326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The American Board of Surgery (ABS) requires trainees to pass both a written qualifying examination (ABSQE) and oral certifying examination (ABSCE) to achieve board certification. The high-stakes nature of the ABSCE, which assesses knowledge, clinical judgment, and decision-making, necessitates extensive preparation. To address the challenges of the ABSCE format and associated trainee stress, structured mock oral programs have been developed. Here we evaluate the impact of structured mock oral sessions on residents' comfort levels and familiarity with the ABSCE at a single institution.

Methods: A mixed-methods survey was given to 50 general surgery residents in different training years who participated in 1-hour individual mock oral sessions with an attending surgeon between August 2021 and February 2024. The survey assessed demographic information, previous oral board practice experience, confidence describing the test format, and identified common pitfalls before and after the session. Statistical analyses using McNemar's chi-square test and a thematic analysis of open-ended responses were performed.

Results: We observed a significant increase (70% of participants) in residents' reported confidence while describing the ABSCE format and identifying common pitfalls (68% of participants) after the sessions, compared to pre-implementation of the mock oral practice sessions. Many residents (97.9%) found value in frequent mock oral sessions. Residents identified insufficient practice, clinical experience, and time for preparation as barriers to their success.

Conclusion: Repeated, low-stakes mock oral practice sessions and protected educational time are valued by residents and could enhance examination readiness, thereby improving ABSCE pass rates (68%, prior to the 1:1 mock oral sessions, to 83% after the sessions were implemented). Future studies should explore the nationwide impact of integrating regular formal mock oral sessions into surgical residency programs.

通过低风险的模拟口语会话提高住院医师对美国外科委员会认证考试的准备。
背景:美国外科委员会(ABS)要求学员通过书面资格考试(ABSQE)和口头认证考试(ABSCE)来获得委员会认证。ABSCE评估知识、临床判断和决策的高风险性质需要广泛的准备。为了解决ABSCE形式的挑战和相关的学员压力,已经开发了结构化的模拟口语课程。在这里,我们评估了结构化模拟口语会话对住院医师舒适度和熟悉程度的影响。方法:采用混合方法对50名不同培训年限的普外科住院医师进行调查,这些住院医师于2021年8月至2024年2月期间在一名主治医生的指导下参加了1小时的个人模拟口腔培训。该调查评估了人口统计信息、以前的口语考试实践经验、对考试形式的信心描述,并确定了考试前后的常见陷阱。采用McNemar卡方检验进行统计分析,并对开放式回答进行专题分析。结果:我们观察到,与模拟口语练习课程实施前相比,在课程结束后,居民在描述ABSCE格式和识别常见陷阱时报告的信心(70%的参与者)(68%的参与者)显著增加。许多居民(97.9%)认为频繁的模拟口头会话有价值。住院医师认为缺乏实践、临床经验和准备时间是他们成功的障碍。结论:居民重视重复的、低风险的模拟口语练习课程和有保障的教育时间,可以提高考试准备程度,从而提高ABSCE的通过率(1:1模拟口语课程实施前为68%,课程实施后为83%)。未来的研究应该探索将常规的正式模拟口头会议纳入外科住院医师计划的全国性影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书