Camilla Blach Rossen, Bolette Emborg Jannsen, Mette Jensen Stochkendahl, David Høyrup Christiansen, Maja Husted Hubeishy
{"title":"The Implementation of the Toolbox \"Talk About Pain-Take Action Together\" to Improve Musculoskeletal Pain Management in the Workplace.","authors":"Camilla Blach Rossen, Bolette Emborg Jannsen, Mette Jensen Stochkendahl, David Høyrup Christiansen, Maja Husted Hubeishy","doi":"10.1007/s10926-026-10413-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are a leading cause of sickness absence from work and early retirement. While structured workplace dialogues about musculoskeletal pain are recommended, their implementation remains challenging. This study explored the implementation of the 'Talk About Pain-Take Action Together'' toolbox in two Danish public workplaces.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative observational implementation study informed by reflexive thematic analysis was conducted. Two workplaces with physically demanding roles were included: one with researcher-initiated implementation during the study period and one with internally initiated implementation prior to the study. Data were collected through observations, memos, emails, and four focus group interviews with 10 participants including employees, managers, and occupational safety and health consultants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Workplace 1 (WP1) implemented the toolbox, employing seven strategies: identifying and preparing champions, conducting a local needs assessment, distributing educational materials, reminding clinicians, tailoring strategies, organising implementation team meetings, and creating learning collaboratives. Key enablers included management engagement, ongoing exposure, and creating a safe environment, whereas lack of time was identified as a barrier. At workplace 2 (WP2), three strategies were employed: identifying and preparing champions, distributing educational materials, and conducting educational meetings. However, the toolbox was never fully implemented, hindered by time-related barriers, organisational restructuring, and unclear roles and responsibilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Effective implementation of workplace MSD interventions requires management engagement, time allocation, and clear roles.</p>","PeriodicalId":48035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-026-10413-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are a leading cause of sickness absence from work and early retirement. While structured workplace dialogues about musculoskeletal pain are recommended, their implementation remains challenging. This study explored the implementation of the 'Talk About Pain-Take Action Together'' toolbox in two Danish public workplaces.
Methods: Qualitative observational implementation study informed by reflexive thematic analysis was conducted. Two workplaces with physically demanding roles were included: one with researcher-initiated implementation during the study period and one with internally initiated implementation prior to the study. Data were collected through observations, memos, emails, and four focus group interviews with 10 participants including employees, managers, and occupational safety and health consultants.
Results: Workplace 1 (WP1) implemented the toolbox, employing seven strategies: identifying and preparing champions, conducting a local needs assessment, distributing educational materials, reminding clinicians, tailoring strategies, organising implementation team meetings, and creating learning collaboratives. Key enablers included management engagement, ongoing exposure, and creating a safe environment, whereas lack of time was identified as a barrier. At workplace 2 (WP2), three strategies were employed: identifying and preparing champions, distributing educational materials, and conducting educational meetings. However, the toolbox was never fully implemented, hindered by time-related barriers, organisational restructuring, and unclear roles and responsibilities.
Conclusions: Effective implementation of workplace MSD interventions requires management engagement, time allocation, and clear roles.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation is an international forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers on the rehabilitation, reintegration, and prevention of disability in workers. The journal offers investigations involving original data collection and research synthesis (i.e., scoping reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses). Papers derive from a broad array of fields including rehabilitation medicine, physical and occupational therapy, health psychology and psychiatry, orthopedics, oncology, occupational and insurance medicine, neurology, social work, ergonomics, biomedical engineering, health economics, rehabilitation engineering, business administration and management, and law. A single interdisciplinary source for information on work disability rehabilitation, the Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation helps to advance the scientific understanding, management, and prevention of work disability.