The Implementation of the Toolbox "Talk About Pain-Take Action Together" to Improve Musculoskeletal Pain Management in the Workplace.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Camilla Blach Rossen, Bolette Emborg Jannsen, Mette Jensen Stochkendahl, David Høyrup Christiansen, Maja Husted Hubeishy
{"title":"The Implementation of the Toolbox \"Talk About Pain-Take Action Together\" to Improve Musculoskeletal Pain Management in the Workplace.","authors":"Camilla Blach Rossen, Bolette Emborg Jannsen, Mette Jensen Stochkendahl, David Høyrup Christiansen, Maja Husted Hubeishy","doi":"10.1007/s10926-026-10413-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are a leading cause of sickness absence from work and early retirement. While structured workplace dialogues about musculoskeletal pain are recommended, their implementation remains challenging. This study explored the implementation of the 'Talk About Pain-Take Action Together'' toolbox in two Danish public workplaces.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative observational implementation study informed by reflexive thematic analysis was conducted. Two workplaces with physically demanding roles were included: one with researcher-initiated implementation during the study period and one with internally initiated implementation prior to the study. Data were collected through observations, memos, emails, and four focus group interviews with 10 participants including employees, managers, and occupational safety and health consultants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Workplace 1 (WP1) implemented the toolbox, employing seven strategies: identifying and preparing champions, conducting a local needs assessment, distributing educational materials, reminding clinicians, tailoring strategies, organising implementation team meetings, and creating learning collaboratives. Key enablers included management engagement, ongoing exposure, and creating a safe environment, whereas lack of time was identified as a barrier. At workplace 2 (WP2), three strategies were employed: identifying and preparing champions, distributing educational materials, and conducting educational meetings. However, the toolbox was never fully implemented, hindered by time-related barriers, organisational restructuring, and unclear roles and responsibilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Effective implementation of workplace MSD interventions requires management engagement, time allocation, and clear roles.</p>","PeriodicalId":48035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-026-10413-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are a leading cause of sickness absence from work and early retirement. While structured workplace dialogues about musculoskeletal pain are recommended, their implementation remains challenging. This study explored the implementation of the 'Talk About Pain-Take Action Together'' toolbox in two Danish public workplaces.

Methods: Qualitative observational implementation study informed by reflexive thematic analysis was conducted. Two workplaces with physically demanding roles were included: one with researcher-initiated implementation during the study period and one with internally initiated implementation prior to the study. Data were collected through observations, memos, emails, and four focus group interviews with 10 participants including employees, managers, and occupational safety and health consultants.

Results: Workplace 1 (WP1) implemented the toolbox, employing seven strategies: identifying and preparing champions, conducting a local needs assessment, distributing educational materials, reminding clinicians, tailoring strategies, organising implementation team meetings, and creating learning collaboratives. Key enablers included management engagement, ongoing exposure, and creating a safe environment, whereas lack of time was identified as a barrier. At workplace 2 (WP2), three strategies were employed: identifying and preparing champions, distributing educational materials, and conducting educational meetings. However, the toolbox was never fully implemented, hindered by time-related barriers, organisational restructuring, and unclear roles and responsibilities.

Conclusions: Effective implementation of workplace MSD interventions requires management engagement, time allocation, and clear roles.

实施“谈论疼痛-共同行动”工具箱以改善工作场所肌肉骨骼疼痛管理。
目的:肌肉骨骼疾病(MSDs)是疾病缺勤和提前退休的主要原因。虽然建议在工作场所进行有关肌肉骨骼疼痛的结构化对话,但实施起来仍然具有挑战性。本研究探讨了在两个丹麦公共工作场所实施“谈论痛苦-共同采取行动”工具箱。方法:采用反身性专题分析方法进行定性观察实施研究。包括两个对体力要求较高的工作场所:一个在研究期间由研究人员发起实施,另一个在研究之前由内部发起实施。通过观察、备忘录、电子邮件和四次焦点小组访谈收集数据,访谈对象包括10名参与者,包括员工、经理和职业安全与健康顾问。结果:工作场所1 (WP1)实施了工具箱,采用了七种策略:确定和准备冠军,进行当地需求评估,分发教育材料,提醒临床医生,调整策略,组织实施团队会议,创建学习协作。关键的推动因素包括管理参与、持续暴露和创建安全的环境,而缺乏时间被认为是一个障碍。在工作场所2 (WP2),采用了三种策略:确定和准备冠军,分发教育材料,以及召开教育会议。然而,由于时间障碍、组织结构调整以及角色和职责不明确,该工具箱从未完全实现。结论:工作场所MSD干预措施的有效实施需要管理层的参与、时间分配和明确的角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation is an international forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers on the rehabilitation, reintegration, and prevention of disability in workers. The journal offers investigations involving original data collection and research synthesis (i.e., scoping reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses). Papers derive from a broad array of fields including rehabilitation medicine, physical and occupational therapy, health psychology and psychiatry, orthopedics, oncology, occupational and insurance medicine, neurology, social work, ergonomics, biomedical engineering, health economics, rehabilitation engineering, business administration and management, and law.  A single interdisciplinary source for information on work disability rehabilitation, the Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation helps to advance the scientific understanding, management, and prevention of work disability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书