Evaluation of human leukocyte antigen histocompatibility and its impact on liver transplant graft outcomes.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2026-05-15 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562848261447157
Dorothy Liu, Kate Collins, Marcos V Perini, Graham Starkey, Michael Fink, Robert Jones, Adam Testro, Marie Sinclair, Avik Majumdar
{"title":"Evaluation of human leukocyte antigen histocompatibility and its impact on liver transplant graft outcomes.","authors":"Dorothy Liu, Kate Collins, Marcos V Perini, Graham Starkey, Michael Fink, Robert Jones, Adam Testro, Marie Sinclair, Avik Majumdar","doi":"10.1177/17562848261447157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) histocompatibility on graft survival is well established in kidney and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation; however, its role in liver transplantation (LT) remains uncertain. Prior studies have reported inconsistent associations between HLA mismatching and LT graft outcomes. Given emerging evidence linking HLA mismatch to post-transplant complications, this relationship warrants reassessment.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the effect of HLA Class I (A, B, C) and Class II (DRB1, DQA, DQB) mismatching on LT graft survival in a single-centre retrospective analysis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective, single-centre cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>610 patients who underwent their first deceased donor LT between January 2010 and March 2021 were included. The primary outcome was graft failure. Donor and recipient HLA typing was available at HLA-A, HLA-B and HLA-DRB1 loci in 610 patients, HLA-C in 38 patients, HLA-DQA in 63 patients and HLA-DQB in 63 patients. Graft survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and predictors identified using Cox regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HLA-C mismatching was associated with reduced graft survival on Kaplan-Meier analysis (<i>p</i> = 0.02); however, this was based on a small subgroup (<i>n</i> = 38), and the univariate Cox estimate was imprecise (HR 9.24, 95% CI 1.01-83.48, <i>p</i> = 0.047). HLA-DRB1 mismatching was associated with improved graft survival (<i>p</i> = 0.047) and reduced graft failure risk on multivariate Cox regression (aHR 0.34, 95% CI 0.14-0.87, <i>p</i> = 0.02), although limited by the small number of matched transplants (<i>n</i> = 9). There was no association between mismatches at other loci and graft survival. Hepatic artery thrombosis worsened graft survival (aHR 3.42, 95% CI 2.44-4.80, <i>p</i> < 0.001) but was not associated with HLA mismatch.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results suggest that the effect of HLA histocompatibility in LT may be locus-specific. Associations were observed for differential graft outcomes at the HLA-C and HLA-DRB1 loci; however, given the small sample sizes and imprecision of estimates, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating and require validation in larger prospective cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":48770,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","volume":"19 ","pages":"17562848261447157"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13180152/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848261447157","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The impact of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) histocompatibility on graft survival is well established in kidney and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation; however, its role in liver transplantation (LT) remains uncertain. Prior studies have reported inconsistent associations between HLA mismatching and LT graft outcomes. Given emerging evidence linking HLA mismatch to post-transplant complications, this relationship warrants reassessment.

Objectives: To investigate the effect of HLA Class I (A, B, C) and Class II (DRB1, DQA, DQB) mismatching on LT graft survival in a single-centre retrospective analysis.

Design: A retrospective, single-centre cohort study.

Methods: 610 patients who underwent their first deceased donor LT between January 2010 and March 2021 were included. The primary outcome was graft failure. Donor and recipient HLA typing was available at HLA-A, HLA-B and HLA-DRB1 loci in 610 patients, HLA-C in 38 patients, HLA-DQA in 63 patients and HLA-DQB in 63 patients. Graft survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and predictors identified using Cox regression.

Results: HLA-C mismatching was associated with reduced graft survival on Kaplan-Meier analysis (p = 0.02); however, this was based on a small subgroup (n = 38), and the univariate Cox estimate was imprecise (HR 9.24, 95% CI 1.01-83.48, p = 0.047). HLA-DRB1 mismatching was associated with improved graft survival (p = 0.047) and reduced graft failure risk on multivariate Cox regression (aHR 0.34, 95% CI 0.14-0.87, p = 0.02), although limited by the small number of matched transplants (n = 9). There was no association between mismatches at other loci and graft survival. Hepatic artery thrombosis worsened graft survival (aHR 3.42, 95% CI 2.44-4.80, p < 0.001) but was not associated with HLA mismatch.

Conclusion: These results suggest that the effect of HLA histocompatibility in LT may be locus-specific. Associations were observed for differential graft outcomes at the HLA-C and HLA-DRB1 loci; however, given the small sample sizes and imprecision of estimates, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating and require validation in larger prospective cohorts.

人白细胞抗原组织相容性的评价及其对肝移植结果的影响。
背景:人白细胞抗原(HLA)组织相容性对肾和造血干细胞移植中移植物存活的影响已经得到了很好的证实;然而,其在肝移植(LT)中的作用仍不确定。先前的研究报告了HLA错配与左室移植结果之间不一致的关联。鉴于新的证据将HLA错配与移植后并发症联系起来,这种关系值得重新评估。目的:通过单中心回顾性分析,探讨HLA I类(A、B、C)和II类(DRB1、DQA、DQB)错配对肝移植存活的影响。设计:回顾性单中心队列研究。方法:610例在2010年1月至2021年3月期间接受了首次死亡供体肝移植的患者。主要结局是移植物衰竭。610例患者的HLA- a、HLA- b和HLA- drb1位点、38例患者的HLA- c位点、63例患者的HLA- dqa位点和63例患者的HLA- dqb位点均可获得供体和受体HLA分型。采用Kaplan-Meier分析评估移植物存活,采用Cox回归确定预测因子。结果:Kaplan-Meier分析显示,HLA-C错配与移植物存活率降低相关(p = 0.02);然而,这是基于一个小亚组(n = 38),单因素Cox估计不精确(HR 9.24, 95% CI 1.01-83.48, p = 0.047)。多变量Cox回归显示,HLA-DRB1错配与移植物存活率提高(p = 0.047)和移植物衰竭风险降低相关(aHR 0.34, 95% CI 0.14-0.87, p = 0.02),尽管受匹配移植数量较少(n = 9)的限制。其他位点的不匹配与移植物存活没有关联。肝动脉血栓形成使移植物存活恶化(aHR 3.42, 95% CI 2.44-4.80, p)。结论:HLA组织相容性在肝移植中的作用可能是位点特异性的。在HLA-C和HLA-DRB1位点观察到不同移植物结果的关联;然而,由于样本量小,估计不精确,这些发现应该被认为是假设产生的,需要在更大的前瞻性队列中验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.40%
发文量
103
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology is an open access journal which delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed original research articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of gastrointestinal and hepatic disorders. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at an international audience of clinicians and researchers in gastroenterology and related disciplines, providing an online forum for rapid dissemination of recent research and perspectives in this area. The editors welcome original research articles across all areas of gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal publishes original research articles and review articles primarily. Original research manuscripts may include laboratory, animal or human/clinical studies – all phases. Letters to the Editor and Case Reports will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书