Treatment of refractory idiopathic overactive bladder with incobotulinumtoxinA and vibe delivery system (XAVIER): pilot study.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Omri Schwarztuch Gildor, Avner Geva, Avi Eftel, Frederico Branco, Luis Xambre, Roger R Dmochowski, Michael Vainrib
{"title":"Treatment of refractory idiopathic overactive bladder with incobotulinumtoxinA and vibe delivery system (XAVIER): pilot study.","authors":"Omri Schwarztuch Gildor, Avner Geva, Avi Eftel, Frederico Branco, Luis Xambre, Roger R Dmochowski, Michael Vainrib","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.26.06822-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intradetrusor botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT/A) with onabotulinumtoxinA (onabotA), is an established treatment for overactive bladder (OAB). This study aims to evaluate the safety, usability, and initial efficacy of ViXe - a combination of incobotulinumtoxinA with the needle-free, ultrasound-assisted intravesical Vibe delivery system - in women with OAB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Parallel, exploratory, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo- and sham-controlled. Women (18-80 years) with idiopathic OAB were randomized 1:1 to ViXe or placebo. Primary endpoints: 12-week safety and patient satisfaction. Secondary endpoints: initial efficacy measured by bladder diaries and validated questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-two screened, 48 were randomized (ViXe 25; placebo 23); 47 completed. Safety: Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 44.0% ViXe vs. 39.1% placebo patients; fewer events were reported in the ViXe group (13 vs. 17); all mild-moderate; no serious events. Treatment-related adverse events were fewer with ViXe (8.0%) than with placebo (21.7%). Patient experience favored ViXe on several comfort domains; willingness to continue was higher (73.7% vs. 28.6%). Urinary incontinence decreased by 58% compared to 35% at week 6 and 59% compared to 45% at week 12 (ViXe vs. placebo); Overactive bladder questionnaires showed improvement in both groups, but it was not statistically significant. Satisfaction favored ViXe, with 63.16% patients satisfied, versus 57.14% dissatisfied in the placebo group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ViXe is safe and well-tolerated, with only mild to moderate AEs. The needle-free, office-amenable workflow and handling advantages of incobotulinumtoxinA support feasibility and patient acceptability. These data collectively justify a larger, adequately powered Phase 2b/3 trial to determine clinical efficacy and assess durability.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.26.06822-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intradetrusor botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT/A) with onabotulinumtoxinA (onabotA), is an established treatment for overactive bladder (OAB). This study aims to evaluate the safety, usability, and initial efficacy of ViXe - a combination of incobotulinumtoxinA with the needle-free, ultrasound-assisted intravesical Vibe delivery system - in women with OAB.

Methods: Parallel, exploratory, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo- and sham-controlled. Women (18-80 years) with idiopathic OAB were randomized 1:1 to ViXe or placebo. Primary endpoints: 12-week safety and patient satisfaction. Secondary endpoints: initial efficacy measured by bladder diaries and validated questionnaires.

Results: Eighty-two screened, 48 were randomized (ViXe 25; placebo 23); 47 completed. Safety: Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 44.0% ViXe vs. 39.1% placebo patients; fewer events were reported in the ViXe group (13 vs. 17); all mild-moderate; no serious events. Treatment-related adverse events were fewer with ViXe (8.0%) than with placebo (21.7%). Patient experience favored ViXe on several comfort domains; willingness to continue was higher (73.7% vs. 28.6%). Urinary incontinence decreased by 58% compared to 35% at week 6 and 59% compared to 45% at week 12 (ViXe vs. placebo); Overactive bladder questionnaires showed improvement in both groups, but it was not statistically significant. Satisfaction favored ViXe, with 63.16% patients satisfied, versus 57.14% dissatisfied in the placebo group.

Conclusions: ViXe is safe and well-tolerated, with only mild to moderate AEs. The needle-free, office-amenable workflow and handling advantages of incobotulinumtoxinA support feasibility and patient acceptability. These data collectively justify a larger, adequately powered Phase 2b/3 trial to determine clinical efficacy and assess durability.

incoboulinumtoxin和vibe给药系统(XAVIER)治疗难治性特发性膀胱过动症:初步研究。
背景:肌内肉毒杆菌神经毒素A型(BoNT/A)联合肉毒杆菌毒素A (onabotA)是治疗膀胱过动症(OAB)的有效方法。本研究旨在评估ViXe在OAB女性中的安全性、可用性和初步疗效。ViXe是一种将肉毒杆菌毒素与无针、超声辅助的膀胱内Vibe给药系统相结合的方法。方法:平行、探索性、多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂和假对照。患有特发性OAB的女性(18-80岁)以1:1的比例随机分配到ViXe或安慰剂组。主要终点:12周的安全性和患者满意度。次要终点:通过膀胱日记和有效问卷测量初始疗效。结果:筛选82例,随机48例(ViXe 25例,安慰剂23例);47完成。安全性:治疗引起的不良事件发生率为44.0%,安慰剂组为39.1%;ViXe组报告的事件较少(13例对17例);轻中度;没有严重事件。ViXe组治疗相关不良事件(8.0%)少于安慰剂组(21.7%)。患者体验在几个舒适领域上支持ViXe;继续的意愿更高(73.7% vs. 28.6%)。尿失禁减少58%,而第6周为35%;第12周为59%,而第12周为45% (ViXe vs安慰剂);膀胱过度活动问卷显示两组患者均有所改善,但无统计学意义。满意度倾向于ViXe, 63.16%的患者满意,而安慰剂组有57.14%的患者不满意。结论:ViXe安全且耐受性良好,仅发生轻度至中度不良反应。incoboulinumtoxa的无针、办公室工作流程和处理优势支持可行性和患者可接受性。这些数据共同证明了一个更大的,充分支持的2b/3期试验,以确定临床疗效和评估耐久性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva Urology and Nephrology
Minerva Urology and Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
32.70%
发文量
237
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书