Admission biomarkers and COVID-19 mortality: A retrospective study during Vietnam's pandemic peak.

IF 1.2 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Journal of Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2026-04-30 eCollection Date: 2026-04-01 DOI:10.62838/jccm-2026-0003
Uyen Thi Bich Nguyen, Hau Phuc Le, Vu Hoang Anh Nguyen, Ai-Thanh Tran-Nguyen
{"title":"Admission biomarkers and COVID-19 mortality: A retrospective study during Vietnam's pandemic peak.","authors":"Uyen Thi Bich Nguyen, Hau Phuc Le, Vu Hoang Anh Nguyen, Ai-Thanh Tran-Nguyen","doi":"10.62838/jccm-2026-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of key admission biomarkers in predicting mortality among hospitalized COVID-19 patients and to establish optimal cut-off thresholds for clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study included 269 COVID-19 patients treated at Thu Duc City Hospital, Vietnam, during the peak of the fourth pandemic wave in 2021. Logistic regression identified independent predictors of mortality, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis assessed the diagnostic performance of biomarkers. The area under the ROC curve (AUROC), Sensitivity, Specificity and Accuracy Index were used to determine optimal cut-off values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 269 patients, 53 (19.7%) died and 216 (80.3%) survived. Non-survivors exhibited elevated D-dimer (4.48 μg/mL vs 0.93 μg/mL, p < 0.0001), neutrophil counts (6.8 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L vs 3.5 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L, p < 0.0001) and white blood cell counts (11.68 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L vs. 7.87 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L, p < 0.0001). Lymphocyte counts and fibrinogen levels were significantly lower in non-survivors (p < 0.05). Logistic regression identified D-dimer (OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.02-1.09, p = 0.001), neutrophil counts (OR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.10-1.63, p = 0.005) and lymphocyte counts (OR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.26-0.92, p = 0.033) as significant predictors of mortality. ROC analysis revealed that D-dimer (AUROC = 0.809) and neutrophil counts (AUROC = 0.726) demonstrated strong discriminatory power, with cut-off values of ≥1.126 μg/mL (sensitivity = 90.57%, specificity = 60.19%) and ≥6.715 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L (sensitivity = 52.83%, specificity = 82.87%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings support the use of admission biomarkers to guide early interventions and improve patient outcomes in severe COVID-19 cases. Further studies are warranted to validate these results and explore their applicability in other settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":44227,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Critical Care Medicine","volume":"12 2","pages":"158-166"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13180407/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62838/jccm-2026-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of key admission biomarkers in predicting mortality among hospitalized COVID-19 patients and to establish optimal cut-off thresholds for clinical decision-making.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study included 269 COVID-19 patients treated at Thu Duc City Hospital, Vietnam, during the peak of the fourth pandemic wave in 2021. Logistic regression identified independent predictors of mortality, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis assessed the diagnostic performance of biomarkers. The area under the ROC curve (AUROC), Sensitivity, Specificity and Accuracy Index were used to determine optimal cut-off values.

Results: Among the 269 patients, 53 (19.7%) died and 216 (80.3%) survived. Non-survivors exhibited elevated D-dimer (4.48 μg/mL vs 0.93 μg/mL, p < 0.0001), neutrophil counts (6.8 × 109/L vs 3.5 × 109/L, p < 0.0001) and white blood cell counts (11.68 × 109/L vs. 7.87 × 109/L, p < 0.0001). Lymphocyte counts and fibrinogen levels were significantly lower in non-survivors (p < 0.05). Logistic regression identified D-dimer (OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.02-1.09, p = 0.001), neutrophil counts (OR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.10-1.63, p = 0.005) and lymphocyte counts (OR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.26-0.92, p = 0.033) as significant predictors of mortality. ROC analysis revealed that D-dimer (AUROC = 0.809) and neutrophil counts (AUROC = 0.726) demonstrated strong discriminatory power, with cut-off values of ≥1.126 μg/mL (sensitivity = 90.57%, specificity = 60.19%) and ≥6.715 × 109/L (sensitivity = 52.83%, specificity = 82.87%), respectively.

Conclusion: These findings support the use of admission biomarkers to guide early interventions and improve patient outcomes in severe COVID-19 cases. Further studies are warranted to validate these results and explore their applicability in other settings.

入院生物标志物和COVID-19死亡率:越南大流行高峰期间的回顾性研究
背景:本研究旨在评估关键入院生物标志物在预测COVID-19住院患者死亡率中的预后价值,并为临床决策建立最佳截止阈值。方法:回顾性队列研究纳入了2021年第四次大流行高峰期间在越南Thu Duc市医院治疗的269例COVID-19患者。Logistic回归确定了死亡率的独立预测因子,受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析评估了生物标志物的诊断性能。采用ROC曲线下面积(AUROC)、灵敏度(Sensitivity)、特异性(Specificity)和准确度指数(Accuracy Index)确定最佳临界值。结果:269例患者中,死亡53例(19.7%),存活216例(80.3%)。非幸存者表现出d -二聚体升高(4.48 μg/mL vs 0.93 μg/mL, p < 0.0001),中性粒细胞计数(6.8 × 109/L vs 3.5 × 109/L, p < 0.0001)和白细胞计数(11.68 × 109/L vs 7.87 × 109/L, p < 0.0001)。未存活患者淋巴细胞计数和纤维蛋白原水平显著降低(p < 0.05)。Logistic回归发现d -二聚体(OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.02-1.09, p = 0.001)、中性粒细胞计数(OR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.10-1.63, p = 0.005)和淋巴细胞计数(OR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.26-0.92, p = 0.033)是死亡率的重要预测因子。ROC分析显示,d -二聚体(AUROC = 0.809)和中性粒细胞计数(AUROC = 0.726)具有很强的区分力,临界值分别为≥1.126 μg/mL(灵敏度= 90.57%,特异性= 60.19%)和≥6.715 × 109/L(灵敏度= 52.83%,特异性= 82.87%)。结论:这些发现支持使用入院生物标志物指导COVID-19重症病例的早期干预和改善患者预后。需要进一步的研究来验证这些结果,并探索其在其他环境中的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Critical Care Medicine
Journal of Critical Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
21
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书