Knowledge Traffic in Learning Health Systems: A Conceptual Framework for Organizational Phenotyping and Translational Governance

IF 2.3 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Octavian C. Ioachimescu
{"title":"Knowledge Traffic in Learning Health Systems: A Conceptual Framework for Organizational Phenotyping and Translational Governance","authors":"Octavian C. Ioachimescu","doi":"10.1002/lrh2.70095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The translational journey from biomedical discovery to population health is increasingly complex, requiring coordinated navigation across scientific, clinical, and operational domains. While the Learning Health System (LHS) is a unifying platform developed to accelerate knowledge cycles, evidence generation, testing, and application, its role in governing translational flows across different organization types remains insufficiently specified.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This perspective article proposes a conceptual, structured approach and taxonomy that links translational spectrum (<i>T</i><sub>0</sub>–<i>T</i><sub>5</sub>) to the health system phenotype and identifies the LHS as the governance and operational layer that enables safe, efficient, and speed-appropriate translation from <i>T</i><sub>4</sub> to <i>T</i><sub>5</sub>, where competing translational pathways converge. The proposed phenotyping schema is aimed at optimizing LHS configuration and translational performance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We synthesize prior work on translational science, LHS design, and organizational capability into an analytic typology (LHS<sub>1</sub>–LHS<sub>4</sub>) based on innovation generation and adoption, and their specific investigative capabilities. This new organizational typology shifts the LHS concept from a descriptive model to an actionable design and governance tool, enabling organizational leaders to align infrastructure, strategy, and translational intent.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Health systems differ in how they generate, test, and adopt new knowledge, yet all require explicit governance, prioritization, data infrastructure, stakeholder engagement, and improvement capacity to move evidence into routine care and population impact. The LHS<sub>1</sub>–LHS<sub>4</sub> are presented as descriptive phenotypes with distinct capability profiles and operationalizations, highlighting the central role of LHS governance in aligning priorities, resources, and implementation pathways.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>By explicitly linking system phenotype to translational function, leaders can build a robust foundation for operational decision-making and targeted investments, while clarifying the rights, rules, and permissions needed for safe knowledge movement, and offering a basis for evaluation, implementation, and further empirical testing.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":43916,"journal":{"name":"Learning Health Systems","volume":"10 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13180781/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lrh2.70095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The translational journey from biomedical discovery to population health is increasingly complex, requiring coordinated navigation across scientific, clinical, and operational domains. While the Learning Health System (LHS) is a unifying platform developed to accelerate knowledge cycles, evidence generation, testing, and application, its role in governing translational flows across different organization types remains insufficiently specified.

Objective

This perspective article proposes a conceptual, structured approach and taxonomy that links translational spectrum (T0–T5) to the health system phenotype and identifies the LHS as the governance and operational layer that enables safe, efficient, and speed-appropriate translation from T4 to T5, where competing translational pathways converge. The proposed phenotyping schema is aimed at optimizing LHS configuration and translational performance.

Methods

We synthesize prior work on translational science, LHS design, and organizational capability into an analytic typology (LHS1–LHS4) based on innovation generation and adoption, and their specific investigative capabilities. This new organizational typology shifts the LHS concept from a descriptive model to an actionable design and governance tool, enabling organizational leaders to align infrastructure, strategy, and translational intent.

Results

Health systems differ in how they generate, test, and adopt new knowledge, yet all require explicit governance, prioritization, data infrastructure, stakeholder engagement, and improvement capacity to move evidence into routine care and population impact. The LHS1–LHS4 are presented as descriptive phenotypes with distinct capability profiles and operationalizations, highlighting the central role of LHS governance in aligning priorities, resources, and implementation pathways.

Conclusions

By explicitly linking system phenotype to translational function, leaders can build a robust foundation for operational decision-making and targeted investments, while clarifying the rights, rules, and permissions needed for safe knowledge movement, and offering a basis for evaluation, implementation, and further empirical testing.

Abstract Image

学习卫生系统中的知识流量:组织表型和转化治理的概念框架。
背景:从生物医学发现到人口健康的转化过程越来越复杂,需要在科学、临床和操作领域之间进行协调导航。虽然学习健康系统(LHS)是一个统一的平台,旨在加速知识循环、证据生成、测试和应用,但它在管理跨不同组织类型的转化流方面的作用仍然不够明确。目的:这篇前瞻性文章提出了一种概念性的、结构化的方法和分类法,将翻译谱(t0 - t5)与卫生系统表型联系起来,并将LHS确定为治理和操作层,使从t4到t5的安全、高效和适当的翻译成为可能,在这里,相互竞争的翻译途径汇聚在一起。所提出的表型模式旨在优化LHS结构和翻译性能。方法:综合前人在转化科学、LHS设计和组织能力方面的研究成果,基于创新的产生和采用及其具体的研究能力,将其归纳为一个分析类型学(LHS1-LHS4)。这种新的组织类型将LHS概念从描述性模型转变为可操作的设计和治理工具,使组织领导者能够协调基础设施、战略和转化意图。结果:卫生系统在如何产生、测试和采用新知识方面存在差异,但都需要明确的治理、优先次序、数据基础设施、利益相关者参与以及提高将证据转化为常规护理和人口影响的能力。LHS1-LHS4以具有不同能力概况和操作方式的描述性表型呈现,突出了LHS治理在调整优先级、资源和实现途径方面的核心作用。结论:通过明确地将系统表型与转化功能联系起来,领导者可以为运营决策和有针对性的投资建立坚实的基础,同时澄清安全知识流动所需的权利、规则和许可,并为评估、实施和进一步的实证测试提供基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Learning Health Systems
Learning Health Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
22.60%
发文量
55
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书