A Mixed-methods Evaluation of Attitudes and Perceptions of Multispecialty Learners Undertaking a Hybrid Research Methodology Course in Low-resourced Settings.

Q4 Medicine
Annals of African Surgery Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-11
Surafel Dubale, Marie Martin, Rondi Kauffmann, Jana Macleod, Elizabeth Rose
{"title":"A Mixed-methods Evaluation of Attitudes and Perceptions of Multispecialty Learners Undertaking a Hybrid Research Methodology Course in Low-resourced Settings.","authors":"Surafel Dubale, Marie Martin, Rondi Kauffmann, Jana Macleod, Elizabeth Rose","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Addressing the surgical burden of disease in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) requires an increased number of medical researchers who understand local systems and resources. Advanced research training in medical programs in LMICs has been limited. To address this need, a hybrid, flipped-classroom research methods course was developed in a nurse anesthetist training program and expanded to surgery and anesthesiology training programs and an anesthesiology faculty development program in two countries. We assessed the effectiveness of the research methods course in strengthening research skills across anesthesiology and surgery specialties by evaluating participants' attitudes and perceptions of the course.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using an online course survey, we collected qualitative and quantitative data on trainees' perceptions of the course and their self-reported confidence to perform research competencies taught in the course. Quantitative data were analyzed through calculating descriptive statistics, and qualitative findings were reviewed through thematic coding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents were distributed across the three training programs as follows: surgical residency (n=17), registered nurse anesthetist (n=16), and anesthesiologist faculty development (n=3). Most (94%) agreed that they will use knowledge from this course. Using a scale of 1-5 with 5 corresponding to very confident, the respondents reported being confident in their abilities to engage in all phases of research consistent with the course competencies, with means ranging from 3.83 to 4.11. They were most confident in performing a scientific literature review and identifying a research topic.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This course helped strengthen trainees' confidence in the seven phases of conducting and disseminating research. The course helped trainees from different specialties and training programs build skills in research methods. This novel, hybrid, flipped-classroom research methods course was effective in building self-confidence for healthcare professionals across the practice continuum to tackle, develop, and perform research.</p>","PeriodicalId":37442,"journal":{"name":"Annals of African Surgery","volume":"22 4","pages":"132-138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13181616/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of African Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Addressing the surgical burden of disease in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) requires an increased number of medical researchers who understand local systems and resources. Advanced research training in medical programs in LMICs has been limited. To address this need, a hybrid, flipped-classroom research methods course was developed in a nurse anesthetist training program and expanded to surgery and anesthesiology training programs and an anesthesiology faculty development program in two countries. We assessed the effectiveness of the research methods course in strengthening research skills across anesthesiology and surgery specialties by evaluating participants' attitudes and perceptions of the course.

Methods: Using an online course survey, we collected qualitative and quantitative data on trainees' perceptions of the course and their self-reported confidence to perform research competencies taught in the course. Quantitative data were analyzed through calculating descriptive statistics, and qualitative findings were reviewed through thematic coding.

Results: Respondents were distributed across the three training programs as follows: surgical residency (n=17), registered nurse anesthetist (n=16), and anesthesiologist faculty development (n=3). Most (94%) agreed that they will use knowledge from this course. Using a scale of 1-5 with 5 corresponding to very confident, the respondents reported being confident in their abilities to engage in all phases of research consistent with the course competencies, with means ranging from 3.83 to 4.11. They were most confident in performing a scientific literature review and identifying a research topic.

Conclusion: This course helped strengthen trainees' confidence in the seven phases of conducting and disseminating research. The course helped trainees from different specialties and training programs build skills in research methods. This novel, hybrid, flipped-classroom research methods course was effective in building self-confidence for healthcare professionals across the practice continuum to tackle, develop, and perform research.

在资源匮乏的环境下,多专业学习者参加混合研究方法论课程的态度和看法的混合方法评估。
背景:解决低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的手术疾病负担需要更多了解当地系统和资源的医学研究人员。中低收入国家医学项目的高级研究培训有限。为了满足这一需求,在一个护士麻醉师培训项目中开发了一个混合的、翻转课堂的研究方法课程,并在两个国家扩展到外科和麻醉学培训项目以及麻醉学教师发展项目。我们通过评估参与者对课程的态度和看法来评估研究方法课程在加强麻醉学和外科专业研究技能方面的有效性。方法:通过在线课程调查,我们收集了学员对课程的看法以及他们对课程中教授的研究能力的自我报告信心的定性和定量数据。定量数据通过计算描述性统计进行分析,定性结果通过专题编码进行审查。结果:受访者分布在以下三个培训项目中:外科住院医师(n=17),注册麻醉师护士(n=16)和麻醉师教师发展(n=3)。大多数人(94%)同意他们会使用这门课程的知识。使用1-5分,其中5分表示非常自信,受访者表示对自己参与与课程能力一致的所有研究阶段的能力充满信心,平均值从3.83到4.11。他们在进行科学文献综述和确定研究主题方面最有信心。结论:本课程有助于增强学员对开展和传播研究的七个阶段的信心。该课程帮助来自不同专业和培训项目的学员建立研究方法的技能。这种新颖的、混合的、翻转课堂的研究方法课程有效地建立了医疗保健专业人员在实践连续体中处理、发展和执行研究的自信。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of African Surgery
Annals of African Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of African Surgery ANN. AFR. SURG. (ISSN: 1999-9674 [print], ISSN: 2523-0816 [online]) is a bi-annual publication that aims to provide a medium for the exchange of current information between surgeons in the African region. The journal embraces surgery in all its aspects: basic science, clinical research, experimental research, and surgical education. The Annals of African Surgery will help surgeons in the region keep abreast of developing surgical innovations. This Ethics Policies document is intended to inform the public and all persons affiliated with The Annals of African Surgery of its general ethics policies. Types of articles published: -Original articles -Case reports -Case series -Reviews -Short communications -Letters to the editor -Commentaries Annals of African Surgery publishes manuscripts in the following fields: - Cardiac and thoracic surgery - General surgery - Neurosurgery - Oral and maxillofacial surgery - Trauma and orthopaedic surgery - Otolaryngology (ear, nose and throat surgery) - Paediatric surgery - Plastic and reconstructive surgery - Urology surgery - Gynaecologic surgery - Surgical education -Medical education -Global surgery - Health advocacy - Innovations in surgery - Basic sciences - Anatomical sciences - Genetic and molecular studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书