Intracranial efficacy of combined immune checkpoint inhibitors and platinum plus etoposide therapy in patients with extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer and brain metastases
{"title":"Intracranial efficacy of combined immune checkpoint inhibitors and platinum plus etoposide therapy in patients with extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer and brain metastases","authors":"Kenta Nakamura , Toshihiro Shiozawa , Hiroaki Tachi , Jun Kanazawa , Takeshi Numata , Tomohiro Tamura , Shigen Hayashi , Tomoyuki Ogata , Kunihiko Miyazaki , Norihiro Kikuchi , Koichi Kurishima , Hiroaki Satoh , Nobuyuki Hizawa","doi":"10.1016/j.ctarc.2026.101249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The management of brain metastases remains a major challenge in extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC). Although immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy combined with etoposide and platinum (EP) is the standard treatment for ED-SCLC, its intracranial efficacy remains unclear. This study evaluated the efficacy of combined ICI and EP therapy, with a focus on intracranial response.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively included 59 patients with ED-SCLC and brain metastases who received combined ICI and EP therapy. Efficacy endpoints included objective response rates (ORRs), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The ORR and PFS were evaluated separately for intracranial (i) and extracranial (e) lesions. We also evaluated survival according to upfront brain radiotherapy (BRT) use prior to systemic chemotherapy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients with a performance status of 2 or 3 accounted for 27 % of the cohort. Nineteen patients (32 %) had symptomatic brain metastases. The iORR and eORR were 73 % and 78 %, respectively (<em>p</em> = 0.42). The median iPFS was 6.3 months (95 % confidence intervals [CI]: 4.5–8.0), comparable to the median ePFS of 5.2 months (95 % CI: 4.0–6.4). In survival analyses by upfront BRT, the median iPFS was numerically longer in the BRT group than in the non-BRT group (9.7 vs. 5.7 months, <em>p</em> = 0.09). The median OS did not differ significantly between the BRT and non-BRT groups (11.6 months vs. 10.9 months; <em>p</em> = 0.26).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Combined ICI and EP therapy demonstrated favorable intracranial efficacy. OS was similar regardless of upfront BRT, supporting this regimen as a valuable treatment option for ED-SCLC with brain metastases.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9507,"journal":{"name":"Cancer treatment and research communications","volume":"48 ","pages":"Article 101249"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer treatment and research communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468294226001607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The management of brain metastases remains a major challenge in extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC). Although immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy combined with etoposide and platinum (EP) is the standard treatment for ED-SCLC, its intracranial efficacy remains unclear. This study evaluated the efficacy of combined ICI and EP therapy, with a focus on intracranial response.
Methods
We retrospectively included 59 patients with ED-SCLC and brain metastases who received combined ICI and EP therapy. Efficacy endpoints included objective response rates (ORRs), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The ORR and PFS were evaluated separately for intracranial (i) and extracranial (e) lesions. We also evaluated survival according to upfront brain radiotherapy (BRT) use prior to systemic chemotherapy.
Results
Patients with a performance status of 2 or 3 accounted for 27 % of the cohort. Nineteen patients (32 %) had symptomatic brain metastases. The iORR and eORR were 73 % and 78 %, respectively (p = 0.42). The median iPFS was 6.3 months (95 % confidence intervals [CI]: 4.5–8.0), comparable to the median ePFS of 5.2 months (95 % CI: 4.0–6.4). In survival analyses by upfront BRT, the median iPFS was numerically longer in the BRT group than in the non-BRT group (9.7 vs. 5.7 months, p = 0.09). The median OS did not differ significantly between the BRT and non-BRT groups (11.6 months vs. 10.9 months; p = 0.26).
Conclusion
Combined ICI and EP therapy demonstrated favorable intracranial efficacy. OS was similar regardless of upfront BRT, supporting this regimen as a valuable treatment option for ED-SCLC with brain metastases.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Treatment and Research Communications is an international peer-reviewed publication dedicated to providing comprehensive basic, translational, and clinical oncology research. The journal is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, policy, and treatment of cancer and provides a global forum for the nurturing and development of future generations of oncology scientists. Cancer Treatment and Research Communications publishes comprehensive reviews and original studies describing various aspects of basic through clinical research of all tumor types. The journal also accepts clinical studies in oncology, with an emphasis on prospective early phase clinical trials. Specific areas of interest include basic, translational, and clinical research and mechanistic approaches; cancer biology; molecular carcinogenesis; genetics and genomics; stem cell and developmental biology; immunology; molecular and cellular oncology; systems biology; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; cancer policy; and integration of various approaches. Our mission is to be the premier source of relevant information through promoting excellence in research and facilitating the timely translation of that science to health care and clinical practice.