Analysis of the Efficacy of Arthroscopic Suture Anchor "X" Fixation for Lateral Femoral Condyle Osteochondral Fractures.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Yan ChengShang, ShiJuan Li, Min Cai, ChuanKai Zhang, GuangWang Liu, Song Zhou, ZeWen Zheng
{"title":"Analysis of the Efficacy of Arthroscopic Suture Anchor \"X\" Fixation for Lateral Femoral Condyle Osteochondral Fractures.","authors":"Yan ChengShang, ShiJuan Li, Min Cai, ChuanKai Zhang, GuangWang Liu, Song Zhou, ZeWen Zheng","doi":"10.55095/achot2025/046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of the study: </strong>To evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy of arthroscopic suture anchor \"X\" fixation and hollow compression screw fixation in treating lateral femoral condyle osteochondral fractures.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed 31 patients diagnosed with lateral femoral condyle osteochondral fractures, treated at our hospital between June 2015 and July 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical approach: Group A received arthroscopic suture anchor \"X\" fixation, while Group B underwent arthroscopic hollow compression screw fixation combined with a spacer. HSS scores and excellent outcome rates were assessed at postoperative day 3, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. Additionally, postoperative complications were evaluated through a second arthroscopic procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The surgical duration in Group A was significantly longer than in Group B (P < 0.05). No significant differences in HSS scores were found between the groups at postoperative day 3 and 1 month, while Group A showed significantly higher HSS scores at 3 months and 6 months compared to Group B (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative knee joint complications was lower in Group A than in Group B, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The suture anchor system is effective for both non-weight-bearing and weight-bearing areas of the lateral femoral condyle, especially for small bone fragments, showing favorable clinical results. Compared to traditional hollow compression screw fixation, the suture anchor system significantly reduces postoperative complications and improves knee joint function.</p>","PeriodicalId":6980,"journal":{"name":"Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca","volume":"93 2","pages":"72-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55095/achot2025/046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of the study: To evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy of arthroscopic suture anchor "X" fixation and hollow compression screw fixation in treating lateral femoral condyle osteochondral fractures.

Material and methods: This retrospective study analyzed 31 patients diagnosed with lateral femoral condyle osteochondral fractures, treated at our hospital between June 2015 and July 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical approach: Group A received arthroscopic suture anchor "X" fixation, while Group B underwent arthroscopic hollow compression screw fixation combined with a spacer. HSS scores and excellent outcome rates were assessed at postoperative day 3, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. Additionally, postoperative complications were evaluated through a second arthroscopic procedure.

Results: The surgical duration in Group A was significantly longer than in Group B (P < 0.05). No significant differences in HSS scores were found between the groups at postoperative day 3 and 1 month, while Group A showed significantly higher HSS scores at 3 months and 6 months compared to Group B (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative knee joint complications was lower in Group A than in Group B, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: The suture anchor system is effective for both non-weight-bearing and weight-bearing areas of the lateral femoral condyle, especially for small bone fragments, showing favorable clinical results. Compared to traditional hollow compression screw fixation, the suture anchor system significantly reduces postoperative complications and improves knee joint function.

关节镜下缝合锚钉“X”固定治疗股骨外侧髁骨软骨骨折的疗效分析。
研究目的:评价和比较关节镜下缝合锚钉“X”固定与空心加压螺钉固定治疗股骨外侧髁骨软骨骨折的临床疗效。材料与方法:本回顾性研究分析2015年6月至2024年7月在我院治疗的31例股骨外侧髁骨软骨骨折患者。根据手术入路将患者分为两组:A组采用关节镜下缝合锚钉“X”固定,B组采用关节镜下空心加压螺钉联合垫片固定。分别在术后第3天、1个月、3个月和6个月对HSS评分和优转率进行评估。此外,通过第二次关节镜手术评估术后并发症。结果:A组手术时间明显长于B组(P < 0.05)。术后第3天、1个月各组间HSS评分差异无统计学意义,而A组术后第3个月、6个月HSS评分显著高于B组(P < 0.05)。A组术后膝关节并发症发生率低于B组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:缝合锚钉系统对股骨外侧髁非负重区和负重区均有效,尤其对小块骨碎片均有较好的临床效果。与传统的空心加压螺钉固定相比,缝合锚钉系统可显著减少术后并发症,改善膝关节功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Editorial Board accepts for publication articles, reports from congresses, fellowships, book reviews, reports concerning activities of orthopaedic and other relating specialised societies, reports on anniversaries of outstanding personalities in orthopaedics and announcements of congresses and symposia being prepared. Articles include original papers, case reports and current concepts reviews and recently also instructional lectures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书