Understanding unnecessary stops and police use of force in NYPD Stop, Question, and Frisk with machine learning techniques

IF 5.3 2区 社会学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Passiri Bodhidatta, Daricha Sutivong
{"title":"Understanding unnecessary stops and police use of force in NYPD Stop, Question, and Frisk with machine learning techniques","authors":"Passiri Bodhidatta,&nbsp;Daricha Sutivong","doi":"10.1007/s10506-025-09444-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Even though the New York Police Department (NYPD) reform in 2013 led to a substantial reduction in the total number of stops, unnecessary stops and weapon use against innocent citizens remain critical issues. This study analyzes stop-and-frisk records during 2014 – 2019 using tree-based machine learning approaches along with logistic regression and Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) models, in order to discover patterns and insights. By developing predictive models for both suspect convictions and the level of force applied by police, this study provides a basis for a discussion whether weapon usage aligns with indicators of guilt or conviction. Findings show that XGBoost outperforms other machine learning techniques in predicting both conviction and the level of force used. Key factors associated with a suspect’s conviction include weapon possession, carrying suspicious objects, and trespassing. However, an excessive number of unnecessary stops appear to be associated with inaccurate assumptions about suspects’ weapon possession, which are also linked to police gunfire against innocent citizens. Refining suspicion criteria for Criminal Possession of Weapon and suspect actions could help reduce unnecessary stops and excessive force.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51336,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","volume":"34 2","pages":"587 - 623"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10506-025-09444-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Even though the New York Police Department (NYPD) reform in 2013 led to a substantial reduction in the total number of stops, unnecessary stops and weapon use against innocent citizens remain critical issues. This study analyzes stop-and-frisk records during 2014 – 2019 using tree-based machine learning approaches along with logistic regression and Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) models, in order to discover patterns and insights. By developing predictive models for both suspect convictions and the level of force applied by police, this study provides a basis for a discussion whether weapon usage aligns with indicators of guilt or conviction. Findings show that XGBoost outperforms other machine learning techniques in predicting both conviction and the level of force used. Key factors associated with a suspect’s conviction include weapon possession, carrying suspicious objects, and trespassing. However, an excessive number of unnecessary stops appear to be associated with inaccurate assumptions about suspects’ weapon possession, which are also linked to police gunfire against innocent citizens. Refining suspicion criteria for Criminal Possession of Weapon and suspect actions could help reduce unnecessary stops and excessive force.

Abstract Image

用机器学习技术理解纽约警察局拦截、询问和搜身中不必要的拦截和警察使用武力
尽管纽约警察局2013年的改革导致截停次数大幅减少,但不必要的截停和对无辜公民使用武器仍然是关键问题。本研究使用基于树的机器学习方法以及逻辑回归和多层感知器(MLP)模型分析了2014年至2019年期间的拦截盘查记录,以发现模式和见解。通过开发嫌疑人定罪和警察使用武力水平的预测模型,本研究为讨论武器使用是否与犯罪或定罪指标一致提供了基础。研究结果表明,XGBoost在预测定罪和使用武力水平方面优于其他机器学习技术。与嫌疑人定罪相关的关键因素包括持有武器、携带可疑物品和非法侵入。然而,不必要的拦截次数过多似乎与对嫌疑人拥有武器的不准确假设有关,这也与警察向无辜公民开枪有关。细化刑事持有武器和可疑行为的怀疑标准可以帮助减少不必要的拦截和过度使用武力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
26.80%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Artificial Intelligence and Law is an international forum for the dissemination of original interdisciplinary research in the following areas: Theoretical or empirical studies in artificial intelligence (AI), cognitive psychology, jurisprudence, linguistics, or philosophy which address the development of formal or computational models of legal knowledge, reasoning, and decision making. In-depth studies of innovative artificial intelligence systems that are being used in the legal domain. Studies which address the legal, ethical and social implications of the field of Artificial Intelligence and Law. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to, the following: Computational models of legal reasoning and decision making; judgmental reasoning, adversarial reasoning, case-based reasoning, deontic reasoning, and normative reasoning. Formal representation of legal knowledge: deontic notions, normative modalities, rights, factors, values, rules. Jurisprudential theories of legal reasoning. Specialized logics for law. Psychological and linguistic studies concerning legal reasoning. Legal expert systems; statutory systems, legal practice systems, predictive systems, and normative systems. AI and law support for legislative drafting, judicial decision-making, and public administration. Intelligent processing of legal documents; conceptual retrieval of cases and statutes, automatic text understanding, intelligent document assembly systems, hypertext, and semantic markup of legal documents. Intelligent processing of legal information on the World Wide Web, legal ontologies, automated intelligent legal agents, electronic legal institutions, computational models of legal texts. Ramifications for AI and Law in e-Commerce, automatic contracting and negotiation, digital rights management, and automated dispute resolution. Ramifications for AI and Law in e-governance, e-government, e-Democracy, and knowledge-based systems supporting public services, public dialogue and mediation. Intelligent computer-assisted instructional systems in law or ethics. Evaluation and auditing techniques for legal AI systems. Systemic problems in the construction and delivery of legal AI systems. Impact of AI on the law and legal institutions. Ethical issues concerning legal AI systems. In addition to original research contributions, the Journal will include a Book Review section, a series of Technology Reports describing existing and emerging products, applications and technologies, and a Research Notes section of occasional essays posing interesting and timely research challenges for the field of Artificial Intelligence and Law. Financial support for the Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Law is provided by the University of Pittsburgh School of Law.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书