{"title":"Understanding unnecessary stops and police use of force in NYPD Stop, Question, and Frisk with machine learning techniques","authors":"Passiri Bodhidatta, Daricha Sutivong","doi":"10.1007/s10506-025-09444-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Even though the New York Police Department (NYPD) reform in 2013 led to a substantial reduction in the total number of stops, unnecessary stops and weapon use against innocent citizens remain critical issues. This study analyzes stop-and-frisk records during 2014 – 2019 using tree-based machine learning approaches along with logistic regression and Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) models, in order to discover patterns and insights. By developing predictive models for both suspect convictions and the level of force applied by police, this study provides a basis for a discussion whether weapon usage aligns with indicators of guilt or conviction. Findings show that XGBoost outperforms other machine learning techniques in predicting both conviction and the level of force used. Key factors associated with a suspect’s conviction include weapon possession, carrying suspicious objects, and trespassing. However, an excessive number of unnecessary stops appear to be associated with inaccurate assumptions about suspects’ weapon possession, which are also linked to police gunfire against innocent citizens. Refining suspicion criteria for Criminal Possession of Weapon and suspect actions could help reduce unnecessary stops and excessive force.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51336,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","volume":"34 2","pages":"587 - 623"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence and Law","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10506-025-09444-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Even though the New York Police Department (NYPD) reform in 2013 led to a substantial reduction in the total number of stops, unnecessary stops and weapon use against innocent citizens remain critical issues. This study analyzes stop-and-frisk records during 2014 – 2019 using tree-based machine learning approaches along with logistic regression and Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) models, in order to discover patterns and insights. By developing predictive models for both suspect convictions and the level of force applied by police, this study provides a basis for a discussion whether weapon usage aligns with indicators of guilt or conviction. Findings show that XGBoost outperforms other machine learning techniques in predicting both conviction and the level of force used. Key factors associated with a suspect’s conviction include weapon possession, carrying suspicious objects, and trespassing. However, an excessive number of unnecessary stops appear to be associated with inaccurate assumptions about suspects’ weapon possession, which are also linked to police gunfire against innocent citizens. Refining suspicion criteria for Criminal Possession of Weapon and suspect actions could help reduce unnecessary stops and excessive force.
期刊介绍:
Artificial Intelligence and Law is an international forum for the dissemination of original interdisciplinary research in the following areas: Theoretical or empirical studies in artificial intelligence (AI), cognitive psychology, jurisprudence, linguistics, or philosophy which address the development of formal or computational models of legal knowledge, reasoning, and decision making. In-depth studies of innovative artificial intelligence systems that are being used in the legal domain. Studies which address the legal, ethical and social implications of the field of Artificial Intelligence and Law.
Topics of interest include, but are not limited to, the following: Computational models of legal reasoning and decision making; judgmental reasoning, adversarial reasoning, case-based reasoning, deontic reasoning, and normative reasoning. Formal representation of legal knowledge: deontic notions, normative
modalities, rights, factors, values, rules. Jurisprudential theories of legal reasoning. Specialized logics for law. Psychological and linguistic studies concerning legal reasoning. Legal expert systems; statutory systems, legal practice systems, predictive systems, and normative systems. AI and law support for legislative drafting, judicial decision-making, and
public administration. Intelligent processing of legal documents; conceptual retrieval of cases and statutes, automatic text understanding, intelligent document assembly systems, hypertext, and semantic markup of legal documents. Intelligent processing of legal information on the World Wide Web, legal ontologies, automated intelligent legal agents, electronic legal institutions, computational models of legal texts. Ramifications for AI and Law in e-Commerce, automatic contracting and negotiation, digital rights management, and automated dispute resolution. Ramifications for AI and Law in e-governance, e-government, e-Democracy, and knowledge-based systems supporting public services, public dialogue and mediation. Intelligent computer-assisted instructional systems in law or ethics. Evaluation and auditing techniques for legal AI systems. Systemic problems in the construction and delivery of legal AI systems. Impact of AI on the law and legal institutions. Ethical issues concerning legal AI systems. In addition to original research contributions, the Journal will include a Book Review section, a series of Technology Reports describing existing and emerging products, applications and technologies, and a Research Notes section of occasional essays posing interesting and timely research challenges for the field of Artificial Intelligence and Law. Financial support for the Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Law is provided by the University of Pittsburgh School of Law.