Marques R, Lopes M, Pais-Vieira C, Neves-Amado J, Alves P
{"title":"Implementation of Clinical Algorithms in Complex Wound Care: A Pilot Study on Feasibility and Professional Acceptance.","authors":"Marques R, Lopes M, Pais-Vieira C, Neves-Amado J, Alves P","doi":"10.1155/nrp/1833733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Mobile applications that integrate clinical algorithms have the potential to standardize wound assessment and to support clinical decision-making across assessment, diagnostic support, and therapeutic planning in complex wound care. This pilot study explored the feasibility of implementing such algorithms in a mobile application and examined concordance with nurse assessments and professional acceptance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective multicenter pilot cohort study was conducted between June and October 2023 in rehabilitation units, outpatient clinics, primary healthcare, homecare, and hospitals. Adults aged ≥ 18 years with pressure injuries/pressure ulcers, venous leg ulcers, arterial ulcers, or diabetic foot ulcers were eligible. Nurses recorded data using the <i>CWS_Validation</i> application at three time points over 4 weeks. Agreement between algorithm-generated classifications and nurse assessments was analyzed using Cohen's kappa, Fleiss' kappa, and Krippendorff's alpha. Nurse adherence to therapeutic recommendations and perceptions of the alert system were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 49 patients with 56 wounds (mean age = 79 years) were included. Pressure injuries/pressure ulcers were most prevalent (71.4%), particularly categories 3 (25%) and 4 (23.2%). The algorithm provided diagnoses for 46 wounds, with fair overall concordance with nurse assessments (<i>κ</i> = 0.41; 95% CI: 0.24-0.57). Adherence to therapeutic recommendations was high: 85.3% in complete monitoring and 90.3% in partial monitoring. Nurses rated the alert system positively (mean = 4.34, SD = 0.82) in complete monitoring sessions (<i>n</i> = 109).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinical algorithms can be feasibly integrated into mobile applications and are well accepted by nurses across diverse care contexts. These preliminary findings highlight the potential of algorithm-driven tools to support wound assessment and decision-making, while underscoring the need for larger studies with more robust designs to confirm clinical impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":46917,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Research and Practice","volume":"2026 ","pages":"1833733"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13179419/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/nrp/1833733","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Mobile applications that integrate clinical algorithms have the potential to standardize wound assessment and to support clinical decision-making across assessment, diagnostic support, and therapeutic planning in complex wound care. This pilot study explored the feasibility of implementing such algorithms in a mobile application and examined concordance with nurse assessments and professional acceptance.
Methods: A prospective multicenter pilot cohort study was conducted between June and October 2023 in rehabilitation units, outpatient clinics, primary healthcare, homecare, and hospitals. Adults aged ≥ 18 years with pressure injuries/pressure ulcers, venous leg ulcers, arterial ulcers, or diabetic foot ulcers were eligible. Nurses recorded data using the CWS_Validation application at three time points over 4 weeks. Agreement between algorithm-generated classifications and nurse assessments was analyzed using Cohen's kappa, Fleiss' kappa, and Krippendorff's alpha. Nurse adherence to therapeutic recommendations and perceptions of the alert system were also evaluated.
Results: A total of 49 patients with 56 wounds (mean age = 79 years) were included. Pressure injuries/pressure ulcers were most prevalent (71.4%), particularly categories 3 (25%) and 4 (23.2%). The algorithm provided diagnoses for 46 wounds, with fair overall concordance with nurse assessments (κ = 0.41; 95% CI: 0.24-0.57). Adherence to therapeutic recommendations was high: 85.3% in complete monitoring and 90.3% in partial monitoring. Nurses rated the alert system positively (mean = 4.34, SD = 0.82) in complete monitoring sessions (n = 109).
Conclusions: Clinical algorithms can be feasibly integrated into mobile applications and are well accepted by nurses across diverse care contexts. These preliminary findings highlight the potential of algorithm-driven tools to support wound assessment and decision-making, while underscoring the need for larger studies with more robust designs to confirm clinical impact.