Young S Kim, Ji W Yoo, Maryam Tabrizi, Jae-In Ryu, Yonsu Kim, Maria Teresa Chong, Dong-Hun Han, Jong Ho Won, Yoohwan Kim, Iulia Ioanitoaia-Chaudhry, Mark J Rosenberg, Marcia Loo, Claire S Lee, Anderson Penna
{"title":"Managing High-Risk Root Caries with Silver Diamine Fluoride Application: A Markov Simulation Study.","authors":"Young S Kim, Ji W Yoo, Maryam Tabrizi, Jae-In Ryu, Yonsu Kim, Maria Teresa Chong, Dong-Hun Han, Jong Ho Won, Yoohwan Kim, Iulia Ioanitoaia-Chaudhry, Mark J Rosenberg, Marcia Loo, Claire S Lee, Anderson Penna","doi":"10.36469/001c.160210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dental caries are common oral health conditions among Medicaid beneficiaries. Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) has been applied to manage dental caries.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of SDF application for managing high-risk root caries within the context of Medicaid, a Markov simulation model was adopted from a healthcare system perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 45-year-old subject with 21 residual teeth was simulated for 19 years. Twice-yearly 38% SDF application on the tooth surface at risk for caries was compared with 5% sodium fluoride (NaF) varnish in terms of effectiveness and cost. Tooth-years free of extraction were set as the effect.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with 5% NaF varnish, 38% SDF application was cost-effective, with a difference of 6.34 extraction-free tooth-years and an additional cost of <math><mn>7798</mn> <mo>(</mo> <mi>i</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>m</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mi>o</mi> <mi>f</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mi>e</mi> <mi>f</mi> <mi>f</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>v</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mo>,</mo></math> 1229 per extraction-free tooth-year gained; incremental net monetary benefit, $309 355). One-way sensitivity analyses on SDF and NaF costs confirmed cost-effectiveness of SDF application over NaF varnish.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An integrated orosystemic care model is underscored to disseminate the benefits of SDF application as the Medicaid payment system shifts from fee-for-service to managed care. Semiannual 38% SDF application might reduce and delay tooth extraction due to root caries in statewide dental provider shortage areas, particularly \"dental deserts,\" where Medicaid-accepting dentists are not available.</p>","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"13 1","pages":"168-173"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13179781/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36469/001c.160210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Dental caries are common oral health conditions among Medicaid beneficiaries. Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) has been applied to manage dental caries.
Objectives: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of SDF application for managing high-risk root caries within the context of Medicaid, a Markov simulation model was adopted from a healthcare system perspective.
Methods: A 45-year-old subject with 21 residual teeth was simulated for 19 years. Twice-yearly 38% SDF application on the tooth surface at risk for caries was compared with 5% sodium fluoride (NaF) varnish in terms of effectiveness and cost. Tooth-years free of extraction were set as the effect.
Results: Compared with 5% NaF varnish, 38% SDF application was cost-effective, with a difference of 6.34 extraction-free tooth-years and an additional cost of 1229 per extraction-free tooth-year gained; incremental net monetary benefit, $309 355). One-way sensitivity analyses on SDF and NaF costs confirmed cost-effectiveness of SDF application over NaF varnish.
Conclusions: An integrated orosystemic care model is underscored to disseminate the benefits of SDF application as the Medicaid payment system shifts from fee-for-service to managed care. Semiannual 38% SDF application might reduce and delay tooth extraction due to root caries in statewide dental provider shortage areas, particularly "dental deserts," where Medicaid-accepting dentists are not available.