Managing High-Risk Root Caries with Silver Diamine Fluoride Application: A Markov Simulation Study.

IF 2.5 Q2 ECONOMICS
Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2026-05-14 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.36469/001c.160210
Young S Kim, Ji W Yoo, Maryam Tabrizi, Jae-In Ryu, Yonsu Kim, Maria Teresa Chong, Dong-Hun Han, Jong Ho Won, Yoohwan Kim, Iulia Ioanitoaia-Chaudhry, Mark J Rosenberg, Marcia Loo, Claire S Lee, Anderson Penna
{"title":"Managing High-Risk Root Caries with Silver Diamine Fluoride Application: A Markov Simulation Study.","authors":"Young S Kim, Ji W Yoo, Maryam Tabrizi, Jae-In Ryu, Yonsu Kim, Maria Teresa Chong, Dong-Hun Han, Jong Ho Won, Yoohwan Kim, Iulia Ioanitoaia-Chaudhry, Mark J Rosenberg, Marcia Loo, Claire S Lee, Anderson Penna","doi":"10.36469/001c.160210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dental caries are common oral health conditions among Medicaid beneficiaries. Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) has been applied to manage dental caries.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of SDF application for managing high-risk root caries within the context of Medicaid, a Markov simulation model was adopted from a healthcare system perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 45-year-old subject with 21 residual teeth was simulated for 19 years. Twice-yearly 38% SDF application on the tooth surface at risk for caries was compared with 5% sodium fluoride (NaF) varnish in terms of effectiveness and cost. Tooth-years free of extraction were set as the effect.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with 5% NaF varnish, 38% SDF application was cost-effective, with a difference of 6.34 extraction-free tooth-years and an additional cost of <math><mn>7798</mn> <mo>(</mo> <mi>i</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>m</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mi>o</mi> <mi>f</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mi>e</mi> <mi>f</mi> <mi>f</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>v</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mo>,</mo></math> 1229 per extraction-free tooth-year gained; incremental net monetary benefit, $309 355). One-way sensitivity analyses on SDF and NaF costs confirmed cost-effectiveness of SDF application over NaF varnish.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An integrated orosystemic care model is underscored to disseminate the benefits of SDF application as the Medicaid payment system shifts from fee-for-service to managed care. Semiannual 38% SDF application might reduce and delay tooth extraction due to root caries in statewide dental provider shortage areas, particularly \"dental deserts,\" where Medicaid-accepting dentists are not available.</p>","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"13 1","pages":"168-173"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13179781/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36469/001c.160210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dental caries are common oral health conditions among Medicaid beneficiaries. Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) has been applied to manage dental caries.

Objectives: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of SDF application for managing high-risk root caries within the context of Medicaid, a Markov simulation model was adopted from a healthcare system perspective.

Methods: A 45-year-old subject with 21 residual teeth was simulated for 19 years. Twice-yearly 38% SDF application on the tooth surface at risk for caries was compared with 5% sodium fluoride (NaF) varnish in terms of effectiveness and cost. Tooth-years free of extraction were set as the effect.

Results: Compared with 5% NaF varnish, 38% SDF application was cost-effective, with a difference of 6.34 extraction-free tooth-years and an additional cost of 7798 ( i n c r e m e n t a l c o s t - o f - e f f e c t i v e n e s s r a t i o , 1229 per extraction-free tooth-year gained; incremental net monetary benefit, $309 355). One-way sensitivity analyses on SDF and NaF costs confirmed cost-effectiveness of SDF application over NaF varnish.

Conclusions: An integrated orosystemic care model is underscored to disseminate the benefits of SDF application as the Medicaid payment system shifts from fee-for-service to managed care. Semiannual 38% SDF application might reduce and delay tooth extraction due to root caries in statewide dental provider shortage areas, particularly "dental deserts," where Medicaid-accepting dentists are not available.

应用氟化二胺银管理高危牙根龋:马尔科夫模拟研究。
背景:龋齿是医疗补助受益人中常见的口腔健康状况。二胺氟化银(SDF)已被应用于治疗龋齿。目的:为了评估在医疗补助的背景下应用SDF管理高风险牙根龋的成本效益,从医疗保健系统的角度采用了马尔可夫模拟模型。方法:对一名45岁、21颗残牙的受试者进行19年模拟。在有龋齿风险的牙齿表面每年两次使用38%的SDF与5%氟化钠(NaF)清漆在效果和成本方面进行了比较。以无拔牙牙龄作为影响因素。结果:与5%的NaF清漆相比,38%的SDF应用具有成本效益,差异为6.34个无牙年,额外成本为7798美元(1个月的无牙年,1个月的无牙年,1个月的无牙年,1个月的无牙年,1个月的无牙年,1个月的无牙年,1个月的无牙年,1个月的无牙年,1个月的无牙年,增加的净货币效益为309355美元)。对SDF和NaF成本的单向敏感性分析证实了SDF应用于NaF清漆的成本效益。结论:在医疗补助支付系统从按服务收费向管理式医疗转变的过程中,强调了一种综合的系统护理模式,以传播SDF应用的好处。半年度38%的SDF申请可能会减少和延迟因牙根龋齿而导致的拔牙,特别是在全州牙科提供者短缺的地区,特别是“牙科沙漠”,那里没有接受医疗补助的牙医。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书