Peter N. Taylor, Malcolm Prentice, Sarah Bath, Emilie Combet, Nadia Schoenmakers, Vicki E. Smith, Fraser W. Gibb, Nicola Zammitt, Onyebuchi Okosieme, Kristien Boelaert, John Lazarus, Mark Vanderpump
{"title":"What Endocrinologists Should Know About Iodine: Population Deficiency, Individual Excess and Misinformation in the United Kingdom","authors":"Peter N. Taylor, Malcolm Prentice, Sarah Bath, Emilie Combet, Nadia Schoenmakers, Vicki E. Smith, Fraser W. Gibb, Nicola Zammitt, Onyebuchi Okosieme, Kristien Boelaert, John Lazarus, Mark Vanderpump","doi":"10.1111/cen.70162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Iodine deficiency, once considered eliminated in the United Kingdom, has re-emerged, particularly among women of reproductive age, in whom requirements are increased during pregnancy and lactation. The declining consumption of dairy and white fish, the emerging use of unfortified plant-based milk alternatives, and the absence of a national iodisation policy have contributed to a return of mild to moderate iodine deficiency. Vegans and individuals avoiding dairy are at particular risk. Simultaneously, social-media-driven wellness trends promote ‘thyroid detoxes’ or ‘iodine resets’ and kelp-based supplements that deliver supraphysiological iodine doses far exceeding recommended intake. Endocrinologists now face a dual challenge: widespread under-recognition of population iodine insufficiency and a growing minority of patients presenting with iodine-induced thyroid dysfunction. This review summarises current UK iodine status, the physiological and clinical relevance of iodine to thyroid and neurodevelopmental health, modern dietary risk factors and the clinical approach to those influenced by online misinformation. Routine dietary counselling and public health fortification represent cost-effective interventions to prevent both extremes. Population-based solutions would correct iodine status efficiently and align the UK with other high-income countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":10346,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Endocrinology","volume":"105 5","pages":"523-530"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cen.70162","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cen.70162","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Iodine deficiency, once considered eliminated in the United Kingdom, has re-emerged, particularly among women of reproductive age, in whom requirements are increased during pregnancy and lactation. The declining consumption of dairy and white fish, the emerging use of unfortified plant-based milk alternatives, and the absence of a national iodisation policy have contributed to a return of mild to moderate iodine deficiency. Vegans and individuals avoiding dairy are at particular risk. Simultaneously, social-media-driven wellness trends promote ‘thyroid detoxes’ or ‘iodine resets’ and kelp-based supplements that deliver supraphysiological iodine doses far exceeding recommended intake. Endocrinologists now face a dual challenge: widespread under-recognition of population iodine insufficiency and a growing minority of patients presenting with iodine-induced thyroid dysfunction. This review summarises current UK iodine status, the physiological and clinical relevance of iodine to thyroid and neurodevelopmental health, modern dietary risk factors and the clinical approach to those influenced by online misinformation. Routine dietary counselling and public health fortification represent cost-effective interventions to prevent both extremes. Population-based solutions would correct iodine status efficiently and align the UK with other high-income countries.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Endocrinology publishes papers and reviews which focus on the clinical aspects of endocrinology, including the clinical application of molecular endocrinology. It does not publish papers relating directly to diabetes care and clinical management. It features reviews, original papers, commentaries, correspondence and Clinical Questions. Clinical Endocrinology is essential reading not only for those engaged in endocrinological research but also for those involved primarily in clinical practice.