Through the Lens of the Carers: A Qualitative Study on Barriers, Resources, and Opportunities for Improvement in Suicide Prevention in (Psycho-)Oncology.
Tamara Schwinn, Judith Hirschmiller, Jörg Wiltink, Rüdiger Zwerenz, Elmar Brähler, Manfred E Beutel, Mareike Ernst
{"title":"Through the Lens of the Carers: A Qualitative Study on Barriers, Resources, and Opportunities for Improvement in Suicide Prevention in (Psycho-)Oncology.","authors":"Tamara Schwinn, Judith Hirschmiller, Jörg Wiltink, Rüdiger Zwerenz, Elmar Brähler, Manfred E Beutel, Mareike Ernst","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2025.2533195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cancer patients are at increased risk for suicidal crises, making suicide prevention a pertinent issue for clinical practice. However, international research suggests that healthcare providers are anxious and, for example, do not actively inquire about suicidality. Such avoidance does not follow expert recommendations and puts patients at risk. First international investigations have reported diverse barriers standing in the way of the recommended clinical care. The present study aimed to expand this investigation to the German context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A preregistered qualitative study following a semi-structured interview guide was conducted with healthcare professionals (HCPs) (<i>N</i> = 20) working in the oncological setting. The interviews were transcribed and analyzed using qualitative content analysis, following an explorative theory-generating approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The main result was a category system giving insight into both <i>barriers</i> and <i>resources</i> HCPs experienced concerning suicide prevention in their practice. <i>Barriers</i> comprised structural (e.g., scarcity of resources) and personal ones (e.g., lack of knowledge, difficult feelings). <i>Resources</i> were distinguished into work-related support, self-efficacy and skills, and private life/after work as an important equalizer. Along with the mentioned personal and structural dimensions, HCPs also highlighted possibilities for improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results provide an important basis for the development of needs-based solutions to strengthen suicide prevention in oncology. The study highlights that this can be achieved by both individual-level interventions (e.g., specific training) as well as organization-level changes (e.g., better implementation of standard operating procedures and shared responsibility). Addressing the reported shortcomings will support practitioners and improve clinical practice for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":"30 2","pages":"365-386"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Suicide Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2025.2533195","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Cancer patients are at increased risk for suicidal crises, making suicide prevention a pertinent issue for clinical practice. However, international research suggests that healthcare providers are anxious and, for example, do not actively inquire about suicidality. Such avoidance does not follow expert recommendations and puts patients at risk. First international investigations have reported diverse barriers standing in the way of the recommended clinical care. The present study aimed to expand this investigation to the German context.
Methods: A preregistered qualitative study following a semi-structured interview guide was conducted with healthcare professionals (HCPs) (N = 20) working in the oncological setting. The interviews were transcribed and analyzed using qualitative content analysis, following an explorative theory-generating approach.
Results: The main result was a category system giving insight into both barriers and resources HCPs experienced concerning suicide prevention in their practice. Barriers comprised structural (e.g., scarcity of resources) and personal ones (e.g., lack of knowledge, difficult feelings). Resources were distinguished into work-related support, self-efficacy and skills, and private life/after work as an important equalizer. Along with the mentioned personal and structural dimensions, HCPs also highlighted possibilities for improvement.
Conclusions: The results provide an important basis for the development of needs-based solutions to strengthen suicide prevention in oncology. The study highlights that this can be achieved by both individual-level interventions (e.g., specific training) as well as organization-level changes (e.g., better implementation of standard operating procedures and shared responsibility). Addressing the reported shortcomings will support practitioners and improve clinical practice for patients.
期刊介绍：
Archives of Suicide Research, the official journal of the International Academy of Suicide Research (IASR), is the international journal in the field of suicidology. The journal features original, refereed contributions on the study of suicide, suicidal behavior, its causes and effects, and techniques for prevention. The journal incorporates research-based and theoretical articles contributed by a diverse range of authors interested in investigating the biological, pharmacological, psychiatric, psychological, and sociological aspects of suicide.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
