E-cigarette use among individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Internal and Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-16 DOI:10.1007/s11739-026-04385-z
Sultan Alhabdan, Abdalkareem Alashjaai, Yusuff Adebayo Adebisi
{"title":"E-cigarette use among individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.","authors":"Sultan Alhabdan, Abdalkareem Alashjaai, Yusuff Adebayo Adebisi","doi":"10.1007/s11739-026-04385-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is strongly linked to tobacco smoking, and smoking cessation is central to disease management. E-cigarettes are widely promoted as a harm reduction option in the United Kingdom, yet patterns of use among people with COPD remain poorly described. This study examined the prevalence and correlates of current e-cigarette use among individuals with COPD in Scotland using data from the 2018 to 2022 Scottish Health Survey. The analysis included adults aged 16 years and above who reported a COPD diagnosis (n = 891). Survey-weighted logistic regression was used to estimate crude and adjusted associations between sociodemographic, behavioural, and health characteristics and current e-cigarette use, with additional models stratified by smoking status and smoking intensity. The weighted prevalence of current e-cigarette use was 11.9% (95%CI 9.7-14.5). Older age was associated with lower odds of current use (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.60; 95%CI 0.41-0.89), while socioeconomic deprivation showed a positive gradient (aOR 1.21; 95%CI 1.01-1.45). Smoking status was the strongest correlate: odds were higher among ex-smokers (aOR 10.80; 95%CI 1.66-70.06) and current smokers (aOR 14.86; 95%CI 2.37-93.33) compared with never-smokers. Among current smokers, younger age, female sex, and higher deprivation were associated with use, whereas no clear determinants were identified among former smokers. Light and moderate smokers had greater odds of current e-cigarette use than non-smokers, while heavy smokers did not differ. Overall, e-cigarette use was relatively common and concentrated among younger, more deprived adults with a smoking history. Longitudinal studies are needed to determine the implications for respiratory outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13662,"journal":{"name":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2087-2097"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13582131/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-026-04385-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is strongly linked to tobacco smoking, and smoking cessation is central to disease management. E-cigarettes are widely promoted as a harm reduction option in the United Kingdom, yet patterns of use among people with COPD remain poorly described. This study examined the prevalence and correlates of current e-cigarette use among individuals with COPD in Scotland using data from the 2018 to 2022 Scottish Health Survey. The analysis included adults aged 16 years and above who reported a COPD diagnosis (n = 891). Survey-weighted logistic regression was used to estimate crude and adjusted associations between sociodemographic, behavioural, and health characteristics and current e-cigarette use, with additional models stratified by smoking status and smoking intensity. The weighted prevalence of current e-cigarette use was 11.9% (95%CI 9.7-14.5). Older age was associated with lower odds of current use (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.60; 95%CI 0.41-0.89), while socioeconomic deprivation showed a positive gradient (aOR 1.21; 95%CI 1.01-1.45). Smoking status was the strongest correlate: odds were higher among ex-smokers (aOR 10.80; 95%CI 1.66-70.06) and current smokers (aOR 14.86; 95%CI 2.37-93.33) compared with never-smokers. Among current smokers, younger age, female sex, and higher deprivation were associated with use, whereas no clear determinants were identified among former smokers. Light and moderate smokers had greater odds of current e-cigarette use than non-smokers, while heavy smokers did not differ. Overall, e-cigarette use was relatively common and concentrated among younger, more deprived adults with a smoking history. Longitudinal studies are needed to determine the implications for respiratory outcomes.

慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者使用电子烟的情况。
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)与吸烟密切相关,戒烟是疾病管理的核心。在英国,电子烟作为一种减少危害的选择被广泛推广,但COPD患者的使用模式仍然缺乏描述。本研究使用2018年至2022年苏格兰健康调查的数据,调查了苏格兰慢性阻塞性肺病患者中当前电子烟使用的患病率和相关因素。该分析包括16岁及以上报告COPD诊断的成年人(n = 891)。使用调查加权逻辑回归来估计社会人口学、行为和健康特征与当前电子烟使用之间的粗略和调整后的关联,并使用按吸烟状况和吸烟强度分层的附加模型。当前电子烟使用的加权流行率为11.9% (95%CI 9.7-14.5)。年龄越大,当前使用药物的几率越低(调整比值比[aOR] 0.60; 95%CI 0.41-0.89),而社会经济剥夺呈正梯度(aOR为1.21;95%CI为1.01-1.45)。吸烟状况的相关性最强:与从不吸烟者相比,戒烟者(aOR 10.80; 95%CI 1.66-70.06)和当前吸烟者(aOR 14.86; 95%CI 2.37-93.33)的风险更高。在当前吸烟者中,年龄更小、女性和更严重的剥夺与使用有关,而在前吸烟者中没有明确的决定因素。轻度和中度吸烟者目前使用电子烟的几率高于不吸烟者,而重度吸烟者则没有差异。总体而言,电子烟的使用相对普遍,集中在有吸烟史的年轻、贫困的成年人中。需要进行纵向研究以确定对呼吸结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Internal and Emergency Medicine
Internal and Emergency Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
258
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Internal and Emergency Medicine (IEM) is an independent, international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal designed for internists and emergency physicians. IEM publishes a variety of manuscript types including Original investigations, Review articles, Letters to the Editor, Editorials and Commentaries. Occasionally IEM accepts unsolicited Reviews, Commentaries or Editorials. The journal is divided into three sections, i.e., Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment, with three separate editorial boards. In the Internal Medicine section, invited Case records and Physical examinations, devoted to underlining the role of a clinical approach in selected clinical cases, are also published. The Emergency Medicine section will include a Morbidity and Mortality Report and an Airway Forum concerning the management of difficult airway problems. As far as Critical Care is becoming an integral part of Emergency Medicine, a new sub-section will report the literature that concerns the interface not only for the care of the critical patient in the Emergency Department, but also in the Intensive Care Unit. Finally, in the Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment section brief discussions of topics of evidence-based medicine (Cochrane’s corner) and Research updates are published. IEM encourages letters of rebuttal and criticism of published articles. Topics of interest include all subjects that relate to the science and practice of Internal and Emergency Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书