{"title":"Effectiveness of Different Exercises for Relieving Menstrual Symptoms: A Narrative Review.","authors":"Tanisha Chaurasia, Yash Pratap, Aniket Karn","doi":"10.1002/pri.70229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Menstrual problems such as dysmenorrhea and premenstrual syndrome affect a significant proportion of women during their reproductive years and often cause problems in mood, productivity, and day-to-day activities. A safe and non-invasive alternative to pharmacological treatments, which may be associated with adverse effects, is exercise.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This narrative review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of different exercise interventions in reducing menstrual symptoms.</p><p><strong>Materials and procedures: </strong>This narrative review summarised studies published between January 2000 and December 2023 from the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, PEDro, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus and Google Scholar. A total of 86 studies were included with women aged 18-35 years with dysmenorrhea or PMS. Studies that evaluated aerobic, resistance, stretching, yoga or multimodal exercise interventions for ≥ 4 weeks were included. Non-English studies, case reports and studies that used a pharmacological intervention were excluded. Extracted data included study design, intervention, outcome and adherence.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>The narrative synthesis approach was followed. The risk of bias of the included studies was extracted using the ROBINS-I approach. Meta-analysis was not successful due to the variation in study methods and findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results indicate that yoga and aerobic therapy interventions demonstrated consistent improvements in overall health and a reduction in the severity of pain. Stretching and resistance training interventions also offer benefits, but the consequences are much less clear. Multimodal interventions have the potential to address both physical and psychological issues. There were no major adverse effects reported overall, and compliance was high.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Exercise interventions appear to be effective, safe, and clinically applicable for managing menstrual discomfort, that is, aerobic and yoga interventions. More high-quality randomised controlled trials are needed to support clinical recommendations. This review uniquely provides a comparative synthesis across multiple therapeutic exercise modalities and highlights clinically relevant dose-response patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":47243,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Research International","volume":"31 3","pages":"e70229"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.70229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Menstrual problems such as dysmenorrhea and premenstrual syndrome affect a significant proportion of women during their reproductive years and often cause problems in mood, productivity, and day-to-day activities. A safe and non-invasive alternative to pharmacological treatments, which may be associated with adverse effects, is exercise.
Aim: This narrative review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of different exercise interventions in reducing menstrual symptoms.
Materials and procedures: This narrative review summarised studies published between January 2000 and December 2023 from the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, PEDro, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus and Google Scholar. A total of 86 studies were included with women aged 18-35 years with dysmenorrhea or PMS. Studies that evaluated aerobic, resistance, stretching, yoga or multimodal exercise interventions for ≥ 4 weeks were included. Non-English studies, case reports and studies that used a pharmacological intervention were excluded. Extracted data included study design, intervention, outcome and adherence.
Statistical analysis: The narrative synthesis approach was followed. The risk of bias of the included studies was extracted using the ROBINS-I approach. Meta-analysis was not successful due to the variation in study methods and findings.
Results: The results indicate that yoga and aerobic therapy interventions demonstrated consistent improvements in overall health and a reduction in the severity of pain. Stretching and resistance training interventions also offer benefits, but the consequences are much less clear. Multimodal interventions have the potential to address both physical and psychological issues. There were no major adverse effects reported overall, and compliance was high.
Conclusion: Exercise interventions appear to be effective, safe, and clinically applicable for managing menstrual discomfort, that is, aerobic and yoga interventions. More high-quality randomised controlled trials are needed to support clinical recommendations. This review uniquely provides a comparative synthesis across multiple therapeutic exercise modalities and highlights clinically relevant dose-response patterns.
期刊介绍:
Physiotherapy Research International is an international peer reviewed journal dedicated to the exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to specialist areas of physiotherapy theory, practice, and research. Our aim is to promote a high level of scholarship and build on the current evidence base to inform the advancement of the physiotherapy profession. We publish original research on a wide range of topics e.g. Primary research testing new physiotherapy treatments; methodological research; measurement and outcome research and qualitative research of interest to researchers, clinicians and educators. Further, we aim to publish high quality papers that represent the range of cultures and settings where physiotherapy services are delivered. We attract a wide readership from physiotherapists and others working in diverse clinical and academic settings. We aim to promote an international debate amongst the profession about current best evidence based practice. Papers are directed primarily towards the physiotherapy profession, but can be relevant to a wide range of professional groups. The growth of interdisciplinary research is also key to our aims and scope, and we encourage relevant submissions from other professional groups. The journal actively encourages submissions which utilise a breadth of different methodologies and research designs to facilitate addressing key questions related to the physiotherapy practice. PRI seeks to encourage good quality topical debates on a range of relevant issues and promote critical reflection on decision making and implementation of physiotherapy interventions.