Trends in income effects of education mismatch and skill mismatch among Chinese undergraduate graduates from 2018 to 2022

IF 2.6 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Genshu Lu , Xiaojuan Cheng
{"title":"Trends in income effects of education mismatch and skill mismatch among Chinese undergraduate graduates from 2018 to 2022","authors":"Genshu Lu ,&nbsp;Xiaojuan Cheng","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2026.103592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As higher education expands, concerns about its value have arisen due to rising educational mismatches among undergraduate graduates. Using data from the Shaanxi University Graduates’ Employment and Entrepreneurship Quality Tracking Survey from 2018 to 2022, this study employs multiple linear regression and Heckman’s two-step method to analyze the distribution patterns, income effects, and trends associated with education and skill mismatches among Chinese undergraduate graduates. Key findings include: (1) The proportion of various education and skill mismatch combinations ranged from 47.86% to 53.87%, indicating that nearly half of undergraduate graduates face education or skill mismatch risks. (2) A weak but stable correlation exists between educational mismatch and skill mismatch in employment. (3) Different combinations of education and skill mismatch result in distinct income effects compared to the genuine educational match (the reference category). Specifically, compared to the reference category, the matched-in-education but overskilled category yields an income premium due to superior skill, consistent with human capital theory; the mismatch types related to overeducation impose an income penalty because these individuals are generally employed in lower-level positions, aligning with job competition theory. Over time, the earnings premium associated with combinations of education and skill mismatch tends to decrease, while the earnings penalty increases. Our findings are contextualized within China’s economic development and higher education policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48004,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Development","volume":"123 ","pages":"Article 103592"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Development","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059326001021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As higher education expands, concerns about its value have arisen due to rising educational mismatches among undergraduate graduates. Using data from the Shaanxi University Graduates’ Employment and Entrepreneurship Quality Tracking Survey from 2018 to 2022, this study employs multiple linear regression and Heckman’s two-step method to analyze the distribution patterns, income effects, and trends associated with education and skill mismatches among Chinese undergraduate graduates. Key findings include: (1) The proportion of various education and skill mismatch combinations ranged from 47.86% to 53.87%, indicating that nearly half of undergraduate graduates face education or skill mismatch risks. (2) A weak but stable correlation exists between educational mismatch and skill mismatch in employment. (3) Different combinations of education and skill mismatch result in distinct income effects compared to the genuine educational match (the reference category). Specifically, compared to the reference category, the matched-in-education but overskilled category yields an income premium due to superior skill, consistent with human capital theory; the mismatch types related to overeducation impose an income penalty because these individuals are generally employed in lower-level positions, aligning with job competition theory. Over time, the earnings premium associated with combinations of education and skill mismatch tends to decrease, while the earnings penalty increases. Our findings are contextualized within China’s economic development and higher education policies.
2018 - 2022年中国本科毕业生教育错配和技能错配的收入效应趋势
随着高等教育的扩张,由于本科毕业生的教育不匹配现象日益严重,人们对高等教育的价值产生了担忧。本文利用2018 - 2022年陕西省高校毕业生就业创业质量跟踪调查数据,运用多元线性回归和Heckman两步法,分析了我国本科毕业生教育与技能失配的分布格局、收入效应和趋势。主要发现包括:(1)各类学历和技能错配组合比例在47.86% ~ 53.87%之间,表明近一半的本科毕业生面临学历或技能错配风险。(2)学历错配与就业技能错配之间存在较弱但稳定的相关关系。(3)与真正的教育匹配(参考类别)相比,不同的教育与技能匹配组合导致不同的收入效应。具体而言,与参考类别相比,受过教育但技能过剩的类别由于技能出众而产生收入溢价,这与人力资本理论相一致;与过度教育相关的不匹配类型造成了收入损失,因为这些人通常在较低的职位上工作,与工作竞争理论相一致。随着时间的推移,与教育和技能不匹配相结合的收入溢价趋于减少,而收入惩罚则增加。我们的研究结果是在中国经济发展和高等教育政策的背景下进行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Educational Development
International Journal of Educational Development EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of the International Journal of Educational Development is to foster critical debate about the role that education plays in development. IJED seeks both to develop new theoretical insights into the education-development relationship and new understandings of the extent and nature of educational change in diverse settings. It stresses the importance of understanding the interplay of local, national, regional and global contexts and dynamics in shaping education and development. Orthodox notions of development as being about growth, industrialisation or poverty reduction are increasingly questioned. There are competing accounts that stress the human dimensions of development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书