Evaluating the effectiveness of the medium of instruction on learning outcomes in technical subjects among Indian undergraduates: A quasi-experimental cross-over study

IF 2.6 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Deeksha Gupta, Deepti Sharda, Navdeep Kaur, Ritika Bansal
{"title":"Evaluating the effectiveness of the medium of instruction on learning outcomes in technical subjects among Indian undergraduates: A quasi-experimental cross-over study","authors":"Deeksha Gupta,&nbsp;Deepti Sharda,&nbsp;Navdeep Kaur,&nbsp;Ritika Bansal","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2026.103589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The medium of instruction plays a pivotal role in shaping students’ academic performance, engagement, and learning behavior—particularly in linguistically diverse contexts like India. This study investigates the pedagogical efficacy of bilingual (Hindi-English) versus monolingual (English-only) instruction in technical education, focusing on two core Computer Science subjects: Operating System Concepts and Object-Oriented Programming using C++. A quasi-experimental cross-over design was employed with undergraduate students, integrating pre-tests, four formative assessments, post-tests, structured feedback, and instructor observations. Quantitative results revealed that bilingual instruction led to significantly greater learning gains in abstract topics like Memory Management, as evidenced by paired t-tests and Mixed ANOVA. In contrast, programming concepts such as Constructors and Operator Overloading showed no significant post-test differences between the two modes, suggesting mode-neutral efficacy for syntax-driven content. Qualitative insights indicated enhanced clarity, emotional comfort, and active participation under bilingual instruction, particularly for students with limited English proficiency. Instructors observed improved in-class interaction and fewer post-class queries during bilingual sessions. This study fills a critical gap by offering empirical evidence on instructional language design in STEM education. It supports the development of a flexible bilingual teaching approach that improves student achievement and serves as a step toward expanding multilingual practices in higher education.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48004,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Development","volume":"123 ","pages":"Article 103589"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Development","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059326000994","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The medium of instruction plays a pivotal role in shaping students’ academic performance, engagement, and learning behavior—particularly in linguistically diverse contexts like India. This study investigates the pedagogical efficacy of bilingual (Hindi-English) versus monolingual (English-only) instruction in technical education, focusing on two core Computer Science subjects: Operating System Concepts and Object-Oriented Programming using C++. A quasi-experimental cross-over design was employed with undergraduate students, integrating pre-tests, four formative assessments, post-tests, structured feedback, and instructor observations. Quantitative results revealed that bilingual instruction led to significantly greater learning gains in abstract topics like Memory Management, as evidenced by paired t-tests and Mixed ANOVA. In contrast, programming concepts such as Constructors and Operator Overloading showed no significant post-test differences between the two modes, suggesting mode-neutral efficacy for syntax-driven content. Qualitative insights indicated enhanced clarity, emotional comfort, and active participation under bilingual instruction, particularly for students with limited English proficiency. Instructors observed improved in-class interaction and fewer post-class queries during bilingual sessions. This study fills a critical gap by offering empirical evidence on instructional language design in STEM education. It supports the development of a flexible bilingual teaching approach that improves student achievement and serves as a step toward expanding multilingual practices in higher education.
评价教学媒介对印度本科生技术学科学习成果的有效性:一项准实验交叉研究
教学媒介在塑造学生的学习成绩、参与度和学习行为方面起着关键作用,尤其是在印度这样的语言多样化的环境中。本研究调查了双语(印地语-英语)和单语(纯英语)教学在技术教育中的教学效果,重点关注两个核心计算机科学科目:操作系统概念和使用c++的面向对象程序设计。对本科生采用准实验交叉设计,整合前测、四次形成性评估、后测、结构化反馈和教师观察。配对t检验和混合方差分析结果显示,双语教学在记忆管理等抽象主题上的学习效果显著提高。相比之下,编程概念,如构造函数和操作符重载在两种模式之间没有显着的测试后差异,这表明模式中立对语法驱动的内容的有效性。定性分析表明,在双语教学下,尤其是英语水平有限的学生,清晰度、情绪舒适度和积极参与程度都有所提高。教师观察到,在双语课程中,课堂上的互动有所改善,课后的提问也减少了。本研究为STEM教育中的教学语言设计提供了经验证据,填补了这一关键空白。它支持开发灵活的双语教学方法,以提高学生的成绩,并作为在高等教育中扩大多语言实践的一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Educational Development
International Journal of Educational Development EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of the International Journal of Educational Development is to foster critical debate about the role that education plays in development. IJED seeks both to develop new theoretical insights into the education-development relationship and new understandings of the extent and nature of educational change in diverse settings. It stresses the importance of understanding the interplay of local, national, regional and global contexts and dynamics in shaping education and development. Orthodox notions of development as being about growth, industrialisation or poverty reduction are increasingly questioned. There are competing accounts that stress the human dimensions of development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书