Robotic Surgery for Bronchial Sleeve Lobectomy: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.

Chen Wang, Liyan Qiao, Yiming Xu, Xuyang Li, Lingdong Qiu
{"title":"Robotic Surgery for Bronchial Sleeve Lobectomy: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Chen Wang, Liyan Qiao, Yiming Xu, Xuyang Li, Lingdong Qiu","doi":"10.1002/rcs.70181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To investigate the effect of Robotic Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (RATS) in comparison to Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) and Open Thoracotomy (OP) in bronchial sleeve lobectomy (BSL) by Bayesian network meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After searching Pubmed, the Cochrane Library and Embase for research, 7 papers with 776 individuals with central non-small cell lung cancer that required BSL were found. Data for analysis entailed intraoperative outcomes, complications, and long-term survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The RATS group exhibited a shorter operation time, diminished intraoperative blood loss, and reduced postoperative drainage time without an elevation in the frequency of postoperative complications; in Additionally, the RATS group demonstrated an equivalent postoperative long-term survival rate when juxtaposed with the VATS and OP groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with VATS and OP in BSL, RATS has a better intraoperative application effect, less surgical impact and the same long-term survival rate. RATS has emerged as a viable and potentially favoured surgical approach for BSL.</p>","PeriodicalId":75029,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS","volume":"22 3","pages":"e70181"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.70181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To investigate the effect of Robotic Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (RATS) in comparison to Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) and Open Thoracotomy (OP) in bronchial sleeve lobectomy (BSL) by Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Methods: After searching Pubmed, the Cochrane Library and Embase for research, 7 papers with 776 individuals with central non-small cell lung cancer that required BSL were found. Data for analysis entailed intraoperative outcomes, complications, and long-term survival.

Results: The RATS group exhibited a shorter operation time, diminished intraoperative blood loss, and reduced postoperative drainage time without an elevation in the frequency of postoperative complications; in Additionally, the RATS group demonstrated an equivalent postoperative long-term survival rate when juxtaposed with the VATS and OP groups.

Conclusions: Compared with VATS and OP in BSL, RATS has a better intraoperative application effect, less surgical impact and the same long-term survival rate. RATS has emerged as a viable and potentially favoured surgical approach for BSL.

支气管袖状肺叶切除术的机器人手术:系统综述和贝叶斯网络meta分析。
背景:通过贝叶斯网络meta分析,探讨机器人辅助胸腔镜手术(RATS)与视频辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)和开胸手术(OP)在支气管袖状肺叶切除术(BSL)中的效果。方法:检索Pubmed、Cochrane Library、Embase等文献,共找到7篇需要行BSL治疗的中枢性非小细胞肺癌患者,共776例。用于分析的数据包括术中结果、并发症和长期生存。结果:大鼠组手术时间缩短,术中出血量减少,术后引流时间缩短,术后并发症发生率未升高;此外,与VATS和OP组相比,RATS组显示出相同的术后长期生存率。结论:与BSL的VATS和OP相比,RATS术中应用效果更好,手术影响更小,长期生存率相同。RATS已成为BSL的可行且潜在的手术入路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书