Association Between Racial Segregation of Labor and Delivery Services and Utilization of Trial of Labor and Vaginal Birth After Cesarean.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Obstetrics and gynecology Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-15 DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000006313
Max Jordan Nguemeni Tiako, Adebayo Adesomo, Jaewhan Kim, Michelle P Debbink
{"title":"Association Between Racial Segregation of Labor and Delivery Services and Utilization of Trial of Labor and Vaginal Birth After Cesarean.","authors":"Max Jordan Nguemeni Tiako, Adebayo Adesomo, Jaewhan Kim, Michelle P Debbink","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) offers an opportunity to mitigate maternal morbidity disparities, which are associated with cesarean delivery rates as well as with racial segregation in obstetric care. This study sought to assess the association between the proportion of births to Black individuals at a hospital and the likelihood of low-risk patients undergoing TOLAC and achieving vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study of 2017-2019 Nationwide Inpatient Sample deliveries with a history of prior cesarean delivery. We categorized hospitals by the proportion of births to Black individuals: high (top 5%), medium (6-25%), or low (reference), urban-rural status, and teaching status. Primary outcomes were TOLAC and VBAC odds. We used propensity score-matching and performed weighted hierarchical logistic regressions adjusting for maternal age, race and ethnicity, ZIP code median household income quartile, obstetric comorbidity index, hospital delivery volume, and bed size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,734,919 deliveries to low-risk individuals with prior cesarean deliveries were included. One-fifth of these patients (19.7%, n=341,165) attempted labor, among whom 81.4% (n=227,775) delivered vaginally. Compared with low Black-serving hospitals, patients at high Black-serving hospitals had higher TOLAC (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.51, 95% CI, 1.36-1.67) and VBAC odds (aOR 1.24, 95% CI, 1.07-1.43). Black (vs White) patients had lower VBAC odds (aOR 0.88, 95% CI, 0.78-0.98). Among urban teaching hospitals, the TOLAC and VBAC probabilities at high Black-serving hospitals were 25% (95% CI, 22-28%) and 75% (95% CI, 72-78%), respectively, compared with 18% (95% CI, 16-19%) and 70% (95% CI, 67-72%), respectively, at low Black-serving hospitals. Black patients at high Black-serving hospitals had a 72% (95% CI, 69-74%) VBAC probability compared with 67% (95% CI, 64-70%) at low Black-serving hospitals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Low-risk patients with prior cesarean deliveries had higher odds of TOLAC and VBAC at high Black-serving hospitals. Black (vs White) patients remained less likely to deliver vaginally but had higher chances at high Black-serving hospitals compared with low Black-serving hospitals. Future work should investigate institutional factors that may reduce cesarean deliveries and increase TOLAC and VBAC success, given the significant contribution of cesarean delivery to disparities in maternal morbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"516-524"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13467723/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000006313","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) offers an opportunity to mitigate maternal morbidity disparities, which are associated with cesarean delivery rates as well as with racial segregation in obstetric care. This study sought to assess the association between the proportion of births to Black individuals at a hospital and the likelihood of low-risk patients undergoing TOLAC and achieving vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC).

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of 2017-2019 Nationwide Inpatient Sample deliveries with a history of prior cesarean delivery. We categorized hospitals by the proportion of births to Black individuals: high (top 5%), medium (6-25%), or low (reference), urban-rural status, and teaching status. Primary outcomes were TOLAC and VBAC odds. We used propensity score-matching and performed weighted hierarchical logistic regressions adjusting for maternal age, race and ethnicity, ZIP code median household income quartile, obstetric comorbidity index, hospital delivery volume, and bed size.

Results: A total of 1,734,919 deliveries to low-risk individuals with prior cesarean deliveries were included. One-fifth of these patients (19.7%, n=341,165) attempted labor, among whom 81.4% (n=227,775) delivered vaginally. Compared with low Black-serving hospitals, patients at high Black-serving hospitals had higher TOLAC (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.51, 95% CI, 1.36-1.67) and VBAC odds (aOR 1.24, 95% CI, 1.07-1.43). Black (vs White) patients had lower VBAC odds (aOR 0.88, 95% CI, 0.78-0.98). Among urban teaching hospitals, the TOLAC and VBAC probabilities at high Black-serving hospitals were 25% (95% CI, 22-28%) and 75% (95% CI, 72-78%), respectively, compared with 18% (95% CI, 16-19%) and 70% (95% CI, 67-72%), respectively, at low Black-serving hospitals. Black patients at high Black-serving hospitals had a 72% (95% CI, 69-74%) VBAC probability compared with 67% (95% CI, 64-70%) at low Black-serving hospitals.

Conclusion: Low-risk patients with prior cesarean deliveries had higher odds of TOLAC and VBAC at high Black-serving hospitals. Black (vs White) patients remained less likely to deliver vaginally but had higher chances at high Black-serving hospitals compared with low Black-serving hospitals. Future work should investigate institutional factors that may reduce cesarean deliveries and increase TOLAC and VBAC success, given the significant contribution of cesarean delivery to disparities in maternal morbidity.

种族隔离分娩与分娩服务的关系及剖宫产后试产和顺产的利用。
目的:剖宫产后分娩试验(TOLAC)提供了一个机会,以减轻产妇发病率差异,这与剖宫产率和种族隔离产科护理。本研究旨在评估黑人在医院分娩的比例与低风险患者接受TOLAC和剖宫产后阴道分娩(VBAC)的可能性之间的关系。方法:对2017-2019年全国有剖宫产史的住院分娩患者进行回顾性队列研究。我们根据黑人出生比例对医院进行分类:高(前5%)、中(6-25%)或低(参考)、城乡状况和教学状况。主要结局为TOLAC和VBAC的赔率。我们采用倾向得分匹配,并对产妇年龄、种族和民族、邮政编码中位数家庭收入四分位数、产科合并症指数、医院产生量和床位大小进行加权分层logistic回归。结果:共纳入1,734,919例低风险患者,既往有剖宫产史。五分之一(19.7%,n=341,165)的患者尝试分娩,其中81.4% (n=227,775)的患者顺产。与低黑人服务医院相比,高黑人服务医院患者的TOLAC(调整优势比[aOR] 1.51, 95% CI, 1.36-1.67)和VBAC优势(aOR 1.24, 95% CI, 1.07-1.43)更高。黑人(与白人)患者的VBAC几率较低(aOR 0.88, 95% CI, 0.78-0.98)。在城市教学医院中,高黑人服务医院的TOLAC和VBAC概率分别为25% (95% CI, 22-28%)和75% (95% CI, 72-78%),而低黑人服务医院的TOLAC和VBAC概率分别为18% (95% CI, 16-19%)和70% (95% CI, 67-72%)。高黑人医院的黑人患者VBAC概率为72% (95% CI, 69-74%),而低黑人医院的黑人患者VBAC概率为67% (95% CI, 64-70%)。结论:低危剖宫产患者TOLAC和VBAC在高黑率医院发生率较高。黑人(相对于白人)患者仍然不太可能顺产,但在黑人比例高的医院比黑人比例低的医院有更高的机会。鉴于剖宫产对孕产妇发病率差异的重要贡献,未来的工作应调查可能减少剖宫产并增加TOLAC和VBAC成功率的制度因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Obstetrics and gynecology
Obstetrics and gynecology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
867
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: "Obstetrics & Gynecology," affectionately known as "The Green Journal," is the official publication of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Since its inception in 1953, the journal has been dedicated to advancing the clinical practice of obstetrics and gynecology, as well as related fields. The journal's mission is to promote excellence in these areas by publishing a diverse range of articles that cover translational and clinical topics. "Obstetrics & Gynecology" provides a platform for the dissemination of evidence-based research, clinical guidelines, and expert opinions that are essential for the continuous improvement of women's health care. The journal's content is designed to inform and educate obstetricians, gynecologists, and other healthcare professionals, ensuring that they stay abreast of the latest developments and best practices in their field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书