Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in clean elective upper limb soft-tissue surgery in a resource-limited setting: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Marcos Felipe Marcatto-Abreu, Pedro Henrique de Magalhães Tenório, Maurício Etchebehere
{"title":"Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in clean elective upper limb soft-tissue surgery in a resource-limited setting: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.","authors":"Marcos Felipe Marcatto-Abreu, Pedro Henrique de Magalhães Tenório, Maurício Etchebehere","doi":"10.1080/14787210.2026.2672549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Routine surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) is frequently used to prevent surgical site infections, although its benefit in clean elective upper limb soft-tissue surgery remains questionable due to the low baseline risk of infection. This issue is particularly relevant in resource-limited settings, where concerns about infection and limited locally generated evidence often sustain routine antibiotic use. This study evaluated whether SAP provides clinical benefit in this context using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. A total of 110 adult patients undergoing clean outpatient upper limb surgery were allocated to receive either a single preoperative dose of antibiotics or placebo. Surgical site infection rates were low and equivalent in both groups (1.8%), with no meaningful differences in postoperative wound complications. These findings suggest that routine SAP does not improve outcomes in this setting and support more judicious, evidence-based antibiotic use in low-risk surgical procedures, even in environments where perceived infection risk remains a concern.<b>Trial registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05990842.</p>","PeriodicalId":12213,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"465-473"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14787210.2026.2672549","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Routine surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) is frequently used to prevent surgical site infections, although its benefit in clean elective upper limb soft-tissue surgery remains questionable due to the low baseline risk of infection. This issue is particularly relevant in resource-limited settings, where concerns about infection and limited locally generated evidence often sustain routine antibiotic use. This study evaluated whether SAP provides clinical benefit in this context using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. A total of 110 adult patients undergoing clean outpatient upper limb surgery were allocated to receive either a single preoperative dose of antibiotics or placebo. Surgical site infection rates were low and equivalent in both groups (1.8%), with no meaningful differences in postoperative wound complications. These findings suggest that routine SAP does not improve outcomes in this setting and support more judicious, evidence-based antibiotic use in low-risk surgical procedures, even in environments where perceived infection risk remains a concern.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05990842.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Anti-Infective Therapy (ISSN 1478-7210) provides expert reviews on therapeutics and diagnostics in the treatment of infectious disease. Coverage includes antibiotics, drug resistance, drug therapy, infectious disease medicine, antibacterial, antimicrobial, antifungal and antiviral approaches, and diagnostic tests.