Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in clean elective upper limb soft-tissue surgery in a resource-limited setting: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Marcos Felipe Marcatto-Abreu, Pedro Henrique de Magalhães Tenório, Maurício Etchebehere
{"title":"Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in clean elective upper limb soft-tissue surgery in a resource-limited setting: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.","authors":"Marcos Felipe Marcatto-Abreu, Pedro Henrique de Magalhães Tenório, Maurício Etchebehere","doi":"10.1080/14787210.2026.2672549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Routine surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) is frequently used to prevent surgical site infections, although its benefit in clean elective upper limb soft-tissue surgery remains questionable due to the low baseline risk of infection. This issue is particularly relevant in resource-limited settings, where concerns about infection and limited locally generated evidence often sustain routine antibiotic use. This study evaluated whether SAP provides clinical benefit in this context using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. A total of 110 adult patients undergoing clean outpatient upper limb surgery were allocated to receive either a single preoperative dose of antibiotics or placebo. Surgical site infection rates were low and equivalent in both groups (1.8%), with no meaningful differences in postoperative wound complications. These findings suggest that routine SAP does not improve outcomes in this setting and support more judicious, evidence-based antibiotic use in low-risk surgical procedures, even in environments where perceived infection risk remains a concern.<b>Trial registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05990842.</p>","PeriodicalId":12213,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"465-473"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14787210.2026.2672549","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Routine surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) is frequently used to prevent surgical site infections, although its benefit in clean elective upper limb soft-tissue surgery remains questionable due to the low baseline risk of infection. This issue is particularly relevant in resource-limited settings, where concerns about infection and limited locally generated evidence often sustain routine antibiotic use. This study evaluated whether SAP provides clinical benefit in this context using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. A total of 110 adult patients undergoing clean outpatient upper limb surgery were allocated to receive either a single preoperative dose of antibiotics or placebo. Surgical site infection rates were low and equivalent in both groups (1.8%), with no meaningful differences in postoperative wound complications. These findings suggest that routine SAP does not improve outcomes in this setting and support more judicious, evidence-based antibiotic use in low-risk surgical procedures, even in environments where perceived infection risk remains a concern.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05990842.

在资源有限的情况下,清洁选择性上肢软组织手术中的外科抗生素预防:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验
常规外科抗生素预防(SAP)经常用于预防手术部位感染,尽管其在清洁择期上肢软组织手术中的益处仍然值得怀疑,因为感染的基线风险较低。这一问题在资源有限的环境中尤为重要,在这些环境中,对感染的担忧和当地产生的有限证据往往维持常规抗生素的使用。本研究采用随机、双盲、安慰剂对照设计评估SAP是否在这种情况下提供临床益处。共有110名接受清洁门诊上肢手术的成年患者被分配接受单剂量的术前抗生素或安慰剂。两组手术部位感染率低且相当(1.8%),术后伤口并发症无显著差异。这些发现表明,常规的SAP不能改善这种情况下的结果,并支持在低风险外科手术中更明智地、基于证据的抗生素使用,即使在感知感染风险仍然令人担忧的环境中也是如此。临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05990842。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Anti-Infective Therapy (ISSN 1478-7210) provides expert reviews on therapeutics and diagnostics in the treatment of infectious disease. Coverage includes antibiotics, drug resistance, drug therapy, infectious disease medicine, antibacterial, antimicrobial, antifungal and antiviral approaches, and diagnostic tests.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书