Renata Urban , Ramez Eskander , Shannon Westin , Matthew Powell , Amaranta Craig , Whitfield Growdon , Fernanda Musa , Marilyn Huang
{"title":"Endometrial cancer: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology evidence-based review and recommendations, part II","authors":"Renata Urban , Ramez Eskander , Shannon Westin , Matthew Powell , Amaranta Craig , Whitfield Growdon , Fernanda Musa , Marilyn Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.ygyno.2026.05.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>In the time since the last Clinical Practice Committee review of treatment of women with endometrial cancer in 2021, the field of gynecologic oncology has seen significant changes in endometrial cancer from understanding risk factors, addition of molecular staging, and expanded use of maintenance and targeted therapies. Despite these advances, the incidence of endometrial cancer as well as the deaths attributable to the disease continued to rise. Fortunately, since then, there has been progress in the treatment of patients with endometrial cancer, including increased utilization of molecular pathology, greater understanding of genetic predisposition, enhanced methods for lymph node assessment, a broader understanding of the efficacy of radiation and chemotherapy, and a more efficient approach to survivorship and surveillance. The purpose of this document is to present a comprehensive review of this progress. Manuscript development process: The authors reviewed the available evidence, contributed to the development of this manuscript, provided critical review of the guidelines, and finalized the manuscript recommendations. The review was also presented to and approved by the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) Clinical Practice Committee, Document Review Panel, and the Board of Directors prior to submission for publication. The recommendations for this manuscript were developed by a panel of gynecologic oncologists who were members of the SGO Clinical Practice Committee and subject matter experts. Panelists reviewed and considered evidence from current uterine cancer literature. The terminology used in these guidelines was adopted from the ASCCP management guidelines [1] using a two-part rating system to grade the strength of recommendation and quality of evidence. The rating for each recommendation is given in parentheses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12853,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic oncology","volume":"209 ","pages":"Pages 120-130"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090825826019803","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
In the time since the last Clinical Practice Committee review of treatment of women with endometrial cancer in 2021, the field of gynecologic oncology has seen significant changes in endometrial cancer from understanding risk factors, addition of molecular staging, and expanded use of maintenance and targeted therapies. Despite these advances, the incidence of endometrial cancer as well as the deaths attributable to the disease continued to rise. Fortunately, since then, there has been progress in the treatment of patients with endometrial cancer, including increased utilization of molecular pathology, greater understanding of genetic predisposition, enhanced methods for lymph node assessment, a broader understanding of the efficacy of radiation and chemotherapy, and a more efficient approach to survivorship and surveillance. The purpose of this document is to present a comprehensive review of this progress. Manuscript development process: The authors reviewed the available evidence, contributed to the development of this manuscript, provided critical review of the guidelines, and finalized the manuscript recommendations. The review was also presented to and approved by the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) Clinical Practice Committee, Document Review Panel, and the Board of Directors prior to submission for publication. The recommendations for this manuscript were developed by a panel of gynecologic oncologists who were members of the SGO Clinical Practice Committee and subject matter experts. Panelists reviewed and considered evidence from current uterine cancer literature. The terminology used in these guidelines was adopted from the ASCCP management guidelines [1] using a two-part rating system to grade the strength of recommendation and quality of evidence. The rating for each recommendation is given in parentheses.
导读:自临床实践委员会(Clinical Practice Committee)于2021年对女性子宫内膜癌的治疗进行审查以来,妇科肿瘤学领域从了解危险因素、增加分子分期、扩大维持和靶向治疗的使用,看到了子宫内膜癌的重大变化。尽管取得了这些进展,但子宫内膜癌的发病率以及该疾病导致的死亡人数继续上升。幸运的是,从那时起,子宫内膜癌患者的治疗取得了进展,包括分子病理学的应用增加,对遗传易感性的了解加深,淋巴结评估方法的改进,对放疗和化疗疗效的更广泛理解,以及更有效的生存和监测方法。本文件的目的是对这一进展进行全面审查。论文撰写过程:作者回顾了现有的证据,对论文的撰写做出了贡献,对指南进行了批判性的审查,并最终确定了论文的建议。在提交发表之前,该综述也提交给妇科肿瘤学会(SGO)临床实践委员会、文件审查小组和董事会并获得批准。这份手稿的建议是由一组妇科肿瘤学家制定的,他们是SGO临床实践委员会的成员和主题专家。小组成员回顾并考虑了当前子宫癌文献的证据。这些指南中使用的术语来自ASCCP管理指南[1],使用两部分评级系统对推荐的强度和证据质量进行评级。每个推荐的评级在括号中给出。
期刊介绍:
Gynecologic Oncology, an international journal, is devoted to the publication of clinical and investigative articles that concern tumors of the female reproductive tract. Investigations relating to the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of female cancers, as well as research from any of the disciplines related to this field of interest, are published.
Research Areas Include:
• Cell and molecular biology
• Chemotherapy
• Cytology
• Endocrinology
• Epidemiology
• Genetics
• Gynecologic surgery
• Immunology
• Pathology
• Radiotherapy