"Stuck" on the Ramp: What Factors Influence Patient Comfort and Satisfaction While Waiting on Emergency Department Ramps? A Qualitative Analysis.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Vicki Binnie, Robert Eley, Andrew Staib
{"title":"\"Stuck\" on the Ramp: What Factors Influence Patient Comfort and Satisfaction While Waiting on Emergency Department Ramps? A Qualitative Analysis.","authors":"Vicki Binnie, Robert Eley, Andrew Staib","doi":"10.1111/1742-6723.70265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Pressure on emergency departments is increasing, perpetuating the phenomenon known as ramping or ambulance ramping, where patients are forced to wait on stretchers in corridors until they are allocated a suitable treatment space. This once temporary response to emergency department crowding has now become the norm for many emergency departments. The ramping environment impacts the patient experience well beyond the undesirability of extended waiting times. Nevertheless, there remains little research regarding how patients experience the ramping environment and what might make their wait more comfortable.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were performed with patients who had waited at least an hour on the ramp at two Australian emergency departments. An inductive thematic analysis was undertaken to explore the patient experience while ramped and aspects of the built environment and care that participants perceived could better support their health and waiting experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six patients participated in the study. Four major themes and 13 subthemes were developed from the data. Participants described psychological distress, physical discomfort, an unsuitable built environment, and challenges to maintain physical health. They suggested modifications to the built environment and care received that may ameliorate some of their concerns.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ramping can create additional stresses to the patient experience. Making changes to the physical aspects of the built environment may be challenging in the short term; however, other aspects of the ramp were identified that could be considered to maximise patient-centred care.</p>","PeriodicalId":11604,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","volume":"38 3","pages":"e70265"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.70265","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Pressure on emergency departments is increasing, perpetuating the phenomenon known as ramping or ambulance ramping, where patients are forced to wait on stretchers in corridors until they are allocated a suitable treatment space. This once temporary response to emergency department crowding has now become the norm for many emergency departments. The ramping environment impacts the patient experience well beyond the undesirability of extended waiting times. Nevertheless, there remains little research regarding how patients experience the ramping environment and what might make their wait more comfortable.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were performed with patients who had waited at least an hour on the ramp at two Australian emergency departments. An inductive thematic analysis was undertaken to explore the patient experience while ramped and aspects of the built environment and care that participants perceived could better support their health and waiting experience.

Results: Twenty-six patients participated in the study. Four major themes and 13 subthemes were developed from the data. Participants described psychological distress, physical discomfort, an unsuitable built environment, and challenges to maintain physical health. They suggested modifications to the built environment and care received that may ameliorate some of their concerns.

Conclusion: Ramping can create additional stresses to the patient experience. Making changes to the physical aspects of the built environment may be challenging in the short term; however, other aspects of the ramp were identified that could be considered to maximise patient-centred care.

“卡”在斜坡上:什么因素影响病人在急诊科斜坡上等待时的舒适度和满意度?定性分析。
目的:急诊科的压力正在增加,这种现象被称为“斜坡”或“救护车斜坡”,病人被迫在走廊的担架上等待,直到他们被分配到合适的治疗空间。这种对急诊科拥挤的临时反应现在已成为许多急诊科的常态。斜坡环境对患者体验的影响远远超出了延长等待时间的不受欢迎。然而,关于患者如何体验斜坡环境以及如何使他们的等待更舒适的研究仍然很少。方法:对在两个澳大利亚急诊科的斜坡上等待至少一个小时的患者进行半结构化访谈。通过归纳性专题分析,探讨了患者在斜坡上的体验,以及参与者认为可以更好地支持他们的健康和等待体验的建筑环境和护理方面。结果:26例患者参与研究。根据数据制定了4个主要主题和13个次级主题。参与者描述了心理困扰、身体不适、不适宜的建筑环境以及保持身体健康的挑战。他们建议对建筑环境和所接受的护理进行修改,以改善他们的一些担忧。结论:斜坡会给患者带来额外的压力。在短期内,对建筑环境的物理方面作出改变可能是一项挑战;然而,坡道的其他方面被确定,可以考虑最大限度地以患者为中心的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Australasia
Emergency Medicine Australasia 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Emergency Medicine Australasia is the official journal of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) and the Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine (ASEM), and publishes original articles dealing with all aspects of clinical practice, research, education and experiences in emergency medicine. Original articles are published under the following sections: Original Research, Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Disaster Medicine, Education and Training, Ethics, International Emergency Medicine, Management and Quality, Medicolegal Matters, Prehospital Care, Public Health, Rural and Remote Care, Technology, Toxicology and Trauma. Accepted papers become the copyright of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书