Nita R Shah, Mathieu Oosterlaken, Claudine Bisson, Mattia Bertinelli, Alicia M Churchill-Angus, Andrew Hutchin, Jola Kopec, Vadim Kotov, Ciaran R McFarlane, Erika Griss Pascualli, Ana Pavic, Matthias Zebisch, Cédric Fiez-Vandal, Edoardo Fabini, Stéphanie Duclos
{"title":"A novel fusion tool to enable G protein-coupled receptor structure determination.","authors":"Nita R Shah, Mathieu Oosterlaken, Claudine Bisson, Mattia Bertinelli, Alicia M Churchill-Angus, Andrew Hutchin, Jola Kopec, Vadim Kotov, Ciaran R McFarlane, Erika Griss Pascualli, Ana Pavic, Matthias Zebisch, Cédric Fiez-Vandal, Edoardo Fabini, Stéphanie Duclos","doi":"10.1107/S2059798326003785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Structure determination of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) plays an important role in accelerating drug development against this medically important protein family. This study outlines the development of a new fusion tool to enable structure determination of GPCRs in inactive conformations by cryo-EM. Initially, a PDB mining approach was applied to select eight naturally occurring proteins with the intention of fusing them into the intracellular loop 3 (ICL3) of GPCRs to create a suitable fiducial marker for cryo-EM workflows. During the selection process, candidates with known high-affinity protein binders were prioritized to enable a further increase in the protein mass of the fiducial marker. Fusion constructs were generated with adenosine receptor A<sub>2A</sub> (A<sub>2A</sub>R) and were assessed for expression and aggregation levels. For the two best-performing new fusion constructs, ligand binding was characterized to ensure that the fusion tag did not significantly affect protein behaviour. A<sub>2A</sub>R with a β-lactamase fusion in ICL3 and binding partner β-lactamase inhibitory protein II (BLIPII) was then selected to solve an antagonist-bound structure. The overall map was resolved to an average of 3.2 Å resolution with continuous helices connecting the β-lactamase to helices 5 and 6 of A<sub>2A</sub>R. Focused refinement of the A<sub>2A</sub>R region improved the local resolution and map detail in the orthosteric site, thereby allowing confident modelling of the antagonist ligand, ZM241385, which matches previously described X-ray crystallographic structures. This new fusion provides an alternative option for GPCR structure determination, with several potential benefits compared with existing tools, such as a more favourable position relative to the GPCR to reduce potential clashes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7116,"journal":{"name":"Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Structural Biology","volume":" ","pages":"655-663"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13224925/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Structural Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1107/S2059798326003785","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Structure determination of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) plays an important role in accelerating drug development against this medically important protein family. This study outlines the development of a new fusion tool to enable structure determination of GPCRs in inactive conformations by cryo-EM. Initially, a PDB mining approach was applied to select eight naturally occurring proteins with the intention of fusing them into the intracellular loop 3 (ICL3) of GPCRs to create a suitable fiducial marker for cryo-EM workflows. During the selection process, candidates with known high-affinity protein binders were prioritized to enable a further increase in the protein mass of the fiducial marker. Fusion constructs were generated with adenosine receptor A2A (A2AR) and were assessed for expression and aggregation levels. For the two best-performing new fusion constructs, ligand binding was characterized to ensure that the fusion tag did not significantly affect protein behaviour. A2AR with a β-lactamase fusion in ICL3 and binding partner β-lactamase inhibitory protein II (BLIPII) was then selected to solve an antagonist-bound structure. The overall map was resolved to an average of 3.2 Å resolution with continuous helices connecting the β-lactamase to helices 5 and 6 of A2AR. Focused refinement of the A2AR region improved the local resolution and map detail in the orthosteric site, thereby allowing confident modelling of the antagonist ligand, ZM241385, which matches previously described X-ray crystallographic structures. This new fusion provides an alternative option for GPCR structure determination, with several potential benefits compared with existing tools, such as a more favourable position relative to the GPCR to reduce potential clashes.
期刊介绍:
Acta Crystallographica Section D welcomes the submission of articles covering any aspect of structural biology, with a particular emphasis on the structures of biological macromolecules or the methods used to determine them.
Reports on new structures of biological importance may address the smallest macromolecules to the largest complex molecular machines. These structures may have been determined using any structural biology technique including crystallography, NMR, cryoEM and/or other techniques. The key criterion is that such articles must present significant new insights into biological, chemical or medical sciences. The inclusion of complementary data that support the conclusions drawn from the structural studies (such as binding studies, mass spectrometry, enzyme assays, or analysis of mutants or other modified forms of biological macromolecule) is encouraged.
Methods articles may include new approaches to any aspect of biological structure determination or structure analysis but will only be accepted where they focus on new methods that are demonstrated to be of general applicability and importance to structural biology. Articles describing particularly difficult problems in structural biology are also welcomed, if the analysis would provide useful insights to others facing similar problems.