Trace T Palmer, Cindy M Moore, Kelsey L Bounds-Wood, William Bryant, Alexandra Rose, Oishika Paul, Christopher Spankovich, Gina D Jefferson
{"title":"Comparison of Adult Tracheostomy Outcomes Before and After Implementation of a Dedicated Tracheostomy Team.","authors":"Trace T Palmer, Cindy M Moore, Kelsey L Bounds-Wood, William Bryant, Alexandra Rose, Oishika Paul, Christopher Spankovich, Gina D Jefferson","doi":"10.1177/00034894261450132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>(A) Determine patient and institutional factors associated with increased length of stay (LOS) and complications of tracheostomy, (B) Develop data-driven quality improvement in tracheostomy care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Mixed methods protocol used cross-sectional survey assessing institutional trends in tracheostomy-specific care. Retrospective chart review compared tracheostomy patient outcomes prior to and during implementation of a multidisciplinary tracheostomy care team and standardized guidelines.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients undergoing tracheostomy from January 2019 to December 2021 at a tertiary hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient factors, procedure type and indication, tracheostomy tube size, management timeline, insurance, and disease severity using Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score were analyzed for associations with LOS and adverse events. Multivariate analyses controlled for APACHE II score and payer source. LOS and complications were compared between patients before and during implementation of multidisciplinary tracheostomy care team and standardized guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three-hundred and eighteen patients met criteria with a 21.7% complication rate, average LOS of 24 days (SD = 28.523), and median LOS post-tracheostomy of 14 days (IQR 7, 29). Departments without standardized protocols had greater LOS (<i>F</i>[1,316] = 28.706, <i>P</i> < .001]) and complication odds (OR = 2.92, <i>P</i> = .015, 95% CI[1.231, 6.930]). Larger tracheostomy tube size was linked to increased LOS (β = .253, <i>t</i>(314) = 4.741, <i>P</i> < .001, 95% CI[4.137, 10.081]). Delays from ventilation discontinuation to cuffless tube exchange and decannulation correlated with increased LOS (β = .406, <i>t</i>(184) = 6.321, <i>P</i> < .001, 95% CI[.928, 1.771]); (β = .554, <i>t</i>(129) = 7.625, <i>P</i> < .001, 95% CI[1.008, 1.715]). When focusing on a single department, comparing 2019 patients to 2021 patients (pre- and post-guideline and care team), overall, LOS decreased from 33.08 to 30.83 days (<i>P</i> = .586). When excluding patients discharged on a ventilator, the 2019 group had average LOS of 37.938 days versus 33.41 days in 2021 (<i>P</i> = .344).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Standardized tracheostomy care guidelines and multidisciplinary care teams are critical to improving institutional outcomes. Data-driven approaches to quality improvement ensure efficient and targeted methods to improving patient care.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>4.</p>","PeriodicalId":520787,"journal":{"name":"The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology","volume":" ","pages":"752-759"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894261450132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: (A) Determine patient and institutional factors associated with increased length of stay (LOS) and complications of tracheostomy, (B) Develop data-driven quality improvement in tracheostomy care.
Design: Mixed methods protocol used cross-sectional survey assessing institutional trends in tracheostomy-specific care. Retrospective chart review compared tracheostomy patient outcomes prior to and during implementation of a multidisciplinary tracheostomy care team and standardized guidelines.
Participants: Patients undergoing tracheostomy from January 2019 to December 2021 at a tertiary hospital.
Methods: Patient factors, procedure type and indication, tracheostomy tube size, management timeline, insurance, and disease severity using Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score were analyzed for associations with LOS and adverse events. Multivariate analyses controlled for APACHE II score and payer source. LOS and complications were compared between patients before and during implementation of multidisciplinary tracheostomy care team and standardized guidelines.
Results: Three-hundred and eighteen patients met criteria with a 21.7% complication rate, average LOS of 24 days (SD = 28.523), and median LOS post-tracheostomy of 14 days (IQR 7, 29). Departments without standardized protocols had greater LOS (F[1,316] = 28.706, P < .001]) and complication odds (OR = 2.92, P = .015, 95% CI[1.231, 6.930]). Larger tracheostomy tube size was linked to increased LOS (β = .253, t(314) = 4.741, P < .001, 95% CI[4.137, 10.081]). Delays from ventilation discontinuation to cuffless tube exchange and decannulation correlated with increased LOS (β = .406, t(184) = 6.321, P < .001, 95% CI[.928, 1.771]); (β = .554, t(129) = 7.625, P < .001, 95% CI[1.008, 1.715]). When focusing on a single department, comparing 2019 patients to 2021 patients (pre- and post-guideline and care team), overall, LOS decreased from 33.08 to 30.83 days (P = .586). When excluding patients discharged on a ventilator, the 2019 group had average LOS of 37.938 days versus 33.41 days in 2021 (P = .344).
Conclusions: Standardized tracheostomy care guidelines and multidisciplinary care teams are critical to improving institutional outcomes. Data-driven approaches to quality improvement ensure efficient and targeted methods to improving patient care.
目的:(A)确定与气管造口术住院时间(LOS)和并发症增加相关的患者和机构因素;(B)开发数据驱动的气管造口术护理质量改进。设计:采用混合方法的横断面调查方案,评估气管切开术特异性护理的机构趋势。回顾性图表回顾比较了气管切开术患者在实施多学科气管切开术护理团队和标准化指南之前和期间的结果。对象:2019年1月至2021年12月在某三级医院行气管切开术的患者。方法:采用急性生理和慢性健康评估II (APACHE II)评分分析患者因素、手术类型和适应症、气管造口管大小、治疗时间、保险和疾病严重程度与LOS和不良事件的关系。多变量分析控制了APACHE II评分和付款人来源。比较多学科气管切开术前后患者的LOS和并发症。结果:318例患者符合标准,并发症发生率为21.7%,平均LOS为24天(SD = 28.523),气管切开后中位LOS为14天(IQR 7,29)。未采用标准化治疗方案的科室LOS较高(F[1,316] = 28.706, P P =。0.15, 95% ci[1.231, 6.930])。较大的气管造口管尺寸与LOS增加有关(β =。253年,t (314) = 4.741, P t (184) = 6.321, P t (129) = 7.625, P P = .586)。当排除使用呼吸机出院的患者时,2019年组的平均生存时间为37.938天,而2021年组为33.41天(P = 0.344)。结论:标准化的气管切开术护理指南和多学科护理团队对改善机构结果至关重要。数据驱动的质量改进方法确保了有效和有针对性的方法来改善患者护理。证据等级:4。