Mahima Bhardwaj, Shweta Prasad, Keshav J Kumar, Tarunya Nagaraj, Shubha G S Bhat, Pooja Mailankody, Rohan R Mahale, Vikram V Holla, Nitish Kamble, Ravi Yadav, Pramod Kumar Pal
{"title":"Visual memory in Parkinson's Disease: a non-graphomotor approach to assessment.","authors":"Mahima Bhardwaj, Shweta Prasad, Keshav J Kumar, Tarunya Nagaraj, Shubha G S Bhat, Pooja Mailankody, Rohan R Mahale, Vikram V Holla, Nitish Kamble, Ravi Yadav, Pramod Kumar Pal","doi":"10.1007/s00702-026-03181-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive motor disorder with multiple motor and non-motor symptoms. Cognitive decline, particularly memory deficits are well documented phenomenon due to its importance as potential biomarkers. While substantial research has explained mechanisms and findings related to deficits in verbal learning and memory, deficits across visual learning and memory are comparatively under-documented. They are often inconsistent due to the reliance on traditional paper-pencil based tests which are susceptible to confounding by motor symptoms and graphomotor deterioration seen in PD. This study aims to explore the usefulness of the Wechsler Memory Scale-IV (WMS-IV) as a non-graphomotor method to testing visual memory profiles in PD. Performance on subtests of the WMS-IV was compared between 113 patients with PD and 90 education-matched healthy controls (HC) with stratification based on literacy into literate, functional illiterate and illiterate. Significant differences were observed on sub-tests of Symbol Span and Designs I(Content) scores between the PD groups and their corresponding HC irrespective of education level. Only the literate PD group showed significant differences from their HC on spatial addition subtests. On the Designs I and II spatial scores, functional illiterates, did not differ from their corresponding HC while the literate and illiterate Groups continued to differ. These findings highlight the need to adapt traditional visual learning and memory tests to PD in order to elicit truly representative deficits, and the need to develop alternative versions that are not driven by education with localised education-based norms. These will permit accurate and equitable profiling across literacy backgrounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":520679,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)","volume":" ","pages":"2513-2520"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-026-03181-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive motor disorder with multiple motor and non-motor symptoms. Cognitive decline, particularly memory deficits are well documented phenomenon due to its importance as potential biomarkers. While substantial research has explained mechanisms and findings related to deficits in verbal learning and memory, deficits across visual learning and memory are comparatively under-documented. They are often inconsistent due to the reliance on traditional paper-pencil based tests which are susceptible to confounding by motor symptoms and graphomotor deterioration seen in PD. This study aims to explore the usefulness of the Wechsler Memory Scale-IV (WMS-IV) as a non-graphomotor method to testing visual memory profiles in PD. Performance on subtests of the WMS-IV was compared between 113 patients with PD and 90 education-matched healthy controls (HC) with stratification based on literacy into literate, functional illiterate and illiterate. Significant differences were observed on sub-tests of Symbol Span and Designs I(Content) scores between the PD groups and their corresponding HC irrespective of education level. Only the literate PD group showed significant differences from their HC on spatial addition subtests. On the Designs I and II spatial scores, functional illiterates, did not differ from their corresponding HC while the literate and illiterate Groups continued to differ. These findings highlight the need to adapt traditional visual learning and memory tests to PD in order to elicit truly representative deficits, and the need to develop alternative versions that are not driven by education with localised education-based norms. These will permit accurate and equitable profiling across literacy backgrounds.
帕金森病(PD)是一种进行性运动障碍,具有多种运动和非运动症状。认知能力下降,特别是记忆缺陷作为潜在生物标志物的重要性,是一种有充分记录的现象。虽然大量的研究已经解释了与语言学习和记忆缺陷相关的机制和发现,但视觉学习和记忆的缺陷相对较少。由于依赖传统的基于纸笔的测试,这些测试容易被运动症状和PD中所见的书写运动恶化所混淆,因此它们往往不一致。本研究旨在探讨韦氏记忆量表- iv (WMS-IV)作为一种非书写运动方法测试PD患者视觉记忆的有效性。将113名PD患者与90名教育匹配健康对照者(HC)在WMS-IV亚测试中的表现进行比较,并根据读写能力分层为识字、功能文盲和文盲。PD组与相应的HC在符号广度和设计I(内容)的子测试得分上存在显著差异,而不受教育水平的影响。只有识字PD组在空间加法测试上与HC组有显著差异。在设计I和II的空间得分上,功能性文盲与其相应的HC没有差异,而识字组和文盲组继续存在差异。这些发现强调了将传统的视觉学习和记忆测试应用于帕金森病的必要性,以引出真正具有代表性的缺陷,并需要开发不受教育驱动的替代版本,采用基于当地教育的规范。这将允许准确和公平地分析不同的文化背景。