Comparison of multimodal analgesia including intermediate cervical plexus block versus local infiltration analgesia after carotid endarterectomy: a randomized observer-blinded trial.

IF 3.6
Anesthesia and pain medicine Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-11 DOI:10.17085/apm.25380
Jisun Choi, Yang-Jin Park, RyungA Kang, Shin-Seok Yang, Yu Jeong Bang, Ji-Hye Kwon, Woo Seog Sim, Duk Kyung Kim, Jong Hwan Lee, Justin Sangwook Ko
{"title":"Comparison of multimodal analgesia including intermediate cervical plexus block versus local infiltration analgesia after carotid endarterectomy: a randomized observer-blinded trial.","authors":"Jisun Choi, Yang-Jin Park, RyungA Kang, Shin-Seok Yang, Yu Jeong Bang, Ji-Hye Kwon, Woo Seog Sim, Duk Kyung Kim, Jong Hwan Lee, Justin Sangwook Ko","doi":"10.17085/apm.25380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective perioperative analgesia is essential to prevent abrupt changes in cerebral blood flow following carotid endarterectomy (CEA). We aimed to evaluate whether multimodal analgesia, including intermediate cervical plexus block (CPB), reduces 24 h postoperative opioid consumption compared with local infiltration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized, observer-blinded study included 40 patients undergoing CEA. Patients were randomly allocated to either the multimodal group (multimodal analgesia with intermediate CPB, n = 20) or the control group (local infiltration, n = 20). The primary outcome was 24 h intravenous (IV) opioid conversion to IV morphine equivalents. Secondary outcomes included pain scores at rest and during motion, time to first opioid use, hypertension incidence, antihypertensive use, postoperative nausea/vomiting, satisfaction with pain management, quality of first-night sleep, Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15K) scores, complications, cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome, and intraoperative analgesia nociception index values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the intention-to-treat analysis, 24 h postoperative opioid consumption was 13.3 (6.7, 20.0) mg and 10.0 (6.7, 13.3) mg in the control and multimodal groups, respectively, with no significant difference (P = 0.191). The multimodal group had significantly lower immediate postoperative pain at rest (P < 0.001) and during movement (P < 0.001), as well as longer time to first opioid use (P = 0.047) and higher QoR-15K scores (P = 0.004). No significant differences were observed in the other parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multimodal analgesia with intermediate CPB did not reduce 24 h opioid consumption after CEA. However, it was associated with better early postoperative pain control and recovery scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":101360,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":"21 2","pages":"242-251"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13175900/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.25380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Effective perioperative analgesia is essential to prevent abrupt changes in cerebral blood flow following carotid endarterectomy (CEA). We aimed to evaluate whether multimodal analgesia, including intermediate cervical plexus block (CPB), reduces 24 h postoperative opioid consumption compared with local infiltration.

Methods: This randomized, observer-blinded study included 40 patients undergoing CEA. Patients were randomly allocated to either the multimodal group (multimodal analgesia with intermediate CPB, n = 20) or the control group (local infiltration, n = 20). The primary outcome was 24 h intravenous (IV) opioid conversion to IV morphine equivalents. Secondary outcomes included pain scores at rest and during motion, time to first opioid use, hypertension incidence, antihypertensive use, postoperative nausea/vomiting, satisfaction with pain management, quality of first-night sleep, Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15K) scores, complications, cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome, and intraoperative analgesia nociception index values.

Results: In the intention-to-treat analysis, 24 h postoperative opioid consumption was 13.3 (6.7, 20.0) mg and 10.0 (6.7, 13.3) mg in the control and multimodal groups, respectively, with no significant difference (P = 0.191). The multimodal group had significantly lower immediate postoperative pain at rest (P < 0.001) and during movement (P < 0.001), as well as longer time to first opioid use (P = 0.047) and higher QoR-15K scores (P = 0.004). No significant differences were observed in the other parameters.

Conclusions: Multimodal analgesia with intermediate CPB did not reduce 24 h opioid consumption after CEA. However, it was associated with better early postoperative pain control and recovery scores.

颈动脉内膜切除术后多模式镇痛包括中间颈丛阻滞与局部浸润镇痛的比较:一项随机观察-盲法试验。
背景:有效的围手术期镇痛对于预防颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后脑血流的突然变化至关重要。我们的目的是评估多模式镇痛,包括中间颈丛阻滞(CPB),是否减少术后24小时阿片类药物的消耗与局部浸润。方法:这项随机、观察盲法研究纳入了40例CEA患者。患者被随机分配到多模态组(多模态镇痛加中间CPB, n = 20)和对照组(局部浸润,n = 20)。主要结局是24小时静脉(IV)阿片类药物转化为IV吗啡当量。次要结局包括休息和运动时疼痛评分、首次使用阿片类药物的时间、高血压发病率、抗高血压药物的使用、术后恶心/呕吐、疼痛管理满意度、首夜睡眠质量、韩国版恢复质量-15 (QoR-15K)评分、并发症、脑高灌注综合征和术中镇痛痛觉指数值。结果:意向治疗分析中,对照组和多模态组术后24 h阿片类药物消耗分别为13.3 (6.7,20.0)mg和10.0 (6.7,13.3)mg,差异无统计学意义(P = 0.191)。多模式组术后即刻休息疼痛(P < 0.001)和运动疼痛(P < 0.001)明显降低,首次使用阿片类药物的时间较长(P = 0.047), QoR-15K评分较高(P = 0.004)。其他参数无显著差异。结论:中间CPB多模式镇痛不能减少CEA术后24 h阿片类药物的消耗。然而,它与更好的术后早期疼痛控制和恢复评分相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书