Current recommendations for preventing residual neuromuscular blockade.

IF 3.6
Anesthesia and pain medicine Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-29 DOI:10.17085/apm.26556
Jeong Eun Lee, Hoon Jung
{"title":"Current recommendations for preventing residual neuromuscular blockade.","authors":"Jeong Eun Lee, Hoon Jung","doi":"10.17085/apm.26556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) offers several advantages during surgery under general anesthesia because they help secure the surgical field and facilitate appropriate mechanical ventilation. Eliminating postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade (rNMB) remains a major challenge for anesthesiologists. Despite the use of intermediate-acting NMBAs and sugammadex, the incidence of rNMB still remains close to 50%. Although it is relatively easy to distinguish rNMB from a serious adverse reaction in healthy patients in the postanesthesia care unit, the effects of anesthesia make it much more difficult to rule out rNMB in critically ill patients. Although there were no comprehensive guidelines for NMBA management for decades, the most crucial step is now no longer the assessment of blockade depth based on subjective clinical tests or qualitative neuromuscular monitoring (NMM), but rather the appropriate use of NMBAs and reversal agents, and extubation guided by objective, quantitative monitoring. Accordingly, the American Society of Anesthesiologists, the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care have published practical guidelines for preventing rNMB over the past five years, recommending appropriate use of NMBAs and reversal agents and the incorporation of quantitative NMM as standard monitoring whenever NMBAs are used. Furthermore, with recent advances in electromyography and the increasing availability of NMM, education on its proper use is essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":101360,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":"21 2","pages":"162-170"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13175903/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.26556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) offers several advantages during surgery under general anesthesia because they help secure the surgical field and facilitate appropriate mechanical ventilation. Eliminating postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade (rNMB) remains a major challenge for anesthesiologists. Despite the use of intermediate-acting NMBAs and sugammadex, the incidence of rNMB still remains close to 50%. Although it is relatively easy to distinguish rNMB from a serious adverse reaction in healthy patients in the postanesthesia care unit, the effects of anesthesia make it much more difficult to rule out rNMB in critically ill patients. Although there were no comprehensive guidelines for NMBA management for decades, the most crucial step is now no longer the assessment of blockade depth based on subjective clinical tests or qualitative neuromuscular monitoring (NMM), but rather the appropriate use of NMBAs and reversal agents, and extubation guided by objective, quantitative monitoring. Accordingly, the American Society of Anesthesiologists, the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care have published practical guidelines for preventing rNMB over the past five years, recommending appropriate use of NMBAs and reversal agents and the incorporation of quantitative NMM as standard monitoring whenever NMBAs are used. Furthermore, with recent advances in electromyography and the increasing availability of NMM, education on its proper use is essential.

目前关于预防残余神经肌肉阻滞的建议。
在全麻手术中使用神经肌肉阻断剂(nmba)有几个优点,因为它们有助于保护手术野并促进适当的机械通气。消除术后残留的神经肌肉阻滞(rNMB)仍然是麻醉师面临的主要挑战。尽管使用了中间作用的nmba和sugammadex,但rNMB的发生率仍然接近50%。尽管在麻醉后护理病房中,将健康患者的rmb与严重不良反应区分开来相对容易,但麻醉的影响使得在危重患者中排除rmb的难度要大得多。虽然几十年来没有关于NMBA管理的综合指南,但现在最关键的一步不再是基于主观临床试验或定性神经肌肉监测(NMM)的阻断深度评估,而是适当使用NMBA和逆转剂,以及在客观定量监测指导下拔管。因此,美国麻醉医师学会、欧洲麻醉与重症监护学会在过去五年中发布了预防人民币脑卒中的实用指南,建议适当使用NMBAs和逆转剂,并在使用NMBAs时将定量NMM纳入标准监测。此外,随着肌电图的最新进展和NMM的日益普及,对其正确使用的教育是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书