Driving pressure guided ventilation in robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery with steep Trendelenburg position: a randomized controlled study.

IF 3.6
Anesthesia and pain medicine Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-09 DOI:10.17085/apm.25337
Sooah Cho, Bo Rim Kim, Sang-Youn Park, Soo-Hyuk Yoon, Jae-Hyon Bahk, Susie Yoon
{"title":"Driving pressure guided ventilation in robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery with steep Trendelenburg position: a randomized controlled study.","authors":"Sooah Cho, Bo Rim Kim, Sang-Youn Park, Soo-Hyuk Yoon, Jae-Hyon Bahk, Susie Yoon","doi":"10.17085/apm.25337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) with pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg positioning impairs ventilation and increases the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). Although positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may reduce atelectasis, the optimal levels remain unclear. This study evaluated the effects of driving pressure (DP)-guided PEEP titration during RALP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, randomized controlled trial enrolled adults undergoing RALP (American Society of Anesthesiologists < 3, without pulmonary disease) for either DP minimization-guided individualized PEEP (DP group) or fixed 5 cmH2O PEEP (control). DP was calculated as plateau pressure minus PEEP, with individualized PEEP determined using decremental titration. Atelectasis was quantified using modified lung ultrasound (LUS) score, incorporating B-lines and consolidations. Primary outcome was LUS score at end-Trendelenburg. Secondary outcomes included oxygenation and PPCs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 101 assessed, 63 completed analysis. The DP group (n=31) received higher individualized PEEP (median 8.0 cmH2O) during Trendelenburg than controls (5.0 cmH2O, n=32). In the DP group, mean DP was lower during Trendelenburg (19.0 ± 3.4 vs. 21.3 ± 4.7 cmH2O, P=0.035) and LUS score was significantly lower at the end-Trendelenburg (median [1Q, 3Q]: 9.0 [8.0, 11.5] vs. 11.0 [9.0, 13.0]; median difference, -2.0 [95% CI, -3.0 to 0.0]; P=0.032) and recovery (9.0 vs. 13.5, P<0.001). Intraoperative PaO2 during Trendelenburg was higher in the DP group (154.6 ± 33.1 vs. 133.3 ± 34.7 mmHg, P=0.015). PPCs and hospital stay were comparable between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DP-guided PEEP titration during RALP reduced lung de-aeration burden assessed by modified LUS score, though benefits did not translate to reduced PPCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":101360,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":"21 2","pages":"223-234"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13175901/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.25337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) with pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg positioning impairs ventilation and increases the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). Although positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may reduce atelectasis, the optimal levels remain unclear. This study evaluated the effects of driving pressure (DP)-guided PEEP titration during RALP.

Methods: This single-center, randomized controlled trial enrolled adults undergoing RALP (American Society of Anesthesiologists < 3, without pulmonary disease) for either DP minimization-guided individualized PEEP (DP group) or fixed 5 cmH2O PEEP (control). DP was calculated as plateau pressure minus PEEP, with individualized PEEP determined using decremental titration. Atelectasis was quantified using modified lung ultrasound (LUS) score, incorporating B-lines and consolidations. Primary outcome was LUS score at end-Trendelenburg. Secondary outcomes included oxygenation and PPCs.

Results: Of 101 assessed, 63 completed analysis. The DP group (n=31) received higher individualized PEEP (median 8.0 cmH2O) during Trendelenburg than controls (5.0 cmH2O, n=32). In the DP group, mean DP was lower during Trendelenburg (19.0 ± 3.4 vs. 21.3 ± 4.7 cmH2O, P=0.035) and LUS score was significantly lower at the end-Trendelenburg (median [1Q, 3Q]: 9.0 [8.0, 11.5] vs. 11.0 [9.0, 13.0]; median difference, -2.0 [95% CI, -3.0 to 0.0]; P=0.032) and recovery (9.0 vs. 13.5, P<0.001). Intraoperative PaO2 during Trendelenburg was higher in the DP group (154.6 ± 33.1 vs. 133.3 ± 34.7 mmHg, P=0.015). PPCs and hospital stay were comparable between groups.

Conclusions: DP-guided PEEP titration during RALP reduced lung de-aeration burden assessed by modified LUS score, though benefits did not translate to reduced PPCs.

驱动压力引导通气在机器人辅助腹腔镜手术陡Trendelenburg位:一项随机对照研究。
背景:机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术(RALP)与气腹和陡峭的Trendelenburg定位损害通气和增加术后肺部并发症(PPCs)的风险。虽然正呼气末压(PEEP)可以减少肺不张,但最佳水平仍不清楚。本研究评估了在RALP期间驱动压力(DP)引导PEEP滴定的效果。方法:这项单中心、随机对照试验招募了接受RALP(美国麻醉医师学会< 3岁,无肺部疾病)的成人,分别进行DP最小化指导的个体化PEEP (DP组)或固定5cmh2o PEEP(对照组)。DP用平台压减去PEEP计算,个体化PEEP用递减滴定法测定。采用改良肺超声(LUS)评分,结合b线和实变,量化肺不张。主要终点为trendelenburg末期的LUS评分。次要结局包括氧合和PPCs。结果:101例评估中,63例完成分析。DP组(n=31)在Trendelenburg期间的个体化PEEP(中位数8.0 cmH2O)高于对照组(5.0 cmH2O, n=32)。在DP组中,Trendelenburg期间的平均DP较低(19.0±3.4比21.3±4.7 cmH2O, P=0.035), Trendelenburg末期的LUS评分显著较低(中位数[1Q, 3Q]: 9.0[8.0, 11.5]比11.0[9.0,13.0];中位数差异为-2.0 [95% CI, -3.0至0.0];P=0.032)和恢复(9.0比13.5,P)结论:RALP期间DP引导的PEEP滴定降低了经改良LUS评分评估的肺通气负担,尽管益处并未转化为PPCs的降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书