Empagliflozin as an Alternative to Metformin for Antipsychotic-Related Weight Gain: Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 1.7
Atena Dolati, Davoud Ahmadimoghaddam, Maryam Zamanirafe, Shabnam Rezaie, Salman Khazaie, Maryam Mehrpooya, Mona Doostizadeh
{"title":"Empagliflozin as an Alternative to Metformin for Antipsychotic-Related Weight Gain: Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Atena Dolati, Davoud Ahmadimoghaddam, Maryam Zamanirafe, Shabnam Rezaie, Salman Khazaie, Maryam Mehrpooya, Mona Doostizadeh","doi":"10.1002/hup.70047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Weight gain and metabolic disturbances are common adverse effects of antipsychotic medications such as clozapine and olanzapine. Beyond their primary role in glycemic control, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have been associated with weight loss and improvements in various metabolic parameters. This study compared the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin and metformin in patients with antipsychotic-induced weight gain (AIWG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this 12-week, double-blind, randomized controlled trial, 84 adults with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder and established weight gain from clozapine or olanzapine were assigned to receive either empagliflozin (10 mg daily) or metformin (1000 mg daily). The primary outcome was the percentage change in body weight from baseline to week 12. Secondary outcomes included changes in absolute body weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, waist-hip ratio, and the proportion of patients achieving ≥ 5% weight loss. Exploratory outcomes assessed changes in glycemic and lipid parameters, fasting insulin, and insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Safety was evaluated by monitoring adverse events, treatment discontinuations, and serious adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 84 randomized participants, 38 (90.5%) in the empagliflozin group and 39 (92.9%) in the metformin group completed the 12-week study. Both treatments produced significant within-group reductions in anthropometric measures (all p < 0.001) and there were no statistically significant differences between groups in the magnitude of change for body weight, BMI, waist circumference, hip circumference, or waist-hip ratio (all p > 0.05). Both groups showed improvements in glycemic and lipid parameters, but empagliflozin resulted in significantly greater reductions in TG (p = 0.004), fasting insulin (p = 0.005), and HOMA-IR (p = 0.012), as well as a greater increase in HDL-C (p < 0.001) compared to metformin. The overall incidence of adverse effects was comparable (33.3% vs. 38.1%; p = 0.650), with no serious adverse events reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that empagliflozin is a promising alternative to metformin for managing metabolic complications in patients treated with clozapine or olanzapine. These findings warrant confirmation and further investigation in larger, long-term studies.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The trial was registered prospectively at the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) with the ID code IRCT20120215009014N538 on November 12, 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":520641,"journal":{"name":"Human psychopharmacology","volume":"41 3","pages":"e70047"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hup.70047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Weight gain and metabolic disturbances are common adverse effects of antipsychotic medications such as clozapine and olanzapine. Beyond their primary role in glycemic control, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have been associated with weight loss and improvements in various metabolic parameters. This study compared the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin and metformin in patients with antipsychotic-induced weight gain (AIWG).

Methods: In this 12-week, double-blind, randomized controlled trial, 84 adults with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder and established weight gain from clozapine or olanzapine were assigned to receive either empagliflozin (10 mg daily) or metformin (1000 mg daily). The primary outcome was the percentage change in body weight from baseline to week 12. Secondary outcomes included changes in absolute body weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, waist-hip ratio, and the proportion of patients achieving ≥ 5% weight loss. Exploratory outcomes assessed changes in glycemic and lipid parameters, fasting insulin, and insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Safety was evaluated by monitoring adverse events, treatment discontinuations, and serious adverse events.

Results: Of the 84 randomized participants, 38 (90.5%) in the empagliflozin group and 39 (92.9%) in the metformin group completed the 12-week study. Both treatments produced significant within-group reductions in anthropometric measures (all p < 0.001) and there were no statistically significant differences between groups in the magnitude of change for body weight, BMI, waist circumference, hip circumference, or waist-hip ratio (all p > 0.05). Both groups showed improvements in glycemic and lipid parameters, but empagliflozin resulted in significantly greater reductions in TG (p = 0.004), fasting insulin (p = 0.005), and HOMA-IR (p = 0.012), as well as a greater increase in HDL-C (p < 0.001) compared to metformin. The overall incidence of adverse effects was comparable (33.3% vs. 38.1%; p = 0.650), with no serious adverse events reported.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that empagliflozin is a promising alternative to metformin for managing metabolic complications in patients treated with clozapine or olanzapine. These findings warrant confirmation and further investigation in larger, long-term studies.

Trial registration: The trial was registered prospectively at the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) with the ID code IRCT20120215009014N538 on November 12, 2024.

恩格列净替代二甲双胍治疗抗精神病相关体重增加:双盲随机对照试验
背景:体重增加和代谢紊乱是氯氮平和奥氮平等抗精神病药物的常见不良反应。钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2 (SGLT2)抑制剂除了在血糖控制中的主要作用外,还与体重减轻和各种代谢参数的改善有关。本研究比较了恩格列净和二甲双胍在抗精神病药致体重增加(AIWG)患者中的疗效和安全性。方法:在这项为期12周的双盲随机对照试验中,84名患有精神分裂症或双相情感障碍并因氯氮平或奥氮平而体重增加的成年人被分配接受恩格列净(每天10mg)或二甲双胍(每天1000mg)。主要结局是体重从基线到第12周的百分比变化。次要结局包括绝对体重、身体质量指数(BMI)、腰围、腰臀比的变化,以及患者体重减轻≥5%的比例。探索性结果评估了血糖和脂质参数、空腹胰岛素和胰岛素抵抗(HOMA-IR)的变化。通过监测不良事件、停止治疗和严重不良事件来评估安全性。结果:84名随机受试者中,恩格列净组38名(90.5%)和二甲双胍组39名(92.9%)完成了为期12周的研究。两种治疗均显著降低了组内人体测量值(均p 0.05)。两组患者的血糖和血脂指标均有改善,但恩帕列净显著降低了TG (p = 0.004)、空腹胰岛素(p = 0.005)和HOMA-IR (p = 0.012),并显著增加了HDL-C (p)。结论:这些发现表明,恩帕列净是治疗氯氮平或奥氮平患者代谢并发症的一种有希望的替代方案。这些发现值得在更大规模的长期研究中得到证实和进一步调查。试验注册:该试验已于2024年11月12日在伊朗临床试验注册中心(IRCT)前瞻性注册,ID代码为IRCT20120215009014N538。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书