Validation of a Small Language Model for DSM-5 Substance Category Classification in Child Welfare Records.

IF 1.4
Brian E Perron, Dragan Stoll, Bryan G Victor, Zia Qi, Andreas Jud, Joseph P Ryan
{"title":"Validation of a Small Language Model for DSM-5 Substance Category Classification in Child Welfare Records.","authors":"Brian E Perron, Dragan Stoll, Bryan G Victor, Zia Qi, Andreas Jud, Joseph P Ryan","doi":"10.1080/26408066.2026.2673377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent studies have demonstrated that large language models (LLMs) can perform binary classification tasks on child welfare narratives, such as detecting the presence or absence of constructs such as substance-related problems, domestic violence, and firearms involvement. However, whether smaller locally deployable models can move beyond binary detection to classify specific substance types from these narratives remains untested.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Validate a locally hosted LLM classifier for identifying specific substance types aligned with DSM-5 categories in child welfare investigation narratives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A locally hosted 20-billion-parameter LLM classified child maltreatment investigation narratives from a Midwestern U.S. state. Records previously identified as containing substace-related problems were passed to a second classification stage targeting seven DSM-5 substance categories. Expert human review of 900 stratified cases assessed classification precision, recall, and agreement with the criterion standard (Cohen's kappa). Model reproducibility was evaluated using approximately 15,000 independently classified records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five substance categories achieved almost perfect criterion-standard agreement (κ = 0.94-1.00): alcohol, cannabis, opioid, stimulant, and sedative/hypnotic/anxiolytic. Classification precision ranged from 92% to 100% for these categories. Two low-prevalence categories (hallucinogen, inhalant) performed poorly. Run-to-run agreement ranged from 92.1% to 99.1% across the seven categories.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A small, locally hosted LLM can reliably classify substance types from child welfare administrative text, extending prior work on binary classification to multi-label substance identification. Operating entirely on local hardware and requiring no changes to existing data collection, the pipeline supports substance-specific surveillance, retrospective trend analysis, and improved alignment of services with the substance profiles of investigated families.</p>","PeriodicalId":73742,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evidence-based social work (2019)","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evidence-based social work (2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26408066.2026.2673377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recent studies have demonstrated that large language models (LLMs) can perform binary classification tasks on child welfare narratives, such as detecting the presence or absence of constructs such as substance-related problems, domestic violence, and firearms involvement. However, whether smaller locally deployable models can move beyond binary detection to classify specific substance types from these narratives remains untested.

Objective: Validate a locally hosted LLM classifier for identifying specific substance types aligned with DSM-5 categories in child welfare investigation narratives.

Methods: A locally hosted 20-billion-parameter LLM classified child maltreatment investigation narratives from a Midwestern U.S. state. Records previously identified as containing substace-related problems were passed to a second classification stage targeting seven DSM-5 substance categories. Expert human review of 900 stratified cases assessed classification precision, recall, and agreement with the criterion standard (Cohen's kappa). Model reproducibility was evaluated using approximately 15,000 independently classified records.

Results: Five substance categories achieved almost perfect criterion-standard agreement (κ = 0.94-1.00): alcohol, cannabis, opioid, stimulant, and sedative/hypnotic/anxiolytic. Classification precision ranged from 92% to 100% for these categories. Two low-prevalence categories (hallucinogen, inhalant) performed poorly. Run-to-run agreement ranged from 92.1% to 99.1% across the seven categories.

Conclusions: A small, locally hosted LLM can reliably classify substance types from child welfare administrative text, extending prior work on binary classification to multi-label substance identification. Operating entirely on local hardware and requiring no changes to existing data collection, the pipeline supports substance-specific surveillance, retrospective trend analysis, and improved alignment of services with the substance profiles of investigated families.

DSM-5儿童福利记录中物质类别分类的小语言模型验证。
背景:最近的研究表明,大型语言模型(llm)可以执行儿童福利叙事的二元分类任务,例如检测物质相关问题、家庭暴力和枪支参与等结构的存在或不存在。然而,较小的局部可部署模型是否能够超越二元检测,从这些叙述中对特定的物质类型进行分类,仍有待检验。目的:验证本地托管的LLM分类器,用于识别与DSM-5儿童福利调查叙述中类别一致的特定物质类型。方法:一个本地托管的200亿参数LLM分类了来自美国中西部州的儿童虐待调查叙述。先前确定的包含物质相关问题的记录被传递到第二个分类阶段,目标是七种DSM-5物质类别。专家对900个分层病例进行了人工审查,评估了分类精度、召回率和与标准标准(Cohen’s kappa)的一致性。使用大约15,000个独立分类的记录来评估模型的可重复性。结果:酒精类、大麻类、阿片类、兴奋剂类、镇静/催眠/抗焦虑类5类物质达到了近乎完美的标准一致性(κ = 0.94-1.00)。这些分类的分类精度从92%到100%不等。两种低流行率类别(致幻剂、吸入剂)表现不佳。在7个类别中,运行对运行的一致性从92.1%到99.1%不等。结论:一个小型的、本地托管的LLM可以可靠地从儿童福利行政文本中分类物质类型,将先前的二元分类工作扩展到多标签物质识别。该管道完全在本地硬件上运行,不需要改变现有的数据收集,支持特定物质的监测、回顾性趋势分析,并改进了服务与调查家庭物质概况的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书