Evaluating the reach, adoption, implementation, and effectiveness of a single occupational physiotherapy advice session for employees with low back pain: an RE-AIM evaluation.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Takahiro Miki, Genta Asano, Yuta Hagiwara, Hiroshi Takasaki
{"title":"Evaluating the reach, adoption, implementation, and effectiveness of a single occupational physiotherapy advice session for employees with low back pain: an RE-AIM evaluation.","authors":"Takahiro Miki, Genta Asano, Yuta Hagiwara, Hiroshi Takasaki","doi":"10.1093/tbm/ibag029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While biopsychosocial interventions are effective for low back pain (LBP), implementing them in workplace settings remains challenging due to resource constraints. We adapted a comprehensive biopsychosocial approach into a single, brief, individualized advice session to enhance real-world feasibility. This study aimed to evaluate the reach, adoption, implementation, and preliminary effectiveness of this program using the RE-AIM (Reach, Adoption, Implementation, Effectiveness, and Maintenance) framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective pre-post quasi-experimental study was conducted in a Japanese insurance company. Employees with LBP were invited to a single 30-min occupational physiotherapy advice session. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and 3 months. Effectiveness was evaluated using mean changes in pain (numerical rating scale) and disability (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire), supplemented by a responder analysis based on minimal important change (MIC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1201 eligible employees, 154 (12.8%) attended the session (Reach), and 68 (44.2%) provided completed the 3-month follow-up (Implementation). Regarding effectiveness, mean pain intensity showed no significant change (+0.12). However, the responder analysis revealed that 17.6% of participants achieved MIC in pain (≥2 points), and 35.3% were classified as meeting MIC in disability (≥2 points). Additionally, the proportion of participants perceiving LBP as the primary cause of productivity loss decreased from 58.8% to 16.2%. Between-group analyses showed no statistically significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This quasi-experimental evaluation suggests that a single 30-min workplace physiotherapy advice session is feasible to implement. Effectiveness findings were exploratory: mean pain intensity changed little and between-group differences were not statistically significant, while some attendees who completed follow-up met the MIC threshold for disability.</p>","PeriodicalId":48679,"journal":{"name":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibag029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While biopsychosocial interventions are effective for low back pain (LBP), implementing them in workplace settings remains challenging due to resource constraints. We adapted a comprehensive biopsychosocial approach into a single, brief, individualized advice session to enhance real-world feasibility. This study aimed to evaluate the reach, adoption, implementation, and preliminary effectiveness of this program using the RE-AIM (Reach, Adoption, Implementation, Effectiveness, and Maintenance) framework.

Methods: A prospective pre-post quasi-experimental study was conducted in a Japanese insurance company. Employees with LBP were invited to a single 30-min occupational physiotherapy advice session. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and 3 months. Effectiveness was evaluated using mean changes in pain (numerical rating scale) and disability (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire), supplemented by a responder analysis based on minimal important change (MIC).

Results: Of 1201 eligible employees, 154 (12.8%) attended the session (Reach), and 68 (44.2%) provided completed the 3-month follow-up (Implementation). Regarding effectiveness, mean pain intensity showed no significant change (+0.12). However, the responder analysis revealed that 17.6% of participants achieved MIC in pain (≥2 points), and 35.3% were classified as meeting MIC in disability (≥2 points). Additionally, the proportion of participants perceiving LBP as the primary cause of productivity loss decreased from 58.8% to 16.2%. Between-group analyses showed no statistically significant differences.

Conclusions: This quasi-experimental evaluation suggests that a single 30-min workplace physiotherapy advice session is feasible to implement. Effectiveness findings were exploratory: mean pain intensity changed little and between-group differences were not statistically significant, while some attendees who completed follow-up met the MIC threshold for disability.

评估下腰痛员工的单一职业物理治疗咨询会议的范围、采用、实施和有效性:RE-AIM评估。
背景:虽然生物心理社会干预对腰痛(LBP)有效,但由于资源限制,在工作场所实施这些干预仍然具有挑战性。我们将一个综合的生物心理社会方法改编成一个单一的、简短的、个性化的建议会议,以提高现实世界的可行性。本研究旨在使用RE-AIM (reach, adoption, implementation, effectiveness, and Maintenance)框架评估该项目的覆盖范围、采用、实施和初步有效性。方法:在日本某保险公司进行前瞻性岗前准实验研究。患有LBP的员工被邀请参加一个30分钟的职业物理治疗咨询会议。在基线和3个月时评估结果。采用疼痛(数值评定量表)和残疾(Roland-Morris残疾问卷)的平均变化来评估疗效,并辅以基于最小重要变化(MIC)的应答者分析。结果:在1201名符合条件的员工中,154名(12.8%)参加了会议(Reach), 68名(44.2%)完成了3个月的随访(实施)。在疗效方面,平均疼痛强度无显著变化(+0.12)。然而,应答者分析显示,17.6%的参与者在疼痛方面达到MIC(≥2分),35.3%的参与者在残疾方面达到MIC(≥2分)。此外,认为LBP是生产力损失的主要原因的参与者比例从58.8%下降到16.2%。组间分析无统计学差异。结论:这种准实验评估表明,一个30分钟的工作场所物理治疗咨询会议是可行的。有效性发现是探索性的:平均疼痛强度变化不大,组间差异无统计学意义,而一些完成随访的参与者达到了MIC残疾阈值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Translational Behavioral Medicine
Translational Behavioral Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Translational Behavioral Medicine publishes content that engages, informs, and catalyzes dialogue about behavioral medicine among the research, practice, and policy communities. TBM began receiving an Impact Factor in 2015 and currently holds an Impact Factor of 2.989. TBM is one of two journals published by the Society of Behavioral Medicine. The Society of Behavioral Medicine is a multidisciplinary organization of clinicians, educators, and scientists dedicated to promoting the study of the interactions of behavior with biology and the environment, and then applying that knowledge to improve the health and well-being of individuals, families, communities, and populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书