Incidence and Prognostic Value of TP53, STK11, and KEAP1 Mutations Between De Novo Versus Recurrent Actionable Mutation-Negative Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

IF 2.3 Q3 ONCOLOGY
World Journal of Oncology Pub Date : 2026-05-08 eCollection Date: 2026-06-01 DOI:10.14740/wjon2761
Jorge Raul Vazquez-Urrutia, Natasha Venugopal, Junjia Zhu, Takefumi Komiya
{"title":"Incidence and Prognostic Value of TP53, STK11, and KEAP1 Mutations Between <i>De Novo</i> Versus Recurrent Actionable Mutation-Negative Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.","authors":"Jorge Raul Vazquez-Urrutia, Natasha Venugopal, Junjia Zhu, Takefumi Komiya","doi":"10.14740/wjon2761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), mutations in TP53, STK11, and KEAP1 are common in tumors lacking actionable oncogenic drivers and have been associated with poor outcomes, though their prognostic impact remains context-dependent. We evaluated the incidence and prognostic significance of these mutations in actionable mutation-negative NSCLC, stratified by <i>de novo</i> versus recurrent disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 119 adult patients with NSCLC and available next-generation sequencing (NGS) results treated at our center through 2024. Cases with actionable mutations were excluded. Patients were classified as <i>de novo</i> (n = 82) or recurrent (n = 37) based on the disease status at the point of analysis. Between-group comparisons were done using Fisher's exact and Wilcoxon Rank-sum test. Overall survival and progression-free survival were assessed. All tests were two-sided and a P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TP53 mutations were most frequent (61% <i>de novo</i> vs. 54% recurrent; P > 0.05). STK11 and KEAP1 mutations occurred at similar rates between groups (5-15%; P > 0.05). Baseline clinical characteristics were balanced. No significant differences in overall or progression-free survival were observed by mutational status in either cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this real-world cohort of actionable mutation-negative NSCLC cases, we did not detect significant prognostic associations for TP53, STK11, and KEAP1 mutations, and their incidence was similar between <i>de novo</i> and recurrent disease. These findings underscore the need for larger studies to evaluate the prognostic utility of these mutations in this clinical context.</p>","PeriodicalId":46797,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Oncology","volume":"17 3","pages":"310-321"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13171259/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/wjon2761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), mutations in TP53, STK11, and KEAP1 are common in tumors lacking actionable oncogenic drivers and have been associated with poor outcomes, though their prognostic impact remains context-dependent. We evaluated the incidence and prognostic significance of these mutations in actionable mutation-negative NSCLC, stratified by de novo versus recurrent disease.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 119 adult patients with NSCLC and available next-generation sequencing (NGS) results treated at our center through 2024. Cases with actionable mutations were excluded. Patients were classified as de novo (n = 82) or recurrent (n = 37) based on the disease status at the point of analysis. Between-group comparisons were done using Fisher's exact and Wilcoxon Rank-sum test. Overall survival and progression-free survival were assessed. All tests were two-sided and a P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: TP53 mutations were most frequent (61% de novo vs. 54% recurrent; P > 0.05). STK11 and KEAP1 mutations occurred at similar rates between groups (5-15%; P > 0.05). Baseline clinical characteristics were balanced. No significant differences in overall or progression-free survival were observed by mutational status in either cohort.

Conclusion: In this real-world cohort of actionable mutation-negative NSCLC cases, we did not detect significant prognostic associations for TP53, STK11, and KEAP1 mutations, and their incidence was similar between de novo and recurrent disease. These findings underscore the need for larger studies to evaluate the prognostic utility of these mutations in this clinical context.

TP53、STK11和KEAP1突变在新生和复发的可操作突变阴性非小细胞肺癌中的发病率和预后价值:一项单中心回顾性研究
背景:在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中,TP53、STK11和KEAP1突变在缺乏可操作的致癌驱动因素的肿瘤中很常见,并且与不良预后相关,尽管它们的预后影响仍然依赖于环境。我们评估了这些突变在可操作的突变阴性NSCLC中的发生率和预后意义,并按新生和复发疾病分层。方法:我们回顾性分析了截至2024年在我们中心治疗的119例非小细胞肺癌成年患者和现有的下一代测序(NGS)结果。排除具有可操作突变的病例。根据分析时的疾病状况,将患者分为新生患者(n = 82)和复发患者(n = 37)。组间比较采用Fisher's exact和Wilcoxon Rank-sum检验。评估总生存期和无进展生存期。所有检验均为双侧检验,P值< 0.05为有统计学意义。结果:TP53突变发生率最高(61%为新发,54%为复发;P < 0.05)。STK11和KEAP1突变在两组间发生率相似(5-15%;P < 0.05)。基线临床特征平衡。在两个队列中,突变状态在总生存期或无进展生存期方面没有观察到显著差异。结论:在这个现实世界的可操作突变阴性NSCLC病例队列中,我们没有发现TP53、STK11和KEAP1突变与预后的显著关联,它们的发病率在新发和复发疾病之间相似。这些发现强调需要更大规模的研究来评估这些突变在这种临床背景下的预后效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
15.40%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: World Journal of Oncology, bimonthly, publishes original contributions describing basic research and clinical investigation of cancer, on the cellular, molecular, prevention, diagnosis, therapy and prognosis aspects. The submissions can be basic research or clinical investigation oriented. This journal welcomes those submissions focused on the clinical trials of new treatment modalities for cancer, and those submissions focused on molecular or cellular research of the oncology pathogenesis. Case reports submitted for consideration of publication should explore either a novel genomic event/description or a new safety signal from an oncolytic agent. The areas of interested manuscripts are these disciplines: tumor immunology and immunotherapy; cancer molecular pharmacology and chemotherapy; drug sensitivity and resistance; cancer epidemiology; clinical trials; cancer pathology; radiobiology and radiation oncology; solid tumor oncology; hematological malignancies; surgical oncology; pediatric oncology; molecular oncology and cancer genes; gene therapy; cancer endocrinology; cancer metastasis; prevention and diagnosis of cancer; other cancer related subjects. The types of manuscripts accepted are original article, review, editorial, short communication, case report, letter to the editor, book review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书