Towards quality indicators in palliative care education: An umbrella review.

IF 2.7 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative Care and Social Practice Pub Date : 2026-05-07 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26323524261440959
Anna J Pedrosa, Ulla Näppä, Minna Hökkä, Jose Pereira, Piret Paal, Jan Kaňák, Gabija Jarašiūnaitė-Fedosejeva, Michael Connolly, John Ellershaw, Sabina Antoniu, Gulcan Bagcivan, Laura Ciria-Suarez, Stephen Mason, Tania Pastrana
{"title":"Towards quality indicators in palliative care education: An umbrella review.","authors":"Anna J Pedrosa, Ulla Näppä, Minna Hökkä, Jose Pereira, Piret Paal, Jan Kaňák, Gabija Jarašiūnaitė-Fedosejeva, Michael Connolly, John Ellershaw, Sabina Antoniu, Gulcan Bagcivan, Laura Ciria-Suarez, Stephen Mason, Tania Pastrana","doi":"10.1177/26323524261440959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The global need for palliative care is increasing. To respond effectively, all healthcare professionals who care for persons with serious illnesses should be trained to provide core palliative care. Despite increasing recognition of its importance, education remains inconsistently implemented.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore and identify the essential elements that define and support palliative care education, and to propose a preliminary typology of structural, process, and outcome quality indicators.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An umbrella review was conducted according to the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology.</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>We systematically searched three electronic databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycInfo) for literature reviews on palliative care education. Data were analysed using a combined deductive-inductive qualitative approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four reviews were included in the analysis. Seven structural indicators were identified relating to the training and duration of palliative care exposure, instructional format/delivery, contents, structured course development, involvement of local staff and experts, multidisciplinary and context-specific learning, and organisational support. Seven process indicators were identified, encompassing experiential learning, multi-modal approaches, reflective practice and emotional processing, group-based peer learning, embedded learning, flexibility, and feedback. Six outcome indicators were identified, including the enhancement of competencies, sustainability and long-term impact, validated tools for evaluation, participant satisfaction, integration into routine practices, and impact on patients and families.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This umbrella review proposes an evidence-informed framework of potential quality indicators for palliative care education, offering guidance for curriculum design and policy development while identifying key areas requiring empirical refinement and validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":36693,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","volume":"20 ","pages":"26323524261440959"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13167286/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524261440959","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The global need for palliative care is increasing. To respond effectively, all healthcare professionals who care for persons with serious illnesses should be trained to provide core palliative care. Despite increasing recognition of its importance, education remains inconsistently implemented.

Objectives: To explore and identify the essential elements that define and support palliative care education, and to propose a preliminary typology of structural, process, and outcome quality indicators.

Design: An umbrella review was conducted according to the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology.

Data sources and methods: We systematically searched three electronic databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycInfo) for literature reviews on palliative care education. Data were analysed using a combined deductive-inductive qualitative approach.

Results: Twenty-four reviews were included in the analysis. Seven structural indicators were identified relating to the training and duration of palliative care exposure, instructional format/delivery, contents, structured course development, involvement of local staff and experts, multidisciplinary and context-specific learning, and organisational support. Seven process indicators were identified, encompassing experiential learning, multi-modal approaches, reflective practice and emotional processing, group-based peer learning, embedded learning, flexibility, and feedback. Six outcome indicators were identified, including the enhancement of competencies, sustainability and long-term impact, validated tools for evaluation, participant satisfaction, integration into routine practices, and impact on patients and families.

Conclusion: This umbrella review proposes an evidence-informed framework of potential quality indicators for palliative care education, offering guidance for curriculum design and policy development while identifying key areas requiring empirical refinement and validation.

迈向姑息治疗教育的质量指标:概括性回顾。
背景:全球对姑息治疗的需求正在增加。为了有效应对,所有照顾严重疾病患者的卫生保健专业人员都应接受培训,以提供核心姑息治疗。尽管人们越来越认识到教育的重要性,但教育的实施仍然不一致。目的:探索和确定定义和支持姑息治疗教育的基本要素,并提出结构、过程和结果质量指标的初步类型学。设计:根据乔安娜布里格斯研究所的方法进行了总体审查。数据来源和方法:我们系统地检索了三个电子数据库(CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycInfo),以获取有关姑息治疗教育的文献综述。数据分析使用综合演绎-归纳定性方法。结果:24篇综述被纳入分析。确定了七个结构性指标,涉及姑息治疗暴露的培训和持续时间、教学形式/交付、内容、结构化课程开发、当地工作人员和专家的参与、多学科和具体情况的学习以及组织支持。确定了七个过程指标,包括体验式学习、多模态方法、反思性实践和情感处理、基于群体的同伴学习、嵌入式学习、灵活性和反馈。确定了六个结果指标,包括能力增强、可持续性和长期影响、有效的评估工具、参与者满意度、融入常规做法以及对患者和家庭的影响。结论:本综述提出了一个基于证据的姑息治疗教育潜在质量指标框架,为课程设计和政策制定提供指导,同时确定了需要经验改进和验证的关键领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Palliative Care and Social Practice
Palliative Care and Social Practice Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书