Watch-and-wait in rectal cancer: A critical appraisal of promise, perils and unresolved contours of organ preservation (Review).

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Oncology Letters Pub Date : 2026-04-28 eCollection Date: 2026-07-01 DOI:10.3892/ol.2026.15631
Xinqiang Zhu, Beibei Ge, Linchun Wen, Siwei Shan
{"title":"Watch-and-wait in rectal cancer: A critical appraisal of promise, perils and unresolved contours of organ preservation (Review).","authors":"Xinqiang Zhu, Beibei Ge, Linchun Wen, Siwei Shan","doi":"10.3892/ol.2026.15631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Total neoadjuvant therapy has elevated pathological complete response (pCR) rates in locally advanced rectal cancer to unprecedented levels (25-30%), catalyzing interest in organ preservation via the non-surgical 'Watch-and -Wait' (WaW) strategy. Although this approach offers a paradigm shift, its rapid clinical adoption necessitates a critical appraisal of unresolved controversies. The present review synthesizes current evidence to outline the benefits of WaW while critically examining its inherent challenges. A comprehensive analysis interrogates the dualistic nature of WaW. It can provide favorable survival (5-year overall survival of 85% and cancer-specific survival of 94% in the International WaW Database) and meaningful quality-of-life improvements by avoiding radical surgery; concurrently, it embodies substantial risks due to the inherent imprecision of clinical complete response (cCR) assessment (a 10-25% discordance with pCR), a marked local regrowth rate (~25%) and unresolved long-term oncological uncertainties. In the present review it is argued that successful implementation of WaW depends on transcending current limitations through technological integration. Circulating tumor DNA is a promising but still investigational biomarker that may enable dynamic risk stratification; however, its clinical utility requires prospective validation. In conclusion, WaW has evolved from a radical concept to a reasonable, evidence-supported option within a precision oncology framework for a meticulously selected patient cohort, contingent upon rigorous multidisciplinary team assessment and an unwavering, structured surveillance protocol. Its future safety and efficacy will be defined by advances in response assessment, personalized monitoring and long-term outcome data.</p>","PeriodicalId":19503,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Letters","volume":"32 1","pages":"276"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13169478/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2026.15631","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Total neoadjuvant therapy has elevated pathological complete response (pCR) rates in locally advanced rectal cancer to unprecedented levels (25-30%), catalyzing interest in organ preservation via the non-surgical 'Watch-and -Wait' (WaW) strategy. Although this approach offers a paradigm shift, its rapid clinical adoption necessitates a critical appraisal of unresolved controversies. The present review synthesizes current evidence to outline the benefits of WaW while critically examining its inherent challenges. A comprehensive analysis interrogates the dualistic nature of WaW. It can provide favorable survival (5-year overall survival of 85% and cancer-specific survival of 94% in the International WaW Database) and meaningful quality-of-life improvements by avoiding radical surgery; concurrently, it embodies substantial risks due to the inherent imprecision of clinical complete response (cCR) assessment (a 10-25% discordance with pCR), a marked local regrowth rate (~25%) and unresolved long-term oncological uncertainties. In the present review it is argued that successful implementation of WaW depends on transcending current limitations through technological integration. Circulating tumor DNA is a promising but still investigational biomarker that may enable dynamic risk stratification; however, its clinical utility requires prospective validation. In conclusion, WaW has evolved from a radical concept to a reasonable, evidence-supported option within a precision oncology framework for a meticulously selected patient cohort, contingent upon rigorous multidisciplinary team assessment and an unwavering, structured surveillance protocol. Its future safety and efficacy will be defined by advances in response assessment, personalized monitoring and long-term outcome data.

直肠癌的观察和等待:对器官保存的希望、危险和未解决的轮廓的批判性评估(综述)。
总的新辅助治疗将局部晚期直肠癌的病理完全缓解(pCR)率提高到前所未有的水平(25-30%),通过非手术“观察和等待”(WaW)策略催化了器官保存的兴趣。尽管这种方法提供了一种范式转变,但其快速临床应用需要对未解决的争议进行批判性评估。本综述综合了目前的证据,概述了WaW的好处,同时批判性地审视了其固有的挑战。综合分析对战争战争的二元性进行了质疑。它可以提供良好的生存(国际WaW数据库中5年总生存率为85%,癌症特异性生存率为94%),并通过避免根治性手术改善生活质量;同时,由于临床完全缓解(cCR)评估固有的不精确性(与pCR有10-25%的不一致性)、明显的局部再生率(~25%)和未解决的长期肿瘤不确定性,它具有很大的风险。在本综述中,认为WaW的成功实施取决于通过技术集成超越当前的限制。循环肿瘤DNA是一种很有前途但仍在研究中的生物标志物,可以实现动态风险分层;然而,其临床应用需要前瞻性验证。总之,WaW已经从一个激进的概念演变为一个合理的、有证据支持的选择,在精确的肿瘤学框架内,针对精心挑选的患者群体,取决于严格的多学科团队评估和坚定的、结构化的监测方案。其未来的安全性和有效性将由反应评估、个性化监测和长期结果数据的进展来确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oncology Letters
Oncology Letters ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
412
审稿时长
2.0 months
期刊介绍: Oncology Letters is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal, available in print and online, that focuses on all aspects of clinical oncology, as well as in vitro and in vivo experimental model systems relevant to the mechanisms of disease. The principal aim of Oncology Letters is to provide the prompt publication of original studies of high quality that pertain to clinical oncology, chemotherapy, oncogenes, carcinogenesis, metastasis, epidemiology and viral oncology in the form of original research, reviews and case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书