Protocol for a feasibility study, without control group, of a combined treatment for PTSD and difficulties in emotion regulation for patients with substance use disorder.

IF 2.1 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Johanna Vigfusdottir, Edvard Breivik, Erlend Mork, Lars Lien, Håkon Stenmark, Egil Jonsbu
{"title":"Protocol for a feasibility study, without control group, of a combined treatment for PTSD and difficulties in emotion regulation for patients with substance use disorder.","authors":"Johanna Vigfusdottir, Edvard Breivik, Erlend Mork, Lars Lien, Håkon Stenmark, Egil Jonsbu","doi":"10.1186/s40814-026-01834-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are high rates of co-occurring post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among patients in treatment for substance use disorder (SUD). PTSD and SUD should be treated simultaneously, which is rarely the case. The reluctance to offer trauma-focused treatment is partially due to fear of increased risk of dropout. PTSD is related to emotion dysregulation and elevated psychological burden, higher dropout rates and increased risk of relapse. In this project, we plan to assess if it is relevant, feasible, acceptable and safe to add a combination of narrative exposure therapy (NET) and dialectical behaviour therapy for substance use disorder skills training (DBT-SUD Skills) to standard inpatient SUD treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We will recruit patients from a long-term inpatient SUD treatment centre on the west coast of Norway (N approx. = 90). We will assess relevance based on the prevalence of PTSD/Subthreshold-PTSD and traumatic experiences, suicidal behaviour, self-harm, and the severity of difficulties in emotion regulation. We will assess acceptability with treatment participation among patients and the subjective experience of the treatment. We will measure safety with the rate of dropout and destructive behaviour in the treatment period.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>It is important to develop and evaluate treatment options for this vulnerable patient population, often excluded from clinical research. Strengths include a naturalistic setting and historical data for comparison. Limitations are the absence of a control group and inability to isolate component effects. The results can be used to develop a treatment protocol for combining NET and DBT-skills training to in patient SUD treatment for further development and testing in a multicentre Protocol following SPIRIT 2025 guidelines.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on 3 April 2024 (#203,428).</p>","PeriodicalId":20176,"journal":{"name":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13343655/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-026-01834-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There are high rates of co-occurring post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among patients in treatment for substance use disorder (SUD). PTSD and SUD should be treated simultaneously, which is rarely the case. The reluctance to offer trauma-focused treatment is partially due to fear of increased risk of dropout. PTSD is related to emotion dysregulation and elevated psychological burden, higher dropout rates and increased risk of relapse. In this project, we plan to assess if it is relevant, feasible, acceptable and safe to add a combination of narrative exposure therapy (NET) and dialectical behaviour therapy for substance use disorder skills training (DBT-SUD Skills) to standard inpatient SUD treatment.

Methods: We will recruit patients from a long-term inpatient SUD treatment centre on the west coast of Norway (N approx. = 90). We will assess relevance based on the prevalence of PTSD/Subthreshold-PTSD and traumatic experiences, suicidal behaviour, self-harm, and the severity of difficulties in emotion regulation. We will assess acceptability with treatment participation among patients and the subjective experience of the treatment. We will measure safety with the rate of dropout and destructive behaviour in the treatment period.

Discussion: It is important to develop and evaluate treatment options for this vulnerable patient population, often excluded from clinical research. Strengths include a naturalistic setting and historical data for comparison. Limitations are the absence of a control group and inability to isolate component effects. The results can be used to develop a treatment protocol for combining NET and DBT-skills training to in patient SUD treatment for further development and testing in a multicentre Protocol following SPIRIT 2025 guidelines.

Trial registration: This trial was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on 3 April 2024 (#203,428).

药物使用障碍患者创伤后应激障碍和情绪调节困难联合治疗的可行性研究方案,无对照组。
背景:在药物使用障碍(SUD)治疗的患者中,同时发生创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的比例很高。PTSD和SUD应同时治疗,但这种情况很少发生。不愿提供以创伤为重点的治疗,部分原因是担心辍学的风险增加。PTSD与情绪失调、心理负担加重、辍学率高、复发风险增加有关。在本项目中,我们计划评估将叙事暴露疗法(NET)和物质使用障碍技能培训辩证行为疗法(DBT-SUD skills)的组合添加到标准住院患者SUD治疗中是否相关、可行、可接受和安全。方法:我们将从挪威西海岸的一家长期住院的SUD治疗中心招募患者(N约= 90)。我们将根据PTSD/亚阈值-PTSD和创伤经历、自杀行为、自残以及情绪调节困难的严重程度来评估相关性。我们将评估患者参与治疗的可接受性和治疗的主观体验。我们将用治疗期间的退学率和破坏性行为来衡量安全性。讨论:为这一易受伤害的患者群体制定和评估治疗方案非常重要,他们通常被排除在临床研究之外。优势包括自然环境和历史数据的比较。限制是缺乏对照组和无法分离成分的影响。研究结果可用于制定一项治疗方案,将NET和dbt技能培训结合起来,用于患者SUD治疗,以便根据SPIRIT 2025指南在多中心方案中进一步开发和测试。试验注册:该试验于2024年4月3日(#203,428)在ClinicalTrials.gov上回顾性注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Pilot and Feasibility Studies Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
241
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Pilot and Feasibility Studies encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of pilot and feasibility studies in biomedicine. The journal publishes research articles that are intended to directly influence future clinical trials or large scale observational studies, as well as protocols, commentaries and methodology articles. The journal also ensures that the results of all well-conducted, peer-reviewed, pilot and feasibility studies are published, regardless of outcome or significance of findings. Pilot and feasibility studies are increasingly conducted prior to a full randomized controlled trial. However, these studies often lack clear objectives, many remain unpublished, and there is confusion over the meanings of the words “pilot” and “feasibility”. Pilot and Feasibility Studies provides a forum for discussion around this key aspect of the scientific process, and seeks to ensure that these studies are published, so as to complete the publication thread for clinical research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书