Selection into Advanced Training in Rheumatology in Australia: towards a programmatic and theory-informed model.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Internal Medicine Journal Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-15 DOI:10.1111/imj.70479
Narainraj Kamalaraj, Andrew Lim, Arvin Damodaran, Louise Ward, E Michael Shanahan
{"title":"Selection into Advanced Training in Rheumatology in Australia: towards a programmatic and theory-informed model.","authors":"Narainraj Kamalaraj, Andrew Lim, Arvin Damodaran, Louise Ward, E Michael Shanahan","doi":"10.1111/imj.70479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Selection into vocational medical specialty programmes such as Advanced Training in Rheumatology in Australia is fraught with complexity. Selection panels must identify suitable trainees while navigating eligibility standards set by the Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP), complying with state-based employment legislation and responding to broader social and political expectations. While functional, this federated system exhibits variation in selection strategy, methodology, governance, transparency and panel composition. Evidence for selection into vocational medical training is limited, and practice is mainly derived from medical student selection research, with no published studies evaluating the predictive validity of Rheumatology Advanced Training selection methods in Australia. The recent shift towards programmatic assessment across the RACP has prompted a major revision of the rheumatology curriculum in 2026. This transition presents an opportunity to evaluate current selection strategies and their alignment with key competencies. Drawing on national workshops convened by the Australian Rheumatology Association and contemporary validity theory, this article proposes a theory-informed framework for selection into Advanced Training in Rheumatology. Rheumatology is therefore well positioned to develop a defensible, evidence-informed and socially accountable approach to specialty selection within the RACP.</p>","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1654-1659"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13547897/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70479","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Selection into vocational medical specialty programmes such as Advanced Training in Rheumatology in Australia is fraught with complexity. Selection panels must identify suitable trainees while navigating eligibility standards set by the Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP), complying with state-based employment legislation and responding to broader social and political expectations. While functional, this federated system exhibits variation in selection strategy, methodology, governance, transparency and panel composition. Evidence for selection into vocational medical training is limited, and practice is mainly derived from medical student selection research, with no published studies evaluating the predictive validity of Rheumatology Advanced Training selection methods in Australia. The recent shift towards programmatic assessment across the RACP has prompted a major revision of the rheumatology curriculum in 2026. This transition presents an opportunity to evaluate current selection strategies and their alignment with key competencies. Drawing on national workshops convened by the Australian Rheumatology Association and contemporary validity theory, this article proposes a theory-informed framework for selection into Advanced Training in Rheumatology. Rheumatology is therefore well positioned to develop a defensible, evidence-informed and socially accountable approach to specialty selection within the RACP.

澳大利亚风湿病学高级培训的选择:朝着程序化和理论知情的模式发展。
选择进入职业医学专业课程,如澳大利亚的风湿病高级培训,充满了复杂性。选拔小组必须确定合适的学员,同时遵循澳大利亚皇家医师学院(RACP)制定的资格标准,遵守以州为基础的就业立法,并回应更广泛的社会和政治期望。虽然功能齐全,但这个联邦系统在选择策略、方法、治理、透明度和小组组成方面表现出变化。选择进入职业医学培训的证据有限,实践主要来自医学生选择研究,没有发表的研究评估澳大利亚风湿病高级培训选择方法的预测有效性。最近整个RACP向计划性评估的转变促使了2026年风湿病学课程的重大修订。这种转变为评估当前的选择策略及其与关键能力的一致性提供了机会。借鉴澳大利亚风湿病学会召开的全国研讨会和当代有效性理论,本文提出了一个选择风湿病高级培训的理论知情框架。因此,风湿病学处于有利地位,可以在RACP内开发一种可辩护的、循证的和对社会负责的专业选择方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Internal Medicine Journal
Internal Medicine Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
600
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Internal Medicine Journal is the official journal of the Adult Medicine Division of The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP). Its purpose is to publish high-quality internationally competitive peer-reviewed original medical research, both laboratory and clinical, relating to the study and research of human disease. Papers will be considered from all areas of medical practice and science. The Journal also has a major role in continuing medical education and publishes review articles relevant to physician education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书