Comparison between Localized Skin-Friction Reduction and Suction on a Supercritical Airfoil

IF 2.2 3区 工程技术 Q3 MECHANICS
Annika Frede, Giulio Soldati, Sergio Pirozzoli, Niccolò Berizzi, Maurizio Quadrio, Davide Gatti
{"title":"Comparison between Localized Skin-Friction Reduction and Suction on a Supercritical Airfoil","authors":"Annika Frede,&nbsp;Giulio Soldati,&nbsp;Sergio Pirozzoli,&nbsp;Niccolò Berizzi,&nbsp;Maurizio Quadrio,&nbsp;Davide Gatti","doi":"10.1007/s10494-026-00748-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this work, direct numerical simulations are used to investigate which physical effects of active flow control are most relevant for improving the aerodynamic performance of airfoils. To this end, two active flow control strategies based on inherently different physical mechanisms are systematically compared on the upper surface of the supercritical V2C airfoil in compressible transonic flow. The first strategy consists of streamwise-travelling waves of spanwise wall velocity (StTW), a skin-friction drag reduction technique that locally decreases wall shear stress in the region of application. The second strategy is uniform wall-normal suction, which locally increases skin-friction drag. One strength of the present study is that the control configurations are evaluated at matched lift coefficients to isolate the impact of the control mechanisms on drag components, boundary-layer development, shock position, and energetic cost. Despite their opposite local effects on skin-friction drag, both control strategies yield comparable and significant improvements in global aerodynamic efficiency. The analysis reveals that, for both approaches, the dominant mechanism responsible for the efficiency increase is a downstream displacement of the shock, accompanied by a reduction in boundary-layer momentum thickness. These results highlight the central role of shock–boundary-layer interaction control in enhancing transonic aerodynamic performance and demonstrate that skin-friction drag reduction alone is not a sufficient metric for assessing the effectiveness of active flow control strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":559,"journal":{"name":"Flow, Turbulence and Combustion","volume":"116 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10494-026-00748-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Flow, Turbulence and Combustion","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10494-026-00748-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this work, direct numerical simulations are used to investigate which physical effects of active flow control are most relevant for improving the aerodynamic performance of airfoils. To this end, two active flow control strategies based on inherently different physical mechanisms are systematically compared on the upper surface of the supercritical V2C airfoil in compressible transonic flow. The first strategy consists of streamwise-travelling waves of spanwise wall velocity (StTW), a skin-friction drag reduction technique that locally decreases wall shear stress in the region of application. The second strategy is uniform wall-normal suction, which locally increases skin-friction drag. One strength of the present study is that the control configurations are evaluated at matched lift coefficients to isolate the impact of the control mechanisms on drag components, boundary-layer development, shock position, and energetic cost. Despite their opposite local effects on skin-friction drag, both control strategies yield comparable and significant improvements in global aerodynamic efficiency. The analysis reveals that, for both approaches, the dominant mechanism responsible for the efficiency increase is a downstream displacement of the shock, accompanied by a reduction in boundary-layer momentum thickness. These results highlight the central role of shock–boundary-layer interaction control in enhancing transonic aerodynamic performance and demonstrate that skin-friction drag reduction alone is not a sufficient metric for assessing the effectiveness of active flow control strategies.

Abstract Image

超临界翼型局部摩擦减少与吸力的比较
在这项工作中,直接的数值模拟被用来研究哪些物理效应的主动流动控制是最相关的改善翼型的气动性能。为此,在超临界V2C翼型可压缩跨声速流动中,系统比较了两种基于内在不同物理机制的主动流动控制策略。第一种策略包括沿流传播的横向壁面速度波(StTW),这是一种表面摩擦减阻技术,可以局部降低应用区域的壁面剪切应力。第二种策略是均匀的壁向吸力,这在局部增加了表面摩擦阻力。本研究的一个优点是,在匹配的升力系数下评估控制配置,以隔离控制机制对阻力分量、边界层发展、冲击位置和能量成本的影响。尽管它们对表面摩擦阻力的局部影响相反,但这两种控制策略在整体气动效率方面都产生了相当大的改善。分析表明,对于这两种方法,导致效率提高的主要机制是激波的下游位移,伴随着边界层动量厚度的减小。这些结果强调了激波-边界层相互作用控制在提高跨声速气动性能方面的核心作用,并表明单靠表面摩擦阻力减少不足以评估主动流动控制策略的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Flow, Turbulence and Combustion
Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 工程技术-力学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
72
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Flow, Turbulence and Combustion provides a global forum for the publication of original and innovative research results that contribute to the solution of fundamental and applied problems encountered in single-phase, multi-phase and reacting flows, in both idealized and real systems. The scope of coverage encompasses topics in fluid dynamics, scalar transport, multi-physics interactions and flow control. From time to time the journal publishes Special or Theme Issues featuring invited articles. Contributions may report research that falls within the broad spectrum of analytical, computational and experimental methods. This includes research conducted in academia, industry and a variety of environmental and geophysical sectors. Turbulence, transition and associated phenomena are expected to play a significant role in the majority of studies reported, although non-turbulent flows, typical of those in micro-devices, would be regarded as falling within the scope covered. The emphasis is on originality, timeliness, quality and thematic fit, as exemplified by the title of the journal and the qualifications described above. Relevance to real-world problems and industrial applications are regarded as strengths.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书