{"title":"Comparison between Localized Skin-Friction Reduction and Suction on a Supercritical Airfoil","authors":"Annika Frede, Giulio Soldati, Sergio Pirozzoli, Niccolò Berizzi, Maurizio Quadrio, Davide Gatti","doi":"10.1007/s10494-026-00748-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this work, direct numerical simulations are used to investigate which physical effects of active flow control are most relevant for improving the aerodynamic performance of airfoils. To this end, two active flow control strategies based on inherently different physical mechanisms are systematically compared on the upper surface of the supercritical V2C airfoil in compressible transonic flow. The first strategy consists of streamwise-travelling waves of spanwise wall velocity (StTW), a skin-friction drag reduction technique that locally decreases wall shear stress in the region of application. The second strategy is uniform wall-normal suction, which locally increases skin-friction drag. One strength of the present study is that the control configurations are evaluated at matched lift coefficients to isolate the impact of the control mechanisms on drag components, boundary-layer development, shock position, and energetic cost. Despite their opposite local effects on skin-friction drag, both control strategies yield comparable and significant improvements in global aerodynamic efficiency. The analysis reveals that, for both approaches, the dominant mechanism responsible for the efficiency increase is a downstream displacement of the shock, accompanied by a reduction in boundary-layer momentum thickness. These results highlight the central role of shock–boundary-layer interaction control in enhancing transonic aerodynamic performance and demonstrate that skin-friction drag reduction alone is not a sufficient metric for assessing the effectiveness of active flow control strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":559,"journal":{"name":"Flow, Turbulence and Combustion","volume":"116 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10494-026-00748-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Flow, Turbulence and Combustion","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10494-026-00748-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this work, direct numerical simulations are used to investigate which physical effects of active flow control are most relevant for improving the aerodynamic performance of airfoils. To this end, two active flow control strategies based on inherently different physical mechanisms are systematically compared on the upper surface of the supercritical V2C airfoil in compressible transonic flow. The first strategy consists of streamwise-travelling waves of spanwise wall velocity (StTW), a skin-friction drag reduction technique that locally decreases wall shear stress in the region of application. The second strategy is uniform wall-normal suction, which locally increases skin-friction drag. One strength of the present study is that the control configurations are evaluated at matched lift coefficients to isolate the impact of the control mechanisms on drag components, boundary-layer development, shock position, and energetic cost. Despite their opposite local effects on skin-friction drag, both control strategies yield comparable and significant improvements in global aerodynamic efficiency. The analysis reveals that, for both approaches, the dominant mechanism responsible for the efficiency increase is a downstream displacement of the shock, accompanied by a reduction in boundary-layer momentum thickness. These results highlight the central role of shock–boundary-layer interaction control in enhancing transonic aerodynamic performance and demonstrate that skin-friction drag reduction alone is not a sufficient metric for assessing the effectiveness of active flow control strategies.
期刊介绍:
Flow, Turbulence and Combustion provides a global forum for the publication of original and innovative research results that contribute to the solution of fundamental and applied problems encountered in single-phase, multi-phase and reacting flows, in both idealized and real systems. The scope of coverage encompasses topics in fluid dynamics, scalar transport, multi-physics interactions and flow control. From time to time the journal publishes Special or Theme Issues featuring invited articles.
Contributions may report research that falls within the broad spectrum of analytical, computational and experimental methods. This includes research conducted in academia, industry and a variety of environmental and geophysical sectors. Turbulence, transition and associated phenomena are expected to play a significant role in the majority of studies reported, although non-turbulent flows, typical of those in micro-devices, would be regarded as falling within the scope covered. The emphasis is on originality, timeliness, quality and thematic fit, as exemplified by the title of the journal and the qualifications described above. Relevance to real-world problems and industrial applications are regarded as strengths.