Point-of-care ultrasound for the prediction of fluid responsiveness in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a comparison between carotid Doppler peak systolic velocity and inferior vena cava distensibility index: a prospective observational trial.

IF 3.6
Sabah Naguib Barsoom Ayoub, Ramy Mahrose, Abdelkader Abdelrahman Elbakry, Mohammed Sayed Shorbagy
{"title":"Point-of-care ultrasound for the prediction of fluid responsiveness in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a comparison between carotid Doppler peak systolic velocity and inferior vena cava distensibility index: a prospective observational trial.","authors":"Sabah Naguib Barsoom Ayoub, Ramy Mahrose, Abdelkader Abdelrahman Elbakry, Mohammed Sayed Shorbagy","doi":"10.17085/apm.25342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence remains inconclusive regarding the ability of the inferior vena cava (IVC) distensibility index and common carotid Doppler flow velocity parameters to predict fluid responsiveness before off-pump cardiac surgery. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the relationship between the IVC distensibility index, common carotid Doppler flow velocity parameters, and fluid responsiveness during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective observational study conducted at Ain Shams University Hospitals (Cardiothoracic Academy), 30 adult patients (ejection fraction > 45%) scheduled for off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery after an 8-h fasting period were enrolled. Following induction of anesthesia, a fluid challenge of 5 ml/kg crystalloid was administered. Hemodynamic variables (mean arterial pressure, heart rate, central venous pressure, IVC distensibility index, common carotid Doppler peak velocity, and transthoracic cardiac output [CO]) were recorded before and after fluid loading. An increase in CO of > 15% after the fluid challenge indicates fluid responsiveness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sonographic measurements demonstrated statistically significant changes in CO following fluid loading. However, neither the change in the IVC distensibility index (ΔIVC) nor the change in carotid Doppler peak systolic velocity (ΔVpeakCCA) demonstrated adequate discriminatory ability to differentiate fluid responders from non-responders in this cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Point-of-care ultrasound parameters, including the IVC distensibility index and carotid Doppler velocity, showed limited value for predicting fluid responsiveness in off-pump cardiac surgery and, therefore, should not be used in isolation to guide perioperative fluid administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":101360,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.25342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evidence remains inconclusive regarding the ability of the inferior vena cava (IVC) distensibility index and common carotid Doppler flow velocity parameters to predict fluid responsiveness before off-pump cardiac surgery. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the relationship between the IVC distensibility index, common carotid Doppler flow velocity parameters, and fluid responsiveness during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.

Methods: In this prospective observational study conducted at Ain Shams University Hospitals (Cardiothoracic Academy), 30 adult patients (ejection fraction > 45%) scheduled for off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery after an 8-h fasting period were enrolled. Following induction of anesthesia, a fluid challenge of 5 ml/kg crystalloid was administered. Hemodynamic variables (mean arterial pressure, heart rate, central venous pressure, IVC distensibility index, common carotid Doppler peak velocity, and transthoracic cardiac output [CO]) were recorded before and after fluid loading. An increase in CO of > 15% after the fluid challenge indicates fluid responsiveness.

Results: Sonographic measurements demonstrated statistically significant changes in CO following fluid loading. However, neither the change in the IVC distensibility index (ΔIVC) nor the change in carotid Doppler peak systolic velocity (ΔVpeakCCA) demonstrated adequate discriminatory ability to differentiate fluid responders from non-responders in this cohort.

Conclusions: Point-of-care ultrasound parameters, including the IVC distensibility index and carotid Doppler velocity, showed limited value for predicting fluid responsiveness in off-pump cardiac surgery and, therefore, should not be used in isolation to guide perioperative fluid administration.

即时超声预测非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术中液体反应性:颈动脉多普勒峰值收缩速度和下腔静脉扩张指数的比较:一项前瞻性观察性试验。
背景:关于下腔静脉(IVC)扩张指数和总颈动脉多普勒血流速度参数在非体外循环心脏手术前预测液体反应的能力,证据仍然不确定。因此,我们试图评估非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术中下腔静脉扩张指数、颈总动脉多普勒血流速度参数和液体反应性之间的关系。方法:在Ain Shams大学医院(cardithoracic Academy)进行的这项前瞻性观察研究中,30名成年患者(射血分数> 45%)在禁食8小时后计划进行非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术。麻醉诱导后,给予5 ml/kg晶体液体刺激。血流动力学变量(平均动脉压、心率、中心静脉压、下腔静脉扩张指数、颈总动脉多普勒峰值速度、经胸心输出量[CO])记录在补液前后。在流体注入后,CO增加了150 %,表明流体响应性。结果:超声测量显示,在流体加载后,CO有统计学意义的变化。然而,无论是下腔静脉扩张指数的变化(ΔIVC)还是颈动脉多普勒峰值收缩速度的变化(ΔVpeakCCA)都没有显示出足够的区分能力来区分该队列中液体反应者和无反应者。结论:包括下腔静脉扩张指数和颈动脉多普勒速度在内的护理点超声参数在非体外循环心脏手术中预测液体反应性的价值有限,因此不应单独用于指导围手术期液体给药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书