Psychedelics, Eleusis, and the Invention of Religious Experience.

Psychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.) Pub Date : 2026-02-19 eCollection Date: 2026-03-01 DOI:10.1177/28314425251361835
Sharday Mosurinjohn, Richard Ascough
{"title":"Psychedelics, Eleusis, and the Invention of Religious Experience.","authors":"Sharday Mosurinjohn, Richard Ascough","doi":"10.1177/28314425251361835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This article corrects an idea in psychedelic science and culture that the ancient Eleusynian Mysteries used psychedelics, as claimed by Carl Ruck and co-authors in <i>The Road to Eleusis: Unveiling the Secret of the Mysteries</i> (1978), revitalized by Brian Muraresku's <i>The Immortality Key: The Secret History of the Religion with No Name</i> (2020), and popularized by social media heavyweights such as Joe Rogan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>It begins by exposing critical methodological flaws in the arguments, namely, a pattern of presenting claims, followed by mild circumstantial evidence, rhetorically solidifying the interpretation of this evidence into a \"fact,\" on which is built each subsequent round of conjecture.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>We then explore how the dogged pursuit of evidentiary mirages contributes to the project of establishing a western civilizational pedigree to dignify the use of stigmatized drugs and revitalize experiential religion.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Although the desire for legitimacy and meaning is understandable, the strategies used by the writers of this pseudo-history constitute a kind of religious fundamentalism. Their writing attempts to show that a relatively new practice is the old, true religion, in this case, the \"religion with no name\" that underlies every religious tradition. In doing so, they miss seriously relating to the many well-documented historical and living Indigenous histories of psychedelics, or seeing contemporary psychedelic practice in continuity with other, and maybe even older, nonpharmacological methods of changing consciousness. Overall, the \"psychedelic Eleusis\" discourse focuses on the purported Eleusynian drug and its phenomenology rather than focusing on practices for taking up the spiritual injunctions of those psychedelic experiences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We conclude that, given how the psychedelic hypothesis is fundamentally flawed in its study of antiquity, it is a shaky foundation on which to build an argument for modern psychedelic use for therapeutic and spiritual practice. Since scholarly research is key to moving forward decriminalization, legalization, medical regulation, and other roles for psychedelics in society, it is crucial that scholars and popular audiences communicate effectively around psychedelic history and culture. Instead of committing to a specific (and erroneous) view of history, psychedelic scholarship must commit to academic discussion and debate.</p>","PeriodicalId":74590,"journal":{"name":"Psychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","volume":"4 1","pages":"35-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13089287/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/28314425251361835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This article corrects an idea in psychedelic science and culture that the ancient Eleusynian Mysteries used psychedelics, as claimed by Carl Ruck and co-authors in The Road to Eleusis: Unveiling the Secret of the Mysteries (1978), revitalized by Brian Muraresku's The Immortality Key: The Secret History of the Religion with No Name (2020), and popularized by social media heavyweights such as Joe Rogan.

Methods: It begins by exposing critical methodological flaws in the arguments, namely, a pattern of presenting claims, followed by mild circumstantial evidence, rhetorically solidifying the interpretation of this evidence into a "fact," on which is built each subsequent round of conjecture.

Analysis: We then explore how the dogged pursuit of evidentiary mirages contributes to the project of establishing a western civilizational pedigree to dignify the use of stigmatized drugs and revitalize experiential religion.

Discussion: Although the desire for legitimacy and meaning is understandable, the strategies used by the writers of this pseudo-history constitute a kind of religious fundamentalism. Their writing attempts to show that a relatively new practice is the old, true religion, in this case, the "religion with no name" that underlies every religious tradition. In doing so, they miss seriously relating to the many well-documented historical and living Indigenous histories of psychedelics, or seeing contemporary psychedelic practice in continuity with other, and maybe even older, nonpharmacological methods of changing consciousness. Overall, the "psychedelic Eleusis" discourse focuses on the purported Eleusynian drug and its phenomenology rather than focusing on practices for taking up the spiritual injunctions of those psychedelic experiences.

Conclusions: We conclude that, given how the psychedelic hypothesis is fundamentally flawed in its study of antiquity, it is a shaky foundation on which to build an argument for modern psychedelic use for therapeutic and spiritual practice. Since scholarly research is key to moving forward decriminalization, legalization, medical regulation, and other roles for psychedelics in society, it is crucial that scholars and popular audiences communicate effectively around psychedelic history and culture. Instead of committing to a specific (and erroneous) view of history, psychedelic scholarship must commit to academic discussion and debate.

迷幻药、伊莱乌西斯和宗教体验的发明。
简介:本文纠正了迷幻科学和文化中的一种观点,即古代eleusniian奥秘使用了迷幻剂,正如卡尔·鲁克及其合著者在《通往Eleusis之路:揭开神秘的秘密》(1978)中所声称的那样,由布莱恩·穆拉雷斯库的《不朽的钥匙:无名宗教的秘史》(2020)中重新焕发活力,并由乔·罗根等社交媒体重量级人物推广。方法:它首先暴露了论证中关键的方法论缺陷,即提出主张的模式,随后是温和的间接证据,在修辞上将这些证据的解释固化为“事实”,在此基础上建立后续的每一轮猜想。分析:接下来,我们将探讨对证据幻影的顽强追求如何有助于建立西方文明谱系,从而使污名化药物的使用得到尊重,并使体验宗教重新焕发活力。讨论:虽然对合法性和意义的渴望是可以理解的,但这种伪历史的作者所使用的策略构成了一种宗教原教旨主义。他们的作品试图表明,一个相对较新的实践是古老的,真正的宗教,在这种情况下,“没有名字的宗教”是每一个宗教传统的基础。在这样做的过程中,他们严重错过了许多有充分记录的历史和活生生的土著迷幻药历史,也没有看到当代迷幻药实践与其他甚至更古老的、改变意识的非药物方法的连续性。总的来说,“迷幻的伊莱乌西斯”论述关注的是所谓的伊莱乌西斯毒品及其现象学,而不是关注那些迷幻体验的精神禁令的实践。结论:我们的结论是,考虑到迷幻药假说在对古代的研究中存在根本性的缺陷,在此基础上建立现代迷幻药用于治疗和精神实践的论点是不可靠的。由于学术研究是推动迷幻药非犯罪化、合法化、医疗监管和其他社会角色的关键,因此学者和大众就迷幻药的历史和文化进行有效沟通至关重要。迷幻学研究必须致力于学术讨论和辩论,而不是致力于特定的(和错误的)历史观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书