Efficacy and Safety of Psychoactive Tryptamines in Addiction: A Systematic Review.

Psychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.) Pub Date : 2026-02-24 eCollection Date: 2026-03-01 DOI:10.1177/28314425251364182
Pim B van der Meer, Nout Schukking, Maarten Dik, Aumer van Reemst, Juan J Fuentes, Ad A Kaptein, Jan W Schoones, Sebastiaan Verboeket, Marleen M de Waal, Anneke E Goudriaan, Cornelis Kramers, Arnt Schellekens, Matthijs G Bossong, Metten Somers, Albert Batalla
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Psychoactive Tryptamines in Addiction: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Pim B van der Meer, Nout Schukking, Maarten Dik, Aumer van Reemst, Juan J Fuentes, Ad A Kaptein, Jan W Schoones, Sebastiaan Verboeket, Marleen M de Waal, Anneke E Goudriaan, Cornelis Kramers, Arnt Schellekens, Matthijs G Bossong, Metten Somers, Albert Batalla","doi":"10.1177/28314425251364182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Psychedelics such as lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) and psilocybin have shown a beneficial effect on substance use disorder (SUD) symptoms. In this systematic review, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of psychoactive tryptamines in patients with an SUD or non-substance-related disorder (i.e., gambling disorder) in order to provide a comprehensive overview of the available evidence and identify potential research gaps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was performed in eight different databases up to February 2024. Clinical trials were included that assessed the efficacy and safety of psychoactive tryptamines other than psilocybin and ibogaine. A quality assessment of the included trials was done based on the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of four clinical trials (three randomized controlled trials and one single-arm clinical trial; <i>n</i> = 176 patients) were included, all in patients with alcohol use disorder. Dipropyltryptamine and diethyltryptamine were the two investigated psychoactive tryptamines. Abstinence ranged from 10% (duration of follow-up unknown) to 38% at 26 weeks of follow-up, and severity of alcohol use did not differ between the psychoactive tryptamine group and the control groups. Adverse effects were not well reported in the trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Studies assessing the efficacy of psychoactive tryptamines other than psilocybin and ibogaine in addiction are scarce and show limited evidence for effectiveness in the treatment of addictive disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":74590,"journal":{"name":"Psychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","volume":"4 1","pages":"45-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13089291/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/28314425251364182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Psychedelics such as lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) and psilocybin have shown a beneficial effect on substance use disorder (SUD) symptoms. In this systematic review, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of psychoactive tryptamines in patients with an SUD or non-substance-related disorder (i.e., gambling disorder) in order to provide a comprehensive overview of the available evidence and identify potential research gaps.

Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in eight different databases up to February 2024. Clinical trials were included that assessed the efficacy and safety of psychoactive tryptamines other than psilocybin and ibogaine. A quality assessment of the included trials was done based on the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tools.

Results: A total of four clinical trials (three randomized controlled trials and one single-arm clinical trial; n = 176 patients) were included, all in patients with alcohol use disorder. Dipropyltryptamine and diethyltryptamine were the two investigated psychoactive tryptamines. Abstinence ranged from 10% (duration of follow-up unknown) to 38% at 26 weeks of follow-up, and severity of alcohol use did not differ between the psychoactive tryptamine group and the control groups. Adverse effects were not well reported in the trials.

Conclusion: Studies assessing the efficacy of psychoactive tryptamines other than psilocybin and ibogaine in addiction are scarce and show limited evidence for effectiveness in the treatment of addictive disorders.

精神活性色胺治疗成瘾的有效性和安全性:一项系统综述。
背景:麦角酸二乙胺(LSD)和裸盖菇素等致幻剂已显示出对物质使用障碍(SUD)症状的有益作用。在这篇系统综述中,我们旨在评估精神活性色胺对SUD或非物质相关障碍(即赌博障碍)患者的疗效和安全性,以便对现有证据进行全面概述,并确定潜在的研究空白。方法:系统检索截至2024年2月的8个不同数据库的文献。临床试验评估了除裸盖菇素和伊博格碱以外的精神活性色胺的有效性和安全性。根据修订后的Cochrane偏倚风险工具对纳入的试验进行质量评估。结果:共纳入4项临床试验(3项随机对照试验和1项单臂临床试验,n = 176例),均为酒精使用障碍患者。二丙基色胺和二乙基色胺是两种被调查的精神活性色胺。在26周的随访中,戒酒率从10%(随访时间未知)到38%不等,在精神活性色胺组和对照组之间,酒精使用的严重程度没有差异。试验中没有很好的报道不良反应。结论:评估除裸盖菇素和伊博格碱以外的精神活性色胺类药物对成瘾的疗效的研究很少,并且在治疗成瘾障碍方面的有效性证据有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书